The Nature and Interrelationship of Various Geometries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

The Nature and Interrelationship of Various Geometries

Description:

The geometry taught today in school is a confused mixture ... terms of properties invariant under homeomorphism, one can see the underlying idea in operation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: tommywco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nature and Interrelationship of Various Geometries


1
The Nature and Inter-relationship of Various
Geometries
2
Geometry
  • The geometry taught today in school is a confused
    mixture of Euclid's and Descartes'. But the
    teacher is not to blame.

3
Geometry
  • Having evolved from antiquity from often-used
    methods for measurement of figures drawn mainly
    on plane surfaces, the methods and principles
    became distilled, for ready reference and use, as
    mathematical propositions, particularly in Greece
    in the peace and prosperity of the few centuries
    following the rule of Pericles. Then Euclid, in
    around 300 B.C., gathered, improved, and
    systematically wrote down all that was known in
    geometry to his day. The work - called The
    Elements - attempted to develop geometry from the
    firm foundation of axioms and succeeded in great
    measure to provide rigorous demonstrations -
    proof - of the mathematical results loosely
    proved by his predecessors.

4
Euclidean Geometry
  • While most of the proofs in Euclid's work were
    correct, blemishes were discovered in some proofs
    one of which being the very first proposition in
    the Elements. However, these blemishes were not
    due to erroneous deduction but tacit assumptions
    or "intuitively obvious" facts that were not
    justified by the axioms.

5
Euclidean Geometry
  • Considerations of these blemishes culminated in
    1899 with David Hilbert's proposal of a revised
    axiom system that would not only preserve the
    validity of the proofs in the Elements but which
    was in conformity with the modern notion of the
    axiomatic method as proceeding from a set of
    undefined terms, definitions, and the axiom
    statements on the undefined terms. The Euclidean
    Geometry of today is the geometry based on this
    revised axiom system or other equivalent systems
    since proposed.

6
Euclids Axiomatics
  • Undefined terms point, line, plane
  • Common Notions
  • Things equal to the same thing are equal.
  • If equals are added to equals, the results are
    equal.
  • If equals are subtracted from equals, the results
    are equal.
  • Things that coincide with one another are equal
    to one another.
  • The whole is greater than the part.

7
Euclids Axiomatics
  • Undefined terms point, line, plane
  • Postulates
  • Exactly one straight can be drawn from any point
    to any other point.
  • A finite straight line can be extended
    continuously in a straight line.
  • A circle can be formed with any center and
    distance (radius).
  • All right angles are equal to one another.
  • If a straight line falling on two straight lines
    makes the sum of the interior angles on the same
    side less than two right angles, then the two
    straight lines, if extended indefinitely, meet on
    that side on which the angle sum is less than two
    right angles.

8
Euclidean Geometry
  • Although Euclid's axioms needed to be revised to
    make all his proofs correct, Euclid's Geometry
    remained for two millennia as the example and
    model of the deductive method of mathematics. But
    the beauty of Euclid's geometry is that it does
    not make use of numbers to measure lengths or
    angles or areas or volumes. Instead, it deals
    with points, lines, triangles, circles, and the
    relationships among these.

9
Analytic Geometry
  • Even as the discussion on the Parallel Postulate
    of Euclid was raging on, Rene Descartes, in the
    year 1637, discovered that the ruler and compass
    constructions of Euclidean Geometry correspond to
    the solution of linear and quadratic equations in
    algebra on a Real Cartesian Plane constructed as
    follows. A point is an ordered pair of real
    numbers. The set of all such pairs is the
    Cartesian Plane. The set of points (a,0) is
    called the x-axis, and the set of points (0,b) is
    called the y-axis. The intersection of these axes
    is called the origin. A line in this plane is the
    subset defined by an equation of the form ax by
    c 0, with a and b not both zero.

10
Analytic Geometry
  • Descartes gave four (unmarked) ruler and compass
    constructions using line segments a and b to
    construct ab, ab, a/b and va, and showed that
    all construction problems of Euclidean Geometry
    can be done in his Cartesian Plane. Since this
    geometry in the Real Cartesian Plane satisfies
    all the axioms of Hilbert, it follows that the
    Cartesian Plane is Euclidean geometry using
    numbers.

11
Analytic Geometry
  • The method of solution used in finding points
    from given points in the Real Cartesian Plane is
    called Analytic Geometry. But Analytic Geometry
    is not a Geometry in the sense of a theory like
    Euclidean Geometry that is derived from an axiom
    set. Rather, Analytic Geometry is a method of
    doing geometry problems using algebra.

