Title: PublicPrivate Partnerships: Public Policy Requirements and Assessing Risks
1Public-Private Partnerships Public Policy
Requirements and Assessing Risks
- Henry Kerali
- Lead Transport Specialist
- The World Bank
2Overview
- Private Finance and Public Policy
- Risk Management
- Private Finance Mechanisms
- Allocating Risks
- Traffic and Revenue Risks
- Future Challenges
- Pros Cons of PPP
- Some Lessons for Success
3Private Finance and Public Policy
- A key objective is to capture the entrepreneurial
skills of the private sector - Essential to ensure these skills generate
- benefits for the community
- profits for the concessionaire
- Private Finance projects must be consistent with
public policy and plans - No project should be accepted just to provide a
commercial return to its developers
4Private Finance and Public Policy
- Government must
- maintain control over policy, and
- Ensure that private capital balances social
benefits with the returns to investors - Any Private Finance project should be subject to
full social cost-benefit assessment - to ensure public as well as private benefits
- to establish need, and provide basis, for public
participation in financing - Public Sector Comparator must be used to test
Value-for-Money
5Public Private Partnerships
Low
High
Extent of private sector participation
6Private Finance Mechanisms
- Direct Tolling (BOT, BOOT, BOO)
- Design Build Finance Operate (DBFO)
- investors rewarded through a shadow toll
- investors take, or share, the traffic risk
- Design Build Operate Maintain (DBOM)
- investors rewarded through a rental scheme
- Limited or no traffic risk
- Availability Payments
- Investors paid according to availability of
facility - Penalties for closures disruptions to traffic
7Allocating Risks
- Risk transfer is key to any Private Finance
arrangement, particularly for highways - There must be a well thought thorough
definition of risks and structure for risk
allocation - Risks should be allocated to the party best able
to manage them - Concession bidding should be rational within a
well defined risk allocation matrix - not a lottery due to uncertainties in the risks
assumed by the concessionaire
8PPP Risks
- Political and Policy issues
- Political, economic and demographic risks are
beyond reasonable control of concessionaires - Traffic and Revenue forecasts
- Usually with concessionaire, but can be shared
- Engineering design construction
- Design, construction and maintenance, ground
conditions - Financing structure parameters
- The main risk should be with the concessionaire,
but Exchange risks, if internationally funded,
should be with Government - Private Sector monopolies
- Legal framework
9Political and Policy Risks
- Political stability
- Government decides to provide additional or
competing capacity - Fiscal or other measures affecting the use of
cars or trucks - Changes in standards,
- safety and axle weights
- Contract transparency, including in the award
process - lack of transparency
- reduces value for money
- deters some bidders
10Allocating Policy Risks
- Political, economic and demographic risks are
beyond reasonable control of concessionaires - Project development (obtaining the necessary
permissions) - Environmental certificates, social mitigation,
other safeguards - Some public underwriting is necessary
- Guarantees can be used to mitigate against
political policy risks
11Traffic and Revenue Risks
- Closely related to
- National and local economic and local demographic
growth - Willingness to pay by road users
- Estimated time savings
- Perceived value of time
- Dependent on accuracy of forecasts
- Long term traffic volumes
- Forecasts are more likely to be optimistic than
pessimistic
12Allocating Traffic and Revenue Risks
- Usually with concessionaire
- But, traffic is not primarily within
concessionaires control - Sound mechanisms for toll rate review are
essential - Some concessions have a traffic/revenue risk
sharing agreement with client - underwriting a part of losses if traffic is low
- sharing profits if traffic is high
- Avoid expectations of Government protection on
downside risk, leading to excess optimism and
thus overbidding
13Traffic Risk Error Drivers (1)
- Miscalculation of road user willingness-to-pay
(WTP) especially for frequent users/commuters,
and trucks - Recession/economic downturn
- Future-year land use scenarios that never
transpired - Inaccurate estimate of Value of Time
- Time savings less than expected
14Traffic Risk Error Drivers (2)
- Less usage by trucks
- Complexity of the charging mechanism (hence
modelling process) - Underestimate of ramp-up period (traffic
stability), both severity and duration - Longer-term traffic forecasts are very sensitive
to GDP assumptions - Improvements to competitive (toll-free) routes
- History/experience with toll roads
15Traffic Forecasting Risk Index
16SP Research Results 2003
Mean 70 Spread 18 - 146 !
17Impact of Forecast Assumptions
57
149
GDP 6 GDP 4.5 GDP 3
18Engineering Risks
- Design, construction and maintenance
- should be with concessionaire
- who will pass it on, or share it with, his
contractors - Ground conditions
- bidders should share costs of full ground
investigations until concession award - then paid by successful concessionaire
19Financing Risks
- The main risk should be with the concessionaire,
but - Exchange risks, if internationally funded, should
be with Government - Repatriation, if local currency is not fully
convertible, and international finance is
required, is best with Government
20Other Risk Factors
- One-off projects require higher provision for
risks, so cost more than "Basket of Projects" - Monopolistic Behaviour
- competition is for the concession, not in the
market once let - concessionaire may seek to exploit monopoly
- concession agreement must protect public interest
21Allocation of Risks
100
Maintenance Contracts
RISK TO PUBLIC SECTOR
Management Contracts
Operation Maintenance Concessions
BOT
BOO
Decreasing Public Risks, Increasing Private Risks
0
100
RISK TO PRIVATE SECTOR
22Future Challenges
- Point-of-use charging
- depends on ability to pay/willingness to pay
- New toll collection technologies
- Reliability, take-up, back-office processing
- Pricing sophistication
- discounts (frequent user programs, resident
discount schemes), peak/off-peak pricing,
day-of-week, season-of-year
23PPP Pros Cons
- Bidding for private sector schemes costs much
more than for public sector schemes - design, legal, financing costs
- Preparing concessions for PPP projects cost much
more than public sector projects - legal and financial advice costs
- The cost of money for the private sector is
higher than for the public sector - especially for "one-off" private projects
- The whole process can be time consuming
- Total cost of private financing may be more than
equivalent public sector schemes
24PPP Pros Cons (2)
- Many governments seek to increase the capital
available for investment in highways through off
balance sheet accounting - A cost premium might be politically acceptable if
the project is recorded as off balance sheet - EuroStat guidelines
- Private partner assumes Construction risk and
Availability or Traffic demand risk - IMF criteria for off-balance sheet accounting
- Proven VFM through Public Sector Comparator
- Significant risk transfer to private sector
25Main Lessons for Success
- A well defined legal framework with well
developed model concession contract - Simple and transparent procurement
- Shared risk-reward concession structure
- Appropriate Govt revenue support system
- Projects should have social benefits as well as
commercial viability - Particular attention to traffic forecasting and
public willingness-to-pay - Public sector comparator is a must
- Need for institutional capacity to manage PPP
projects (PPP unit) with external expert advice