Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning

Description:

Head, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Deputy Director, Assessment Standards ... The grade it deserves is. What I would like your comments on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: lizs1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Student assessment: lightening the load while increasing the learning


1
Student assessment lightening the load while
increasing the learning
  • Dr Chris Rust
  • Head, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning
    Development
  • Deputy Director, Assessment Standards Knowledge
    Exchange (ASKe)
  • Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning
  • Oxford Brookes University, UK

2
3 possible ways of reducing staff assessment load
  • Involve the students
  • Mechanise
  • Strategic programme decisions

3
Self-assessment
  • Strengths of this piece of work
  • Weaknesses in this piece of work
  • How this work could be improved
  • The grade it deserves is..
  • What I would like your comments on

4
Marking exercise
  • Immediate results participants av. mk non
    participants av. mk.
  • Cohort 1 (99/00) 59.78 54.12
  • Cohort 2 (00/01) 59.86 52.86
  • Cohort 3 (01/02 55.7 49.7
  • Results 1 year later
  • Cohort 1 57.91 51.3
  • Cohort 2 56.4 51.7
  • Rust, C., Price, M ODonovan, B.(2003)
    "Improving students learning by
  • developing their understanding of assessment
    criteria and processes
  • Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,
    Vol. 28, No. 2

5
Peer marking using model answers (Forbes
Spence, 1991)
  • Scenario
  • Engineering students had weekly maths problem
    sheets marked and problem classes
  • Increased student numbers meant marking
    impossible and problem classes big enough to hide
    in
  • Students stopped doing problems
  • Exam marks declined (Average 55gt45)
  • Solution
  • Course requirement to complete 50 problem sheets
  • Peer assessed at six lecture sessions but marks
    do not count
  • Exams and teaching unchanged
  • Outcome Exam marks increased (Av. 45gt80)

6
Peer feedback (Rust, 2001)
  • Scenario
  • Geography students did two essays but no apparent
    improvement from one to the other despite lots of
    tutor time writing feedback
  • Increased student numbers made tutor workload
    impossible
  • Solution
  • Only one essay but first draft required part way
    through course
  • Students read and give each other feedback on
    their draft essays
  • Students rewrite the essay in the light of the
    feedback
  • In addition to the final draft, students also
    submit a summary of how the 2nd draft has been
    altered from the1st in the light of the feedback
  • Outcome Much better essays

7
Mechanise assessment
  • Statement banks
  • Assignment attachment sheets
  • Optical mark reader
  • Computer aided-assessment

8
Mechanise assessment - 1 Statement Banks
  • Write out frequently used feedback comments,
  • for example
  • I like this sentence/section because it is clear
    and concise
  • I found this paragraph/section/essay well
    organised and easy to follow
  • I am afraid I am lost. This paragraph/section is
    unclear and leaves me confused as to what you
    mean
  • I would understand and be more convinced if you
    gave an example/quote/statistic to support this
  • It would really help if you presented this data
    in a table
  • This is an important point and you make it well
  • etc.

9
Weekly CAA testing - case study data
(Brown, Rust Gibbs,1994)
10
CAA quizzes (Catley, 2005)
  • Scenario
  • First term, first year compulsory law module
  • A new subject for most (75) students
  • High failure rate (25), poor general results
    (28 3rd class, 7 Ist)
  • Solution
  • Weekly optional WebCT quizzes (50 take-up)
  • Outcome
  • Quiz takers 4 fail, 14 3rd class, 24 Ist
  • Non-quiz takers same pattern as before
  • Overall 14 fail (approx half previous figure)
  • 21 3rd class
  • 14 1st (double previous figure)

11
Strategic reduction 1
  • Need audits
  • - Of assessment methods
  • - Of learning outcomes
  • Need Departmental learning, teaching
  • and assessment strategies

12
Strategic reduction 2
  • Reduce time spent on assessment
  • reduce repetition (eg lab reports)
  • more variety (eg less essays)
  • identify different course goals
  • ? pass/fail (at least in 1st year)
  • just grades, no marks
  • assess selectively

13
Assessing a selection (Rust, 2001)
  • Scenario
  • Weekly lab reports submitted for marking
  • Increased student numbers meant heavy staff
    workload and increasingly lengthy gap before
    returned so feedback of limited/no use
  • Solution
  • Weekly lab reports still submitted
  • Sample number looked at, and generic feedback
    e-mailed to all students within 48 hours
  • At end of semester, only three weeks lab reports
    selected for summative marking
  • Outcome
  • Better lab reports and significantly less marking

14
Strategic reduction 3
  • Reduce time spent on feedback
  • give general feedback / whole class
  • use feedback forms
  • use students
  • use statement banks
  • use computer-based tests
  • give focused feedback (one criterion)
  • give audio-recorded feedback
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com