Lecture on Applications of the Monte Carlo Adjoint Shielding Methodology

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture on Applications of the Monte Carlo Adjoint Shielding Methodology

Description:

Fallout Protection is Significant. FPF Comparison, ORNL. General Conclusions for T 72 ... Reasonably Good Neutron Protection ~ 3. Fair Prompt Gamma Protection ~ 2 ... –

Number of Views:233
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: roger71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture on Applications of the Monte Carlo Adjoint Shielding Methodology


1
Lecture onApplications of the Monte Carlo
Adjoint ShieldingMethodology
  • By
  • Roger A. Rydin, University of Virginia,
    Consultant U.S. Army
  • Craig R. Heimbach, formerly with Army Pulse
    Radiation Facility

2
Personnel
  • Rydin - University Expert, NGIC, VA
  • Computational Studies of Military Vehicles and
    Structures
  • Heimbach Experimentalist, APG, MD
  • Neutron and Gamma Ray Spectroscopy
  • APRF, Crane-Mounted Bare Fast Reactor
  • WWD, Munster, Germany, Movable Fallout Simulator
  • ETBS, Bourges, France, Fallout Simulator

3
Order of Talk
  • Generalities About Shielding Methodology
  • Available Computer Codes
  • Statement of Problem
  • Solution Hybrid Method Called MASH
  • Examples Galore

4
Comments on Mixed FieldNeutron-Gamma Ray
Shielding
  • Shielding is an Art
  • Requires Skilled Modeling
  • Shielding Requires Transport Theory
  • Highly Anisotropic Cross Sections
  • Discrete Ordinates Sn Methods
  • Large Distances In Regular Geometry
  • Monte Carlo Methods
  • Short Distances In Detailed Geometry

5
General Mixed FieldNeutron-Gamma Ray Shielding
  • Shield Neutrons With Light Materials
  • Water, Plastic, Boron
  • Shield Gamma Rays With Heavy Materials
  • Lead, Iron
  • Beware of
  • Holes and Gaps !

6
Shielding Codes
  • ORNL (Shielding)
  • ANISN, DORT, TORT, Discrete Ordinates
  • MORSE, Multi-group Monte Carlo
  • LANL (Weapons Design)
  • TRIDENT, etc, Discrete Ordinates
  • MCNP, Continuous Energy Monte Carlo
  • Cross Section Libraries, Quadratures
  • Incompatible! (2 l 1) / 2 Factor

7
Monte Carlo Codes
  • MORSE
  • Volumetric Primitives - SPH, RPP, ARB,
  • ARS, TRC, BOX, ELL, etc
  • Boulean Combinatorial Geometry
  • MCNP
  • Define Surfaces, Make Volumes
  • Easy Replication, Restart
  • Cant Do Adjoint Problem

8
Basic Question
  • How Do You Accurately Calculate the Dose Inside a
    Geometrically Complicated Shield a Large Distance
    from a Mixed Source of Neutrons and Gamma Rays ?
  • Discrete Ordinates Cant Handle The Shield
    Geometry (Stair Steps ?)
  • Monte Carlo Cant Handle the Distance or a Small
    Size Dose Receiver

9
Air-Over Ground Problem
  • 2D Problem Covers 2 Kilometers
  • Large, Geometrically Increasing, Mesh Spaces
    in Air, Small Mesh in Ground
  • 42 Neutron, 17 Gamma Ray Groups
  • Cover Inelastic Scattering
  • P6 Cross Sections
  • Compton Scattering Anisotropy
  • S16 Forward Biased Quadrature Set

10
Adjoint Problem
  • Every Integro Differential Equation Has
  • a Dual, Adjoint or Importance Counterpart
  • Equations Are Connected Through an
  • Integral Variational Principle Functional
  • They Have the Same Boundary Conditions
  • The Operators Are Obtainable By
  • Transpositions, Role Reversals, and
  • Energy Direction Reversal

11
Solution - MASH Methodology
  • Transport from Source Discrete Sn Calculation
    with DORT (2D) or TORT (3D)
  • No Distance and Geometry Limitations to Vicinity
    of Shield
  • Dose in Complicated Shield Stochastic
    Calculation with MORSE in Adjoint Mode
  • Shield Geometry Complexity, Orientation, and All
    Particles Start from Detector Volume
  • Couple Over a Surface Around Shield

12
MASH Methodology
  • Implied The Presence of the Shield Doesnt
    Perturb the Discrete Ordinates Solution
  • If Untrue, Add a Dummy Shield
  • Rotation of the Shield Before Coupling Doesnt
    Affect the Answer Not True for Big Shields

13
Theory
  • FLUX From Source Distribution
  • IMPORTANCE From Detector Response
  • L-Terms Cancel

14
Dose Calculation
  • Need Flux at Detector or Importance
    at Source
  • Or Flux and Importance at a Coupling Surface

