Title: Corporate Actions Processing
1Corporate Actions Processing Conference October
25, 2007
2Panel Discussion
Automating Corporate Actions Processing As an
Essential Part of STP Moderator Nancy
Turbé Accenture Capital Markets Consulting
Group Panelists Michael Egan, Managing
Director Class Actions Claims Management Mark
Henry, Chief Architect Financial Information,
Inc. Kevin Cullen, Vice President Information
Mosaic
3Corporate Inaction With Corporate Actions
Automation
- Less than 15 of Custodians in Europe have an end
to end CA - G30 2003 Report Corporate actions, are the
major source of financial losses attributable to
operational failure. - Giovannini Report
- Barrier 17 to Single Market among top three
single highest priorities - Corporate Actions Standards is one of the 3
highest priorities - Automation system
- Less than 2 of Investment Managers have an end
to end CA Automation system - 42 of transactions in US institutions remain
paper-based - 40 of FIs enter data more than once for the same
transaction
4Common Corporate Actions Processing Problems
Host System not Updated
No Notification from counterpart
Trading shares not available
Positions not protected
Missed Deadlines
Host system(s) not updated/updated incorrectly
Incorrect Information
Trading shares not owned
No Diary Entry
Incorrect decision applied
Position Taken Late
Positions Disagree
5Commercial Challenges
- Slow, error prone processing / dissemination of
incoming market notices - Accurate position entitlement calculations
- Task management, control transparency of action
lifecycle - Reconciliation auditing
- Meeting obligations for market protection
claims - Achieving a balance between STP dual controls
6The Integration Challenge
7The Integration Effort
- External System Integration - Major Challenges
- Bad Data
- Extracting the Right Data
- Quality and Format of Feeds
- Format of ISO15022 messages (The Standard)
- Message Normalization
- Timely updates
- Data reconciliation
8Data Formats
- ISO 15022
- XML
- Vendor Proprietary
- ISO 20022 (Future)
9ISO 15022
- Pros
- International Standard
- Can be transmitted over SWIFT network
- Allows additional information to be added in text
- Cons
- Some items in the standard are not clearly
defined and subject to interpretation - Some characters are not permitted or require
complex coding to include - No free parsers available
10Example of MT564 Layout
11XML
- Pros
- Free Parsers available
- Most Database software supports direct XML
loading - No size limitations for files or fields
- Very flexible, changeable
- Cons
- Not standardized yet
- Files can be large in size
- Can not be transmitted over the SWIFT network
12Vendor Proprietary
- Pros
- Format has existed for a long time
- Customized for clients needs
- Cons
- Custom programs needed to support processing
- Transmission options may be limited
- Can not be transmitted over the SWIFT network
13ISO 20022
- Pros
- International Standard
- Uses XML for structure
- Cons
- Corporate Actions Messages are not defined yet
- Adoption of new standards can be slow
14TYPES OF CORPORATE ACTIONS
Getting to STP
- Mandatory examples
- Dividend Payment
- Interest Payment
- Merger
- Spin-off
- Stock Split
- Voluntary - examples
- Rights Issue
- Takeover
- Tender Offer
- Class Action
15SECURITIES CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS
- COLLECTING THE MISSING BILLIONS
- Approximately 17 billion were distributed in
2006. Less than 30 of eligible institutions
filed claims. - Accordingly, approximately 11.7 billion was not
claimed by eligible claimants.
16Benefits of Participating in Class Action
Settlements
- Those institutions that do participate recover
significant amounts of money for their funds. - Easy way to increase assets under management and
investment performance and results. - Offer a unique service to institutional clients
that makes them money and solves the claims
filing problem for them. - Gain insulation from lawsuits for not filing
claims.
17Securities Class Action Life Cycle
Notice of Settlement Published and mailed to
shareholders
Filing of lawsuit, publication of notice
Claims processed by claims administer
Dispositive Motions
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Settlement reached between parties
Appointment of lead plaintiff
Claim Forms filed by Shareholders
Settlement proceeds are distributed
2 to 10 Years (5 Years Typical)
18Challenges and Failures Arising from Class
Action Notification Process
- Notice of lawsuit is given by press release or in
WSJ. The lawsuit should be tracked and
transactions in relevant securities flagged for
follow up. - Either no notice or very limited notice of
significant developments in the case, usually via
press release. These developments should be
tracked because the dispositive motions end the
lawsuit or push it to settlement. - Notice of Settlement is by publication of press
release or tombstone ad in WSJ and mailing of
paper claim form. The proper parties do not
receive notice in a timely manner. - Only those shareholders as identified by the
transfer agent or custodians are notified. - There are strict deadlines for participating in
the settlement. Failure to abide by the
deadlines can result in exclusion from the
settlement.
19Challenges and Failures ConcerningFiling Claims
in Class Actions
- There are over a dozen different claims
administrators each with its own filing
requirements and formats. - Key Actions
- Gathering relevant securities transaction data
for the securities eligible to participate in the
settlement within deadlines. - Gathering the supporting documentation for the
claim trade confirms, account statements, etc.,
within deadlines. - Correct deficiencies and handle follow up
correspondence with claims administrators to
ensure claims are complete within deadlines. - Monitor settlement progress and disbursements to
ensure each claim receives payment. - Allocate settlement proceeds to proper account
and audit settlement disbursements to ensure the
correct amount is received for each claim.
20Questions?