12
Neutral Geometry
  • Euclid's axioms without the fifth - which is the
    parallel axiom often referred to simply as the
    Fifth - or Hilbert's axioms without Euclid's
    Fifth is today called Neutral Geometry. In this
    geometry, the most important theorem is the
    Exterior Angle Theorem that the measure of the
    exterior angle of a triangle is greater than
    either of the non-adjacent interior angles.
    Compare this to the case in Euclidean Geometry
    which is Neutral Geometry Euclid's Fifth axiom.
    In Euclidean Geometry, the measure of the
    exterior angle is equal to the sum of the
    measures of the nonadjacent interior angles.

13
Neutral Geometry
  • The weak-looking Exterior Angle Theorem of
    Neutral Geometry implies the Alternate Interior
    Angle Theorem. That is, if two lines are
    intersected by a transversal such that a pair of
    alternate interior angles formed are congruent,
    then the lines are parallel. This theorem has the
    immediate corollary that two lines perpendicular
    to the same line are parallel. This corollary
    gives another corollary which can be said to be
    the culminating result of Neutral
    GeometryThere is at least one line parallel to
    a given line through a point not on that line.

14
Neutral Geometry
  • An important result of Neutral Geometry is also
    that the angle sum in a triangle is at most two
    right angles. The corresponding situation in
    Euclidean Geometry is that the angle sum in a
    triangle is two right angles.

15
Hyperbolic Geometry
  • In the two millennia since Euclid the greatest
    ongoing mathematical discussion was not on the
    blemishes in some of Euclid's proofs, but on the
    independence of the Fifth Axiom of Euclid which
    meant that given a line and a point not on it,
    exactly one line can be drawn through the point
    and parallel to the line. Gauss, Bolyai,and
    Lobachevsky separately and independently(?)
    discovered the new geometry - Hyperbolic Geometry
    - that assumed the negation of the Fifth Axiom.
    This established the independence of the Fifth
    axiom of Euclidean Geometry and laid to rest the
    longest discussion in the history of mathematics
    to that date.

16
Elliptic Geometry
  • A non-Euclidean Geometry is a geometry that has
    the negation of the Parallel Postulate as one of
    its axioms. An example is hyperbolic geometry. It
    turns out that hyperbolic geometry allows more
    than one parallel line through a point off a
    given line. Elliptic Geometry allows no parallel
    line to a given line.

17
Elliptic Geometry
  • The name "elliptic" is misleading, for it has no
    direct connection with the curve called ellipse.
    The name is used as an analogy of the following
    result. A central conic is called an ellipse or
    hyperbola according as it has no asymptote or two
    asymptotes. Analogously, a non-Euclidean plane is
    said to be elliptic or hyperbolic according as
    each of its lines contains no point at infinity
    or two points at infinity. A model of Elliptic
    Geometry is the surface of a sphere with great
    circles as lines and antipodal points identified.

18
Elliptic Geometry
  • Note that, if Elliptic Geometry allows no
    parallel lines, it can not have Neutral Geometry
    inside it as is the case with hyperbolic
    geometry. For in Neutral Geometry, we have the
    Alternate Interior Angle Theorem which implies
    that there is at least one parallel line through
    a point off a given line. If we can not have
    Neutral Geometry as part of Elliptic Geometry, we
    ask what axiom of Neutral Geometry is requiring
    the existence of parallel lines.

19
Elliptic Geometry
  • Since the Alternate Interior Angle Theorem of
    Neutral Geometry makes parallel lines necessary,
    we investigate its proof. Its proof depends on
    the Exterior Angle Theorem. So we ask "what does
    the proof of the Exterior Angle Theorem depend
    on?" It turns out it relies on three major
    components triangle congruence, angle addition,
    and plane separation. Since triangle congruence
    and angle addition are at the core of geometry,
    we do not seek to modify these. The remaining
    candidate for removal is plane separation. So we
    remove those axioms that imply plane separation.
    That would result in a geometry where we are able
    to pass from one side of a line to the other
    without crossing the line. And that is the
    geometry on the surface of the sphere with great
    circles as lines. Since the model identifies
    antipodal points on great circles, it is called a
    single elliptic geometry.

20
Affine Geometry
  • Affine Geometry takes for its axioms only
    Euclid's axioms I and II. This Geometry is
    motivated by the fact that its results hold not
    only in Euclidean Geometry but also in Hyperbolic
    Geometry and the Minkowskian Geometry of time and
    space. The propositions that hold in Affine
    Geometry are those that are preserved by parallel
    projection from one plane to another - for
    example the first 28 propositions of Euclid, then
    29 and 33-45, and some others in books
    III(1-19,25,28-30), IV(4-9), and
    VI(1,2,4,9,10,24-26)

21
Projective Geometry
  • This is the parent of all infinite geometries in
    that one can get all those geometries by
    appropriate restrictions and modifications of
    projective geometry. The projective geometry in
    the plane begins with the following four axioms
  • 1. There exists at least one line.2. Every line
    contains at least three points. 3. Any two
    distinct points lie on a unique line.4. Any two
    lines meet in at least one point.5. There exist
    three noncollinear points.