15
Definitions
  • Neutron Reduction Factor NRF
  • Neutron Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose Inside
    Shield
  • Gamma Reduction Factor GRF
  • Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose Inside
    Shield
  • Fallout Protection Factor FPF
  • Fallout Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / Dose
    Inside Shield

16
Further Definitions
  • Neutron Protection Factor NPF
  • Neutron Dose Outside (Gray) / N and ? Dose Inside
    Shield Caused by Neutron Source
  • Gamma Protection Factor GPF
  • Gamma Dose Outside (Gray) / ? Dose Inside Shield
    Caused by ? Source

17
Applications
  • Boxes Near a Prompt Source
  • Vehicles Near a Prompt Source
  • BNCT Medical Therapy Room Design
  • Tank on a Fallout Field
  • Small Concrete Building
  • Foxhole
  • Buildings in an Urban Environment

18
Verification of Methodology for Simple Geometries
  • 1 Meter Box, Rotated, With Holes and Gaps
  • 2 Meter Box ORNL Calculation
  • RTK Angled Box From WWD

19
Detectors
  • ROSPEC 4 Spherical Proportional Counters,
    Unfolding
  • DOSPEC Dose Calibrated NaI
  • Calibrated GM Tubes
  • TE Ion Chambers
  • International Intercalibration Effort US,
    UK, Germany, France, Canada

20
Small Lined Iron Box
21
Small Lined Iron Box
  • Unlined, Polyethylene Liner,
  • Boron Polyethylene Liner
  • 200 Meters From APRF
  • Calibrated GM Tubes, Tissue Equivalent Dosimeters
  • Learned The Value of Source Energy Biasing
  • Start More Particles That Give High Dose

22
Medical Therapy Room
23
Medical Therapy Room
  • Dummy Head in DORT Problem Gives
  • Scattering Source to Walls
  • Conclusions
  • Doesnt Make Much Difference If Patient Is Prone
    In Beam, Seated Out Of Beam, Or Shadow Shielded
  • Dose To Rest Of Body Comes Through the Neck !

24
T72 Russian Tank Model
10000 Primitive Bodies ARS Arbitrary
Surfaces ARB Arbitrary Polyhedrons etc. 6000
Material Regions by Combinatorial Geometry
25
T72 Russian Tank Model
  • The Model Came From BRL CAD CAM
  • Required Graphical Debugging ORGBUG
  • Required Tolerance Debugging
  • Lost Particles !
  • Required a MORSE Modification !

26
Fallout Field at Bourges, FranceUsing La-140
  • 80 by 80 Meter Dirt Field
  • At Corner, Rotated 160 by 160 Meters
  • 30 by 30 Meter Concrete Pad
  • At Corner, Rotated 60 by 60 Meters

27
Experiment vs. Calculation
  • Fallout simulated with Fission Products
  • Fallout Simulated with La-140
  • Comparison to ORNL Calculations

28
FPF Comparisons
29
Observations
  • Strong Variation, Seat to Head
  • Concrete FPF Dirt , in General
  • Conc. vs. Dirt Difference, Probably Real
  • Calculation in Middle
  • Agreement Generally Within Error Bars
  • Fallout Protection is Significant

30
FPF Comparison, ORNL
31
General Conclusions for T 72
  • Fallout Protection Factor 40
  • Driver Less Well Protected 15
  • Some Differences for Source Type
  • Some Differences for Model Maker
  • Typical Accuracy, 15 20

32
Concrete Building Photo
33
Concrete Building Model
34
Concrete Building, Neutrons
35
Concrete Building, Gammas
36
Concrete Building Conclusions
  • Reasonably Good Neutron Protection 3
  • Fair Prompt Gamma Protection 3.5
  • Good Fallout Protection 9
  • Stay Away From Doors and Windows

37
Foxhole Model
38
Foxhole Protection Factors
39
Foxhole Conclusions
  • Reasonably Good Neutron Protection 3
  • Fair Prompt Gamma Protection 2
  • Good Fallout Protection 12
  • Keep Head Down and Stay Inside

40
Tall Buildings
41
Buildings in an Urban Environment
42
Large Buildings
  • We Can Make a Geometry Model
  • But - New Problem, Not Yet Solved !
  • No Experimental Data !
  • TORT Had Computational Limits for 10 Story
    Building!
  • MASH Coupling Over Large Surface ?

43
Large Buildings, cont.
  • Alternate Method, QAD Point Kernel Gamma Code
  • QAD Uses MASH Model
  • Chinese Building Study near Reactor
  • QAD Point Kernel Buildup Factors ?
  • Effect of Extended Shadowed Source ?

44
Conclusions
  • MASH Works Very Well for Small Shields
  • C/E Typically 10 20
  • Large Buildings Represent an Unsolved Problem
  • More Research Needed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com