Intrepreting Consumers and Producers Risk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Intrepreting Consumers and Producers Risk

Description:

Dodge-Romig plan based on LQL. Need to know the ... sample of 20, and found 2 defective parts, should they accept or reject the lot? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:559
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: rga79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intrepreting Consumers and Producers Risk


1
Intrepreting Consumers and Producers Risk
  • Stipulated Producers Risk
  • Need to specify producers risk, AQL, and
    acceptance number.
  • Stipulated Consumers Risk
  • Need consumers risk, LQL, and acceptance number.
  • Stipulated Producers and Consumers Risk
  • Need AQL, LQL, producers and consumers risk

2
Choosing an (n,c) plan
  • Stipulating Producers Risk
  • Set PR desired alpha (.05 in our example) AQL
    .015 and choose c
  • For c 1, Table G shows np 0.355.
  • We know p ( AQL .015) so solve for n
  • n 0.355/.015 23.67 24. So desired plan is
    (24, 1)
  • Can duplicate this for any c.
  • What is consumers risk for this plan?
  • LQL .08 n 24 ? (24)(.08) 1.92 1.9
  • CR Pa .434 (not too good)

3
Choosing an (n,c) plan
  • Stipulating Consumers Risk
  • Set CR desired beta (.10 in our example),
  • LQL .08 and choose c
  • For c 3, np 6.681.
  • p .08, n 6.681/.08 83.51 84
  • (n, c) plan (84, 3)
  • What is producers risk for this plan (AQL
    .018)?
  • n 84, p .018, ? 1.532 1.5
  • Pa .934, Prod Risk 1 Pa .066. Pretty
    good!

4
Stipulated Producers AND Consumers Risk
  • For the same parameters above (AQL .018, LQL
    .08) assume that we want PR 5 and CR 10,
    what is the least n that satisfies this?
  • np2/np1 LQL/AQL .09/.018 5.00
  • Look this number up on Table G.
  • Doesnt appear, so try closest, which are c 2
    (6.51) and c 3 (4.89, probably better because
    closer!)
  • Stipulate which (PR or CR) you want to be exact.
  • See which of the four possibilities you are
    happiest with (closest fit)

5
  • Set PR .05, c 2
  • np 0.818 (from Table G), p .018 gt n 44.45
    45 (round up for conservatism), gt (45,2)
  • What is CR? ? np 45.09 4.15 .21 (using
    interpolation)
  • Choose c 3
  • np 1.366, p .018 gt n 75.88 76 gt(76,3)
  • CR? ? np 76.09 6.84 0.9 (better!)
  • Can do the exact same procedure simply setting
    consumers risk exactly and solving for
    producers risk. Then decide which is best.
  • Why are we not surprised that (76, 3) has a lower
    CR than (45, 2)?

6
Challenge Problem
  • In the previous example, assume the defective (p
    6) batches occur, on average, only 30
    times/year (out of 300 plant operating days) and
    that on a given day the sample of 50 shows 4
    defects and is rejected. What is the probability
    that this batch is really ok (type II error)?

7
Selecting a Sampling Plan Approach
  • Use the Military Standard or ANSI/ASQC Z1.4
    Plans
  • AQL
  • Level of Inspection (I,II,III,S1,S2,S3,S4)
  • Inspection severity (normal, tightened, reduced)
  • Single or multiple sampling
  • Dodge-Romig plan based on LQL. Need to know the
  • average p of nonconforming lots based on recent
    data.
  • this is closest to the approach which will now be
  • discussed.

8
Selecting a Sampling Plan Lets make a decision!
  • Use Economic Model with Optimization
  • Calculate total cost given p, n and c
  • Using a prob. distribution of p, find expected
    cost given n and c
  • Choose n and c to minimize total expected cost

9
Approach 3 Economic Model for Rectifying
Sampling
  • Total Cost Inspection cost cost of
    undetected defects
  • Expected total cost

10
Lets make a decision!
  • Talco supplies ships lots of 1000 transistors to
    the US government. Some of the time (P-good) the
    proportion defective is 5, which is acceptable,
    given the low labor rate that Talco charges.
    Otherwise (P-bad),the defect rate .10, for
    which Talco must pay a penalty of Rs1500. It
    costs Talco Rs 1 per inspection.
  • If it is equally likely that p .05 as .10,
    should Talco inspect all or not? (no sampling
    available)
  • At what value of P-bad would Talco be indifferent
    between 100 inspection, and no inspection?

11
Lets make a decision (with sampling)!
  • Would a sample help us? How? What does the
    sample give us?
  • Suppose Talco took a sample of 20, and found 2
    defective parts, should they accept or reject the
    lot?
  • Is this answer invariant of the prior probability
    of good lots vs. bad lots?
  • If n were set at 20, what would be the optimal
    (n, c) plan?

12
Summary
  • Sampling can be helpful in many ways.
  • Its not easy to figure out what kind of sampling
    plan to use or when its helpful.
  • What do we need to know important factors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com