22
Projective Geometry
  • The most elegant property of projective geometry
    is the principle of duality, which means that
    every definition remains relevant and every
    theorem remains valid when we consistently
    interchange the words point and line (and
    simultaneously interchange lie on and pass
    through, join and intersection, collinear and
    concurrent, etc.).

23
Projective Geometry
  • To establish the duality it suffices to verify
    that the axioms imply their own duals. As a
    result, given a theorem and its proof, we
    immediately can assert the dual theorem. It is a
    useful exercise to verify that the dual of an
    axiom is itself either an axiom or a theorem
    derivable from the remaining axioms.

24
Finite Geometries
  • These are systems comprising a finite number of
    points and satisfying some of the axioms of
    Euclidean Geometry. Examples are Fano Geometry, ?
    .

25
Geometries Defined Over Fields
  • The Real Cartesian Plane satisfies all the axioms
    of Euclidean Geometry. The word "Real" is
    important here. The points in the Cartesian Plane
    we discussed were ordered pairs of real numbers.
    The set of Real Numbers is an example of an
    algebraic structure called a field. So we could
    ask if we can use any field in place of the Real
    Numbers. It turns out, depending on the field,
    only some of the Hilbert axioms may hold in the
    associated Cartesian Plane. However, all of these
    various Cartesian Planes provide various
    geometries.

26
Geometries Defined Over Fields
  • So what are the fields whose associated Cartesian
    Planes give exactly Euclidean Geometries? It
    turns out that the smallest such field is
    obtained from the set of rational numbers by
    adjoining square roots as well as the addition,
    multiplication and square roots of the rationals.
    The resulting field is called a Hilbert's Field
    and the Cartesian Plane associcated with this
    field is called a Hilbert Plane.

27
Relationship of the Various Geometries
28
(No Transcript)
29
The Erlangen Program
30
Felix Christian Klein(1849 1925)
31
The problems of nineteenth century geometry
  • Is there one 'geometry' or many? Since Euclid,
    geometry had meant the geometry of Euclidean
    space of two dimensions (plane geometry) or of
    three dimensions (solid geometry). In the first
    half of the nineteenth century there had been
    several developments complicating the picture.
    Mathematical applications required geometry of
    four or more dimensions the close scrutiny of
    the foundations of the traditional Euclidean
    geometry had revealed the independence of the
    Parallel Axiom from the others, and non-Euclidean
    geometry had been born and in projective
    geometry new 'points' (points at infinity, points
    with complex number co-ordinates) had been
    introduced.

32
The Erlangen Program
  • An influential research programme and manifesto
    was published in 1872 by Felix Klein, under the
    title Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere
    geometrische Forschungen. This Erlangen Program
    (Erlanger Programm) Klein was then at Erlangen,
    Germany proposed a new kind of solution to the
    problems of geometry of the time.

33
The Solution
  • In abstract terms the solution was to use
    symmetry as an underlying principle, and to state
    first that different geometries could co-exist,
    because they dealt with different types of
    propositions and invariances related to different
    types of symmetry and transformation.

34
The Solution
  • By abstracting the underlying groups of
    symmetries from the geometries, the relationships
    between them can be re-established at the group
    level.

35
Invariants by Type of Geometry
  • Geometry Transformation
    Invariants
  • Group
  • Projective
    cross-ratio

  • plane at infinity
  • Affine
    relative distances

  • along direction

  • parallelism

  • Metric
    relative distances

  • angles

  • absolute conic
  • Euclidean
    absolute distances

36
Shapes which are equivalent to a cube for the
different geometric ambiguities
37
Influence on later work
  • The long-term effects of the Erlangen programme
    can be seen all over pure mathematics (see tacit
    use at congruence (geometry), for example) and
    the idea of transformations and of synthesis
    using groups of symmetry is, of course, now
    standard too in physics.

38
Influence on later work
  • When topology is routinely described in terms of
    properties invariant under homeomorphism, one can
    see the underlying idea in operation. The groups
    involved will be infinite-dimensional in almost
    all cases - and not Lie groups - but the
    philosophy is the same. Of course this mostly
    speaks to the pedagogical influence of Klein.
    Books such as those by H.S.M. Coxeter routinely
    used the Erlangen Program approach to help
    place geometries. In pedagogic terms, the
    program became transformation geometry, a mixed
    blessing in the sense that it builds on stronger
    intuitions than the style of Euclid, but is less
    easily converted into a logical system.

39
Influence on later work
  • In his book Structuralism (1970) Jean Piaget
    says, "In the eyes of contemporary structuralist
    mathematicians, like Bourbaki, the Erlangen
    Program amounts to only a partial victory for
    structuralism, since they want to subordinate all
    mathematics, not just geometry, to the idea of
    structure."

40
Marius Sophus Lie(1842 1899)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com