Title: THE NEW ASC PAYMENT SYSTEM:
1- THE NEW ASC PAYMENT SYSTEM
- MYTH AND REALITY
- Michael A. Romansky, JD
- Washington Counsel, OOSS
- mromansky_at_OOSS.org
- (301)332-6474
2Todays Agenda
- Update on ASC Payment Reform
- Final ASC Rule Where We Won and Where Our
Work Isnt Completed - Proposed Medicare ASC Conditions for Coverage
- Physician Investment in ASCs
3Getting the Job Done
- Leadership commitment
- Professional lobbying
- Sound data-driven policy positions
- Be willing to legislate!
- Grassroots developing relationships with
policy-makers - Alliances Keeping your friends close and your
enemies closer - Political action -- OOSPAC
4Realities of the Past Legislative Mandates
- 2007 cuts in 66810, 66821, 67141, 66625
- No ASC annual updates for 2004-9
- CMS must adopt new prospective payment system by
January 1, 2008
5New Payment System Options
- Status Quo
- CMS conducts new ASC cost survey
- CMS links ASC rates to HOPD payments
6Rebasing via Crosswalk What We Like
- Hospital data better than ASCs
- More likely for ASCs to receive annual updates
- Joint lobbying by hospital and ASC industries
- Hospitals enjoy add-ons, e.g. drug/device
pass-throughs - Broader list of covered procedures
- Cataract diluted as target for cuts
7GOAL 1 -- Getting Rid of the ASC List and
Getting Paid for all Ophthalmic Services
- MedPAC 2004 Report -- After ASC rebasing, current
list of procedures should be replaced with list
of services which, based on clinical safety
standards, should NOT be covered
8Coverage of Services ASC List
- Industry Position
-
- Exclusive list
- Updated annually
- Everything except (1)overnight stay and (2)
unsafe in ASC - Use inpatient only list Update annually
9Coverage of Services ASC List
- Final Rule
- Exclusive list
- Updated annually
- High-intensity services -- includes virtually
all ophthalmic codes (w/ RV services up 40) - Future Services subject to restrictive criteria
- Inpatient only list
- No overnight stay
- Safety risk invasion of body cavities,
extensive blood loss, emergent or
life-threatening
10Coverage of Services ASC List
- CMS Rule
- Office-type procedures 500 added, incl. most
ophthalmic codes - Payment ASC paid at lower of
- 65 percent of HOPD, or
- Practice expense component of MFS
- OOSS/Industry Position
- Full ASC conversion factor (75, 65, whatever)
should apply to all services regardless of
setting
11- GOAL 2 GETTING
- PAID FAIR AND EQUITABLE RATES
12Payment for ASC Services
- Classification System
- Industry use APC system utilized in HOPD
(approx. 100 surgical categories - CMS Rule same
13Payment for ASC Services
- Industry
- Commencing 1/1/08, CMS pay ASCs 75 of rate paid
to HOPDs - CMS Rule
- Commencing 1/1/08, CMS pay ASCs 65 of rate paid
to HOPDs
14Payment for ASC Services
- Why 65
- Not based on real relative costs of providing
services in HOPD vs. ASC - COLA freeze has dropped percentage each year
- Calculations tied to meeting MMA requirement for
budget neutrality, i.e., same expenditures in
2008 as 2007 - Faulty assumptions about migration of services
between HOPD and ASC
15Impact of Rule by Specialty
16Payment for ASC Services
- Industry response
- CMS must use more flexible BN approach, i.e.
