Cause and Effect - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cause and Effect

Description:

increasing divorce Rate college couples' cohabitation. Faulty Logic? Faulty connection ... What the couples have in mind are just love and enjoyment for the moment. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: engFj
Category:
Tags: cause | couples | effect

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cause and Effect


1
Cause and Effect
  • In Argumentation

2
Outline
  • Pattern
  • Logic
  • Avoid Generalization
  • Avoid vague terms or unexamined premises

3
Pattern of Argumentation a suggestion
  • A. Introduction
  • Arousing interest emotion appeal
  • State your position.
  • B. Body
  • Clarify your major argument, and then give
    sufficient reasons to support your position.
  • Indicate one or two of the more important
    arguments against your position.
  • Refute the positions you have just stated.
  • Present additional arguments in support of your
    position.

4
Pattern of Argumentation a suggestion (2)
  • C. Conclusion
  • Restate your position on the issue.
  • Present an emotional appeal for your position,
    perhaps warning what might happen if your
    position is not accepted.

5
Pattern e.g. 1 for Cohabitation
  • Blanket Relationship
  • Emancipation Relationship
  • Convenience Relationship
  • Testing Relationship
  • How do we develop these ideas to support
    cohabitation?
  • If the premise is c. for mutual understanding
  • Major Causes Love Convenience
  • Two possible extreme Emancipation Relationship
    Blanket Relationship
  • For whatever reasons, it is a chance to test if
    the relationship will last.

6
Pattern e.g. 2
  • Against killing stray dogs
  • Against religious spirit
  • disobeys the humanity.
  • a waste of our economical resources in the
    society
  • spend limited money on the medical expense for
    curing those sick stray dogs, and then ask for
    some kind hearted people to foster them

7
Faulty Logic? Simplify the issue Failure to
account for the various reasons
  • increasing divorce Rate ? college couples
    cohabitation

8
Faulty Logic? Faulty connection
  • In fact, personally I think that cohabitation is
    a way to shirk the duties of marriage but to
    enjoy the benefits of marriage. However, when two
    of young students decide to live together, they
    have to think about the results beforehand but
    not just enjoy the present time. Nowadays, we can
    see the rate of cohabitation of student couples
    increase and it shows some signs for us and is
    worthy to discuss this problem.

9
Clear introduction of problems Development by
gradation
  • (introduction) Nowadays, we can see the rate of
    cohabitation of student couples increase and it
    shows some signs? for us and is worthy to discuss
    this problem. (lack of commitment, recklessness)
  • In fact, personally I think that cohabitation is
    a way to shirk marital duties involved in making
    a lifelong commitment to join efforts and build a
    family. What the couples have in mind are just
    love and enjoyment for the moment.
  • Long-term consequences Even if the student
    couple are truly committed to loving each
    other, there are some negative social
    consequences they have to face.
  • ? Pregnancy ? loss of love

10
Faulty Logic? Faulty connection
  • Homosexual parenting results in gender confusion
    furthermore, it makes children more likely to
    experiment with homosexual behavior or become
    homosexuals in the future. Frankly speaking, I
    strongly disagree with the idea that the best
    household consists of a father and a mother. Good
    parenting is not influenced by sexual
    orientation.
  • Homosexual parenting results in gender confusion
    furthermore, it makes children more likely to
    experiment with homosexual behavior or become
    homosexuals in the future. Frankly speaking, I
    strongly disagree with the idea that the best
    household consists of a father and a mother. Good
    parenting is not influenced by sexual
    orientation.

11
Re-ordering and modifying the statements
  • Indeed, having homosexual parents allows the
    children to have plural choices in gender
    orientation, and have more freedom to be
    homosexuals if they want to. Homosexual
    parenting, however, does not lead to homosexual
    children, whereas unhappy heterosexual families
    have been a known cause for homosexuality.
    Actually, since homosexual marriage and adoption
    have been so difficult, those homosexual couples
    who become parents after careful consideration
    and screening by the social workers, I believe,
    must be responsible for their decision and become
    much better parents than some heterosexual
    parents who give birth to children accidentally
    and are thus unprepared for them emotionally and
    financially.

