CEWIP EVALUATION

1
CEWIP EVALUATION

• Second year
• ITALY - Olbia
• Istituto di Istruzione Superiore
• a.s. 2004-05

2
Common European Words

• OUR FIELDS
• People
• Objects
• Nature and world
• Time

3
Languages explored during our researches

• German
• English
• French
• Spanish
• Italian
• Slovak
• Polish

4
Period of time

• From September 2004
• to May 2005still to finish
• Extra national meetings June 2005

5
Who took part at I.I.S.?

• pupils from classes 1st / 2nd /3rd classes
• 15 pupils asked to take part
• Only 10 really attended the lessons
• teacher in charge Marcella Busia
• Other teachers involved
• From IPIA Chiara Dettori

6
What abilities we improved

• computer skills
• communication (chat, e-mail, audioconf)
• search for idioms
• word processing
• painting and graphic design
• Recording sounds in Italian and French
• Convertion into MP3

7
How did we work?2 different organizations

• National group work with Cewip pupils almost
  every WED from 1430 to 1630 (all tasks)
• 2nd classes from APR during some curricular
  English hours drawings

8
AUDIO-VIDEO CONFERENCING ACTIVITIES
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
RECORDING..
12
DRAWING ACTIVITIES
13
What we did in our national team

• We searched for IDIOMS and put them into our
  lists according to the topics
• We drawn the litteral meaning of our idioms
• We recorded our idioms in Italian and French (on
  the PC)
• We wrote down the meaning of our idioms, an
  example for each and the origin for some chosen
  ones.

14
What went well.

• Open classes (National group)
• Open international class
• Great enthusiasm (girl-mates and friends to meet
  abroad)
• Interesting topics
• Success of PC lab

15
What was difficult..from teachers p.o.v.

• Different activitiessame time
• Lack of time (2h a week)
• No cooperation with other teachers ..
• Too many projects/activities (also outside the
  school) for pupils at the same time
• Netmeeting time

16
Common Work Evaluation

• cooperation between schools OK
• e-mail and Yahoo messenger! OK
• Skype quite always ok
• Distribution of tasks OK
• Lindlar Coordination work Excellent!!!
• Being awarded in Prague great!!!!
• Our experience in Helsinki satisfactory
• Students mobility something we missed!!!

17
What we miss.

• More cooperation inside our school
• More students as Cewip group
• A Comenius language assistant.

18
3nd year suggestions

• Same pattern as this year, that is
• 2/3 proverb fields/country
• Less drawings
• Recording only mother language
• More intercultural topics / geography of our
  partners countries
• Exchanging email addresses among our students