larger total ambulatory surgery pool - Challenge migration assumptions
- Legislate if necessary (HR 1823) and it is
necessary! - EACH PERCENTAGE POINT ADDED IS
- 30 MILLION FOR ASCs
17Payment for ASC Services
- Recalibration of Relative Weights
- Industry Annual recalculation of weights
- CMS Rule Annual recalculation of weights
18Payment for ASC Services
- ASC Annual Updates
- Industry Position -- Every year, ASCs should
receive hospital market basket (approx. 4) - CMS Rule Starting in 2010, ASCs receive
Consumer Price Index-Urban (approx. 3)
19Payment for ASC Services
- Office Based Payment Limitation
- If performed 50 of time in office, ASC receives
lesser of 65 of HOPD or MFS practice expense
amount. - Doesnt change MD payment
- Limit doesnt apply to HOPDs
20Payment for ASC Services
- Payments for Innovative Drugs and Devices
- Industry Position ASCs should receive same
pass-through payments as HOPDs - CMS Proposal No
- CMS Final Rule Yes
21Payment for ASC Services
- Device-Intensive Procedures
- Procedures for which device costs exceed 50 of
facility fee (approx. 40 such procedures) - Relief ASC receives 65 of facility fee 100
of the device component - No immediate impact on ophthalmology, but
important precedent
22Payment for ASC Services
- Payments for Less Costly Implantable Devices
- Final CMS Rule No special relief
- Transition formula results in actual decreases in
payments for ophthalmic services with implants,
e.g. 66180 (aqueous shunt to extraocular
reservoir), 65105 (enucleation of eye, w/
implant) 65155 (reinsertion of ocular implant) - OOSS Position CMS should provide full payments
for implants during transition
23Payment for ASC Services
- New Technology IOL
- CMS provides 50 bonus to ASC for implant of
NTIOL - Currently applies to AMO Array, Starr Toric, AMO
Tecnis, and Alcon Acrysoft - CMS Rule
- Modifies application/review/approval process
- Proposes change in review standards
24Payment for ASC Services
- Corneal Tissue
- CMS Rule Continues current policy of paying for
corneal tissue based on invoiced costs
25Payment for ASC Services
- Transition to New Payment System
- Proposal 2 years
- Final Rule 4 years
- Impact on ophthalmic services
-
26Payment for ASC Services
- Beneficiary Co-payments
- Industry New payment system should maintain
current patient cost-sharing requirements, i.e.
20 of Medicare payment - Contrast with HOPD 20 of hospitals charges,
meaning beneficiarys out-of-pocket is 20-40 of
facility fee - CMS Rule Same as industry
27Getting from 65 to 75 Percent How Do We Want the
Proposed Rule Changed?
- More flexible view of budget neutrality
- ASC rates at gt 65 of HOPD rates
- Annual updates at hospital market basket, like
HOPD - Larger ASC list --with physicians, not CMS,
making decisions as to site of surgery - Full reimbursement at ASC rates for office-type
procedures
28Getting from 65 75 Percent How Do We Want the
Proposed Rule Changed?
- Oppose dilution of percentage to provide special
relief for other specialties, e.g., GI, pain
management - Transition relief for procedures involving
implantable devices
29HOW DO WE GET THIS DONE?
- Ask your Senators and Representatives to
cosponsor HR 1823 - Alert them that the ASC industry objects to the
proposed ASC payment system - HOW TO DO IT Go to the ASC Advocacy Center
- www.OOSS.org
30HOW DO WE GET THIS DONE?
- Political Action Its not a four-letter word!
- Join the Outpatient Ophthalmic Surgery
Political Action Committee - OOSPAC
31HOW DO WE GET THIS DONE?
- If you are not a member of OOSS, join NOW.
- If you are a member, join the OOSS Presidents
Council.
32PROPOSED MEDICARE ASC CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE
- CMS has proposed first revision in 25 years to
ASC conditions of coverage (CfC) - New responsibilities and restrictions
- No planned overnight stays
- More responsibilities for governing body and
management - Quality assessment and performance improvement
standards
33PROPOSED MEDICARE ASC CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE
- New responsibilities and restrictions(cont.)
- Patient rights
- Infection control
- Patient admission, assessment, discharge
34PHYSICIAN INVESTMENT IN ASCs
- Hospital industrys niche providers campaign,
e.g., specialty and surgical hospitals - ASCs enjoy federal safe harbor protection
- Hospital industry attacks on ASCs at state level
- Limits on self-referral
- Tougher CON and licensure restrictions
- Provider taxes
35OUR BIGGEST AGENDA EVERWHAT IS OOSS DOING FOR
YOU
- Your lobbyist, Mike Romansky, is full-time with
OOSS - Developing meaningful and credible federal ASC
policy - Developing data
- Lobbying the Congress
- Lobbying the regulators CMS, MedPAC, GAO, CBO,
OIG
36OUR BIGGEST AGENDA EVERWHAT IS OOSS DOING FOR
YOU
- Mobilizing the ASC industry
- Providing you with user-friendly material for
your comments to CMS and communications with
legislators - Visit the OOSS Advocacy Center at
www.OOSS.org - Political action