Water balance and evapotranspiration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Water balance and evapotranspiration

Description:

12. Combination model (Penman - Monteith) for evapotranspiration ... If air becomes saturated (e.g. over oceans) then wvdda = 0 and. QE = S(Q* - QG) /(S ?) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:686
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: stephe61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water balance and evapotranspiration


1
Water balance and evapotranspiration
  • P E R ?S
  • where P is precipitation, E is evapotranspiration,
    R is runoff, and ?S is a change in soil moisture
    (storage).
  • P can be measured with precipitation gauges, and
    despite the associated difficulties in measuring
    this term, it is easier to measure than E.

2
  • E combines evaporation from soil and water
    surfaces with transpiration from plants and
    trees.
  • It can be measured using eddy correlations or
    profile approaches or estimated in a number of
    ways.
  • Why is it important to find the water balance?
  • water resources (hydro, irrigation, etc.)
  • soil moisture (trees and plants, forest fires,
    etc.)

3
  • Evapotranspiration also links the surface energy
    and water balances since QE LvE
  • Recall that Q QH QG QE
  • This can therefore be written as
  • Q QH QG LvE
  • Thus through this term, the surface energy and
    water budgets are intimately linked.

4
Oke (1987)
5
Déry et al. (2005)
6
Water budget of the Kuparuk River Basin
Déry et al. (2005)
7
Components of the water budget
8
Energy and Mass Exchanges
  • Electricity analog to convective exchanges Ref
    Oke, pp. 70-71
  • Flow of electricity in an electric circuit is an
    analogy to convective fluxes.
  • Ohms law states that
  • current (amps) potential difference (V)/ wire
    resistance (ohms)
  • flux rate (concentration difference)/(resistanc
    e to flow)

9
  • t - ?a ?u/ram
  • QH - Ca KH ?T/raH
  • E ??v/ raV
  • FC ??c/ raC

10
  • where r represents the system resistance (s m-1),
    and r-1 is called the conductance.
  • Note that r is like 1/K in flux gradient
    relationships.
  • Resistance represents a hindrance to flow.
  • This analogy can simplify some calculations and
    helps meteorologists and engineers because all
    are familiar with it.

11
  • Resistances are added either in series, i.e. r
    r1 r2, such as flow through a number of layers
    (two in this case), or in parallel such as
  • 1/r 1/r1 1/r2

12
Combination model (Penman - Monteith) for
evapotranspiration
  • Ref Oke, pp. 384-388
  • This approach combines aerodynamic and energy
    balance principles to find evapotranspiration.
  • The vapour gradient driving surface
    evapotranspiration from a saturated surface
    (relax this assumption later) is ?v0 - ?va

13
  • where ?v0 is the saturation vapour density at
    the surface and ?va is the vapour density in the
    air above it.
  • Thus QE Lv (?v0 - ?va)/rav LvE
  • where rav is the aerodynamic resistance to water
    vapour transport.
  • The key issue then is to find (?v0 - ?va) and
    rav (hopefully using simple observations).

14
Oke (1987)
15
  • (?v0 - ?va) has two parts, one due to (?v0 -
    ?va) and the other due to (?va - ?va) wvdd
    (water vapour density deficit).
  • By linearizing the ? vs T curve
  • (?v0 - ?va) S (T0 - Ta) wvdda
  • so, for a saturated surface
  • QE (Lv S (T0 - Ta) Lv wvdda) / raV
  • But QH Ca (T0 - Ta)/raH

16
  • T0 - Ta QH raHCa
  • Thus QE (Lv S QH raH)/(Ca raV) (Lv wvdda)/raV
  • Before proceeding, let us define the psychrometer
    constant ? Ca/Lv and let us assume similarity
    between raH and raV.
  • Recall also that QH Q - QG - QE
  • QE S/ ? (Q - QG - QE) (Cawvdda/raH)/ ? 1
  • This can be re-arranged to solve for QE

17
  • QE S/ (S?) (Q - QG) (Cawvdda/raH)/ (S?)
  • This is called the combination model for a
    saturated surface.
  • The first term on the rhs is an energy term
    depending only on the temperature and energy
    available, whereas the second term is an
    advection or vapour deficit term combining
    dryness with aerodynamic resistance.
  • Most of the terms in the Penman model are easily
    measured raH is slightly more challenging

18
  • QH Ca (T0 - Ta)/raH -Ca ?2 z2 (?u/?z)(?T/?z)
  • Solving for raH
  • raH (T0 - Ta)/(?2 z2 ?u/?z)(?T/?z)
  • And using the log mean height z (z2 -
    z1)/ln(z2/z1) then
  • raH (ln(z2/z1))2/ ?2 ?u
  • Therefore need wind speeds at two heights.
  • In stable/unstable situations, need to make
    stability corrections.
  • Assumes similarity.

19
  • If air becomes saturated (e.g. over oceans) then
    wvdda 0 and
  • QE S(Q - QG) /(S ?)
  • This is called the equilibrium
    evapotranspiration rate.
  • Over partly saturated surfaces, we modify
    combination model by using surface water vapour
    density deficit wvdd0 (?v0 - ?v0).

20
  • QE S(Q - QG) Ca(wvdda - wvdd0)/raH/ (S
    ?)
  • The moisture flux through the canopy (stomatal,
    etc.) is given by
  • QE Lv wvdd0/rc
  • where rc is the canopy resistance.
  • If you solve here for wvdd0 and substitute into
    the equation above, recognizing that ? Ca/Lv
    then

21
  • QE S(Q - QG) (Cawvdda )/raH/ (S ?)(1
    rc/raH)
  • This is called the Penman-Monteith model.
  • The difficulty is in the evaluation of canopy
    resistance rc (resistance to transpiration via
    stomatal averages for the entire canopy).

22
Clausius-Clapeyron Relationship
Stull (2000)
23
Stull (2000)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com