Title: LIFE Project: Costing Digital Preservation
1The LIFE Project Costing Digital Preservation
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
01101101010101011001110101100110110101010101100111
01001101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111
0100110110101010101100111
Richard DaviesLIFE2 Project Manager,The British
Library
Fourth UNICA Scholarly Communication Seminar,
Prague
15-16 May 2008
2Overview
- What is the LIFE Project?
- LIFE1 and LIFE2
- Costing Model
- Case Study Examples
- Benefits
3Lifecycle Information for E-literature
- Project phases
- LIFE1 (12 months)
- LIFE2 (18 months)
4LIFE starts to answer the question
- What is the long term costof preserving digital
material?
5Why use lifecycle costing?
- Enables evaluation of all the financial
commitments for an item in a collection - Important for digital collections, where many
costs are largely unknown
6Aims
- Better understanding of the digital lifecycle
- Plan and prepare for digital preservation
activities - Evaluate and improve efforts
- Compare analogue and digital
7LIFE1 project
- Literature Review
- Economic Lifecycle Model
- Generic Preservation Model
- Case Studies
- International Conference
8LIFE1 Case Studies
e-Journals Web Archiving Voluntary Deposit of
Electronic Publications
9LIFE2
10Aim of LIFE2
- To evaluate, refine and
- further develop the techniques
- developed in phase one of LIFE
11LIFE2 deliverables
- Economic Evaluation of LIFE1
- Revision of the LIFE Model
- Version 1.1 (October 2007)
- Version 2 (Summer 2008)
- Updated Preservation Model (Summer 2008)
- Final report
- Project conference (23 June 2008)
12The LIFE Model v1.1
Access
Content Preservation
Bit-stream Preservation
Metadata Creation
Ingest
Lifecycle Stage
Access Provision
Preservation Watch
Repository Admin
Re-use Existing Metadata
Quality Assurance
Lifecycle Elements
Access Control
Preservation Planning
Storage Provision
Metadata Creation
Deposit
User Support
Preservation Action
Refreshment
Metadata Extraction
Holdings Update
Re-ingest
Backup
Reference Linking
Inspection
13Levels within the lifecycle
Acquisition
Selection
Selection Policy
14LIFE Model v1.1 Non-lifecycle Elements
15LIFE2 Case Studies
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
0110110101010101100111010110
Institutional Repositories Primary
Data Digitised Newspapers
16Institutional Repositories
17SHERPA-LEAP Case Study
Mostly text-based objects Journal and conference
papers, and book chapters, with only a few A/V
objects currently held. Research output from
the visual and performing arts perspectives. Few
repositories hold this kind of material. A
range of text-based materials Mostly journal and
conference papers.
18Repository Lifecycle Costs
19The Burney Collection
- Purchased by the British Library in 1818 for
13,500 - 1,100 volumes of the earliest known newspapers
- 1,000,000 pages from 17th, 18th and 19th
Centuries. - Re-scanning or re-microfilming is not possible.
- Microfilmed in the 1970s
- Digitisation started in 1995-96 and ran until
2004.
20http//www.bl.uk/collections/newspapers.html
21Issues that arise from Newspapers Study
- Comparing digital and analogue lifecycles
- What is the lifecycle cost to an institution of
producing digitised surrogates? - What are the key preservation issues common
across digitisation projects of differing scales?
22Case Study Progress
- Develop analogue and digital workflows
- Terminology issues
- How can we get a meaningful comparison?
- Future digitisation costs
23Newspapers Questions 1
- Q. Is the LIFE model terminology inappropriate
or difficult to use when identifying the costs
for analogue collections? - A. No. Interviewees felt that the definitions
and instructions in the model were able to be
followed
24Newspapers Questions 2
- Q. Is the stage level definition applicable to
analogue collections?
- A. Yes.With the name change to the stages
- Bit-stream preservation ? Book storage provision
- Content preservation ? Conservation procedures
25Newspapers Questions 3
- Q. Is the element level definition applicable to
analogue collections?
A. It is certainly workable for Newspapers.
Other collections may need to consider changes to
element definitions. It is recommended that more
types of physical objects are assessed.
26Newspapers Questions 4
- Q. Are the sub-element definitions applicable to
analogue collections?
A. No.Specific library operational terms would
be used at this level.
27Benefits of LIFE
- Assess the financial commitment for acquiring or
creating new digital materials - More effective planning for preservation
activities - Comparison of digital lifecycles across
collections - Evaluation and optimisation of existing digital
lifecycles - Predictive future cost of digital preservation
28LIFE Website Blog
- Websitewww.life.ac.uk
- LIFE Blogwww.life.ac.uk/blog
29LIFE2 Conference
- Free, 1-day conference
- 23rd June 2008
- British Library, London, UK
- Register here
- http//www.life.ac.uk
30Thank you.
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
01101101010101011001110100110110101010101100111010
0110110101010101100111010110
- Acknowledgements
- The LIFE Team
- Paul Ayris
- Rory McLeod
- Rui Miao
- Helen Shenton
- Paul Wheatley
- Useful Websites
- www.life.ac.uk
- www.sherpadp.org.uk
- www.sherpa-leap.ac.uk
- www.bl.uk/dp
x
e richard.davies_at_bl.uk t 44 (0) 20 7412 7182