Title: Lecture on Applications of the Monte Carlo Adjoint Shielding Methodology
1Lecture onApplications of the Monte Carlo
Adjoint ShieldingMethodology
- By
- Roger A. Rydin, University of Virginia,
Consultant U.S. Army - Craig R. Heimbach, formerly with Army Pulse
Radiation Facility
2Personnel
- Rydin - University Expert, NGIC, VA
- Computational Studies of Military Vehicles and
Structures - Heimbach Experimentalist, APG, MD
- Neutron and Gamma Ray Spectroscopy
- APRF, Crane-Mounted Bare Fast Reactor
- WWD, Munster, Germany, Movable Fallout Simulator
- ETBS, Bourges, France, Fallout Simulator
3Order of Talk
- Generalities About Shielding Methodology
- Available Computer Codes
- Statement of Problem
- Solution Hybrid Method Called MASH
- Examples Galore
4Comments on Mixed FieldNeutron-Gamma Ray
Shielding
- Shielding is an Art
- Requires Skilled Modeling
- Shielding Requires Transport Theory
- Highly Anisotropic Cross Sections
- Discrete Ordinates Sn Methods
- Large Distances In Regular Geometry
- Monte Carlo Methods
- Short Distances In Detailed Geometry
5General Mixed FieldNeutron-Gamma Ray Shielding
- Shield Neutrons With Light Materials
- Water, Plastic, Boron
- Shield Gamma Rays With Heavy Materials
- Lead, Iron
- Beware of
- Holes and Gaps !
6Shielding Codes
- ORNL (Shielding)
- ANISN, DORT, TORT, Discrete Ordinates
- MORSE, Multi-group Monte Carlo
- LANL (Weapons Design)
- TRIDENT, etc, Discrete Ordinates
- MCNP, Continuous Energy Monte Carlo
- Cross Section Libraries, Quadratures
- Incompatible! (2 l 1) / 2 Factor
7Monte Carlo Codes
- MORSE
- Volumetric Primitives - SPH, RPP, ARB,
- ARS, TRC, BOX, ELL, etc
- Boulean Combinatorial Geometry
- MCNP
- Define Surfaces, Make Volumes
- Easy Replication, Restart
- Cant Do Adjoint Problem
8Basic Question
- How Do You Accurately Calculate the Dose Inside a
Geometrically Complicated Shield a Large Distance
from a Mixed Source of Neutrons and Gamma Rays ? - Discrete Ordinates Cant Handle The Shield
Geometry (Stair Steps ?) - Monte Carlo Cant Handle the Distance or a Small
Size Dose Receiver
9Air-Over Ground Problem
- 2D Problem Covers 2 Kilometers
- Large, Geometrically Increasing, Mesh Spaces
in Air, Small Mesh in Ground - 42 Neutron, 17 Gamma Ray Groups
- Cover Inelastic Scattering
- P6 Cross Sections
- Compton Scattering Anisotropy
- S16 Forward Biased Quadrature Set
10Adjoint Problem
- Every Integro Differential Equation Has
- a Dual, Adjoint or Importance Counterpart
- Equations Are Connected Through an
- Integral Variational Principle Functional
- They Have the Same Boundary Conditions
- The Operators Are Obtainable By
- Transpositions, Role Reversals, and
- Energy Direction Reversal
11Solution - MASH Methodology
- Transport from Source Discrete Sn Calculation
with DORT (2D) or TORT (3D) - No Distance and Geometry Limitations to Vicinity
of Shield - Dose in Complicated Shield Stochastic
Calculation with MORSE in Adjoint Mode - Shield Geometry Complexity, Orientation, and All
Particles Start from Detector Volume - Couple Over a Surface Around Shield
12MASH Methodology
- Implied The Presence of the Shield Doesnt
Perturb the Discrete Ordinates Solution - If Untrue, Add a Dummy Shield
- Rotation of the Shield Before Coupling Doesnt
Affect the Answer Not True for Big Shields
13Theory
- FLUX From Source Distribution
- IMPORTANCE From Detector Response
- L-Terms Cancel
14Dose Calculation
- Need Flux at Detector or Importance
at Source
- Or Flux and Importance at a Coupling Surface
15Definitions
- Neutron Reduction Factor NRF
- Neutron Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose Inside
Shield - Gamma Reduction Factor GRF
- Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose Inside