12
Avoid Generalization
  • As the minority in the society, homosexuals are
    not the abnormal group though. Compared with some
    heterosexual parents, who abandoned their
    children and committed child abuse, homosexuals
    are capable of playing the role as good parents
    as heterosexuals or even better. Therefore, the
    quality of parenting is not related to the gender
    of parents.

13
Cause and Effect -- In most situations, more
than one cause or effect is involved
  • Specific wording, modification
  • (100) wholly. (99) Practically
    all of
  • (95) almost entirely (90) Nearly all
  • (80) By far the greater part of his fortune...
  • (70) The greater part of his fortune...
  • (60) More than half of his fortune...
  • (55) Rather more than half of his fortune...
  • (45) Nearly half of (40) A large part
    of
  • (30) A considerable part of (25) Part of
  • (15) A very small part of (10) Not much of
  • (5) A very small part (1) An
    inconsiderable part of
  • (0) None of his fortune..(source)

14
Premise
  • According to the religious point of view, all
    kinds of lives should be respected equally, no
    matter to human or any other animals of course
    including the stray dogs. If we did any ill
    behavior, which hurt or killed a life, we would
    be bound to get retribution some day.
  • All the religions hold this view?
  • Who are we? Are the dog-killers to be blamed,
    or the dog-owners and the policy makers?

15
Premise
  • As long as seeing love and respect as our
    starting point, there will be no behavior of
    hurting lives, but replace it with the love,
    concern, protection, and the cherishing attitude
    towards them.
  • As long as we have love and respect for the
    living, we will not hurt lives. Instead, we will
    cherish them, show them our love and even protect
    them.

16
Premise not hurt any kinds of lives?
  • As long as we love the dogs we raise, we will
    will not think of throwing them out under
    whatever condition. Instead, we will love,
    cherish and protect them.
  • Likewise, we should try to find a way to provide
    the stray dogs on the street should be
    commiserated.

17
Vague expressions confusing terms
  • Every person has his own daily life habits and
    different likes and dislikes, which may cause the
    other persons dissatisfactory and unhappiness,
    but in love, you wont break up for these trifle
    reasons. So, similarly, after marriage you find
    that your husband has the habit of snoring, would
    you divorce with him? I think the answer is no.
    Therefore, the conclusion is that cohabitation as
    trial marriage is unnecessary.
  • Every person has his own daily life habits and
    different likes and dislikes, which may cause the
    other persons dissatisfactory and unhappiness,
    but in love, you wont break up for these trifle
    reasons. So, similarly, after marriage you find
    that your husband has the habit of snoring, would
    you divorce with him? I think the answer is no.
    Therefore, the conclusion is that cohabitation as
    trial marriage is unnecessary.

18
Vague expressions confusing terms
  • Understanding means understanding of ones
    personality, interest, family background and
    habits. We can know a person, his/her family
    background and interest intimately through
    heart-to-heart conversation and doing things
    together. Even if this person means to hide
    something from us, s/he will still reveal traces
    of dishonestly if we are observant and patient
    enough.
  • Only living habits need to be discovered through
    living together. However, after stable
    development of love relationship, if one loves a
    person truly so that one is willing to marry
    him/her, would s/he divorce the lover just
    because the latter snores or is messy? The
    answer, I think, is no. To cohabit as a trial
    marriage, therefore, is unnecessary.

19
Information
  • Macau ???????????
  • ????,????????????,?????????????????,?????????????
    ?????,???????????????????????,??????????????,?????
    ???????,?????
  • ???????????????????,???????(http//www.chinabiz.or
    g.tw/maz/InvCina/199907-065/199907-058.html )
  • ??????,?????????,????,N.609,Jul. 26 - Aug. 1, 1999

20
Suggestions
  • Sufficient Research, but try to avoid faulty
    inference from some statistics or singular cases.
  • Take account of the possible premises and causes.
  • Take account of the counter-arguments, give them
    credits when necessary and then refute them.
  • Avoid confusion of terms.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com