IEEE802'3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2: Timevarying study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IEEE802'3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2: Timevarying study

Description:

Gary Schaulov, Al Brunsting, Panduit. Chet Babla, Phyworks ... A review of Roberts updated document on measuring the effect of vibration on a MMF link. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: bbn1
Learn more at: https://grouper.ieee.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IEEE802'3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2: Timevarying study


1
IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2
Time-varying study modal noise
  • Teleconference notes, 18 August 2004
  • Jonathan King

2
Agenda
  • attendees
  • agree last meeting notes
  • Presentations
  • Summary connector loss and standard link
    proposal- David Cunningham
  • Measurement of time variance in MMF - Robert
    Coenen, Scintera
  • other business -
  • next meeting date/time

3
1) Attendees
  • Jonathan King, Big Bear Networks
  • Piers Dawe, Agilent
  • David Cunningham, Agilent
  • Petre Popescu, Quake
  • Tremont Maio, Analog
  • Ali Ghiasi,
  • John Dallesasse, Emcore
  • Yu Sun, Optium
  • Jens Fiedler, Infineon
  • Jesper Hanberg, Intel
  • Ryan Latchman, Genum
  • Norm Swanson, Clariphy
  • Tom Lindsey, Clariphy
  • Lars Thon, Aeluros
  • Robert Coenen, Scintera
  • Gary Schaulov,
  • Al Brunsting, Panduit
  • Chet Babla, Phyworks
  • please let me know if you or your organization
    have been missed

2) Minutes of last meeting agreed - no issues
raised
4
3) Presentations
  • a) Update on connector loss calculations and
    standard link proposal - David Cunningham
  • David summarized his work on connector loss vs
    offsets for OFL, OSL launches and steady state
    mode power distribution.
  • Discussion of Maximum offset discussion It
    was noted that legacy links were spec'd for worst
    case individual connector loss of 0.75 dB with
    LEDs (OFL launch) at maximum 0.75dB loss per
    connector (ISO 11801 standard) suggesting a
    maximum 6-7micron offset. OM3 group settled on a
    7micron offset based on 0.5dB loss due to lateral
    offset for steady state mode power distribution
    and 0.25dB other loss. Gigabit Ethernet used a 2
    connector link model with 0.75dB loss per
    connector. There was general support on
    the call for 7microns as a reasonable worst case
    connector offset based on the evidence presented.
    There was also general support for a draft
    standard link with 4 connections 1 single mode
    connection, 2 multimode connections at a
    maximum 7micron offset, 1 multimode connection at
    below 4 microns to keep the standard link within
    connector loss budget.
  • Worst case offset position in the link It was
    agreed that having the highest offset connections
    nearest to the transmitter would represent the
    worst case for modal noise
  • Vibration of connector offset After some
    discussion it was agreed that connector offset
    would not be affected by vibration because spring
    loaded insertion and receptacle sleeve inserts
    would prevent movement. It was agreed that fibre
    movement was expected to be the significant
    factor in time variance of the link.
  • After the discussion, David Cunningham
    volunteered to assemble and distribute a draft
    summary of the agreed link configuration and
    supporting evidence for the values agreed upon,
    for discussion by the wider LRM group.

5
3) Presentations cont'd
  • b) Measurement of time variance in MMF - Robert
    Coenen
  • A review of Roberts updated document on
    measuring the effect of vibration on a MMF link.
  • Discussion following Worst case position
    in a link for fibre movement/vibration was
    discussed concensus was that the worst place for
    modal noise was at the start of the multimode
    link, after any OSL patchcord and between the
    highest mode selective losses (this is
    consistent with Gigabit Ethernet approach). It
    was also agreed that a polarization controller
    should be included in a standard link model and
    set to maximize time variation effects.

4) Other business
No issues raised
5) Next meeting
  • Wednesday 25th August 9am PCT, 5pm UK
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com