Shield - Fallout Protection Factor FPF
- Fallout Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose
Inside Shield
16Further Definitions
- Neutron Protection Factor NPF
- Neutron Dose Outside (Gray) / N and ? Dose Inside
Shield Caused by Neutron Source - Gamma Protection Factor GPF
- Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / ? Dose Inside Shield
Caused by ? Source
17Applications
- Boxes Near a Prompt Source
- Vehicles Near a Prompt Source
- BNCT Medical Therapy Room Design
- Tank on a Fallout Field
- Small Concrete Building
- Foxhole
- Buildings in an Urban Environment
18Verification of Methodology for Simple Geometries
- 1 Meter Box, Rotated, With Holes and Gaps
- 2 Meter Box ORNL Calculation
- RTK Angled Box From WWD
19Detectors
- ROSPEC 4 Spherical Proportional Counters,
Unfolding - DOSPEC Dose Calibrated NaI
- Calibrated GM Tubes
- TE Ion Chambers
- International Intercalibration Effort US,
UK, Germany, France, Canada
20Small Lined Iron Box
21Small Lined Iron Box
- Unlined, Polyethylene Liner,
- Boron Polyethylene Liner
- 200 Meters From APRF
- Calibrated GM Tubes, Tissue Equivalent Dosimeters
- Learned The Value of Source Energy Biasing
- Start More Particles That Give High Dose
22Medical Therapy Room
23Medical Therapy Room
- Dummy Head in DORT Problem Gives
- Scattering Source to Walls
- Conclusions
- Doesnt Make Much Difference If Patient Is Prone
In Beam, Seated Out Of Beam, Or Shadow Shielded - Dose To Rest Of Body Comes Through the Neck !
-
24T72 Russian Tank Model
10000 Primitive Bodies ARS Arbitrary
Surfaces ARB Arbitrary Polyhedrons etc. 6000
Material Regions by Combinatorial Geometry
25T72 Russian Tank Model
- The Model Came From BRL CAD CAM
- Required Graphical Debugging ORGBUG
- Required Tolerance Debugging
- Lost Particles !
- Required a MORSE Modification !
26Fallout Field at Bourges, FranceUsing La-140
- 80 by 80 Meter Dirt Field
- At Corner, Rotated 160 by 160 Meters
- 30 by 30 Meter Concrete Pad
- At Corner, Rotated 60 by 60 Meters
27Experiment vs. Calculation
- Fallout simulated with Fission Products
- Fallout Simulated with La-140
- Comparison to ORNL Calculations
28FPF Comparisons
29Observations
- Strong Variation, Seat to Head
- Concrete FPF Dirt , in General
- Conc. vs. Dirt Difference, Probably Real
- Calculation in Middle
- Agreement Generally Within Error Bars
- Fallout Protection is Significant
30FPF Comparison, ORNL
31General Conclusions for T 72
- Fallout Protection Factor 40
- Driver Less Well Protected 15
- Some Differences for Source Type
- Some Differences for Model Maker
- Typical Accuracy, 15 20
32Concrete Building Photo
33Concrete Building Model
34Concrete Building, Neutrons
35Concrete Building, Gammas
36Concrete Building Conclusions
- Reasonably Good Neutron Protection 3
- Fair Prompt Gamma Protection 3.5
- Good Fallout Protection 9
- Stay Away From Doors and Windows
37Foxhole Model
38Foxhole Protection Factors
39Foxhole Conclusions
- Reasonably Good Neutron Protection 3
- Fair Prompt Gamma Protection 2
- Good Fallout Protection 12
- Keep Head Down and Stay Inside
40Tall Buildings
41Buildings in an Urban Environment
42Large Buildings
- We Can Make a Geometry Model
- But - New Problem, Not Yet Solved !
- No Experimental Data !
- TORT Had Computational Limits for 10 Story
Building! - MASH Coupling Over Large Surface ?
43Large Buildings, cont.
- Alternate Method, QAD Point Kernel Gamma Code
- QAD Uses MASH Model
- Chinese Building Study near Reactor
- QAD Point Kernel Buildup Factors ?
- Effect of Extended Shadowed Source ?
44Conclusions
- MASH Works Very Well for Small Shields
- C/E Typically 10 20
- Large Buildings Represent an Unsolved Problem
- More Research Needed