Title: Measuring and modelling stellar magnetic fields
1Measuring and modelling stellar magnetic fields
- John D Landstreet
- Department of Physics Astronomy
- University of Western Ontario
- London, Canada West
2Introduction
- We now turn to three major questions connecting
the atomic physics of magnetic fields with
astronomy - Which of the various atomic effects of a magnetic
field are actually observable in stars - How do we use these effects to obtain empirical
information about stellar magnetic fields - To what extend do observations allow us to
actually model the field structure of a star
3Basic observation methods
- To search for magnetic fields in stars, we could
use either the splitting properties of Zeeman
effect, or polarising properties - Direct line splitting can be detected in some
stars, but only under somewhat exceptional
circumstances typical field (in kG) gt v sin i
(in km/s) - When we do detect splitting, measurement of
(mean) displacement of sigma components from pi
components gives direct measurement of average
magnitude of field over visible hemisphere, often
called mean field modulus, Bs or ltBgt
4Mean field modulus
- Segment of spectrum of magnetic Ap star HD 94660
(Mathys) shows visible Zeeman splitting in a
field of about 6 kG - Laboratory and theoretical Zeeman patterns are
shown beneath stellar spectrum
5Field detection from spectropolarimetry
- For most non-degenerate stars, field detection is
achieved by spectropolarimetry, using
polarisation properties of Zeeman effect - As we saw in first lecture, longitudinal field
component produces first-order separation of line
profiles in right and left circularly polarised
light. - Measuring this separation yields an average of
the line of sight component of the field over the
visible stellar hemisphere (the linearly
polarised transverse field component contributes
the same profile to both right and left
circularly analysed line profiles) - The quantity is usually called the mean
longitudinal field, ltBzgt or sometimes Be
6Useful data analysis methods from equations of
polarised transfer
- If field is so weak that Zeeman splitting is
small compared to natural width of local line
profile, mean longitudinal field ltBzgt may be
found from - V(l) 4.67 10-13gl2 (dI/dl) ltBzgt (l in
A) - (e.g. Landstreet 1982, ApJ 258, 639 Bagnulo
et al 2002, AA 389, 191) - If the lines are fairly weak (often used on
strong lines too) - where B is in G, l is in A, g is the mean
Lande factor of the line, and I and V are
functions of velocity shift v from line centre
(e.g. Donati et al 1997, MN 291, 658). This
result is widely used to interpret magnetic
circular polarisation spectra, including LSD
spectra (see below)
7The oblique rotator model of magnetic A and B
(Ap) stars
- First non-zero (longitudinal) magnetic fields
found in magnetic Ap stars (A and B stars of very
peculiar atmospheric chemistry) by Babcock in
1947 - When ltBzgt is measured repeatedly for one Ap
star, found to vary periodically with period
that varies inversely with v sin i. Many such
stars are also periodically variable in light
and/or spectrum, with same period as field. - Clearly the period is the rotation period of the
star, and the field varies because it is not
axisymmetric. As the star rotates we see
different field configurations on the visible
hemisphere the oblique (dipole) rotator - Because ltBzgt usually varies almost sinusoidally,
we deduce that the field is simple, roughly
dipolar. Ratio of largest value of ltBzgt to
typical ltBgt is consistent with this idea
8Example of observed Ap star variations
- HD 184927 shows periodic variations in
longitudinal field, He line strength, and
photometric brightness and colour with a period
of 9.53 d (Wade et al 1997, AA 320, 172)
9The oblique rotator
- Sketch of the oblique rotator model of a star
showing magnetic field lines (black vectors
projecting from the surface) and the variation of
abundance of a variable chemical element over the
surface (colour coding) - As the star rotates about an axis other than the
field axis, both field and spectrum vary.
10Recent advances
- Spectropolarimetry allows detection of remarkably
small magnetic fields. Polarisation is measured
differentially, so values as low as a few times
10-4 of I can be measured reliably. This allows
detection of magnetic fields as small as a few
10s of G (in bright stars! e.g. Shorlin et al
2002, AA 392, 637) - Linear polarisation, variable with the rotation
period (hence intrinsic, not interstellar) has
been detected in broad bands (Leroy 1995, AAS
114, 79). This is apparently due to Zeeman linear
polarisation in individual saturated spectral
lines, and corresponds very well to line linear
polarisation, now observed with Musicos and
Espadons (Wade et al 2000, MN 313, 823)
11Least squares deconvolution
- Polarisation spectra of fainter stars often lack
sufficient S/N to detect the very small signals
due to the Zeeman effect. Donati has introduced
and implemented a very valuable tool for
co-addition of these small signals LSD - This technique allows one to recover very small
polarisation signals. In the case of V signals
the individual polarisation profiles are
sufficiently similar that the mean V signal may
be treated as the signal of a single line for Q
and U (linear polarisation) signals, the
dispersion of individual signals is much larger
it is not clear what the meaning of the mean
signal is (except for providing detection and
estimate of amplitude).
12Detection of a weak field in e UMa using LSD
(with TBL-Musicos)
13Broad-band linear polarisation in 78 Vir
- Upper panel longitudinal magnetic field of Ap
star 78 Vir - Lower panel broad-band linear polarisation
observed by Leroy (1995, AAS 114, 79) compared
with value synthesized from LSD line profile
linear polarisation in same bandpass (Wade et al
2000, MN 313, 851)
14Moment techniques
- The longitudinal field measurement can be viewed
as the first order (wavelength or velocity)
moment of the circular polarisation spectrum (and
the equivalent width is the zero-order moment of
the intensity spectrum) recall -
- Mathys (e.g. in Astrophysical Spectropolarimetry,
eds Trujillo-Bueno et al, 2000, p 101) has shown
that higher moments of the I and V spectra
contain useful information about the
configuration of the magnetic field under
observation - Simplest modelling strategy assume simple field
structure, fit one or more field moments
15Combined variations of several field moments
- Typical variations of mean longitudinal field
(upper left of each group) and mean field modulus
(lower right) for two stars for which both fields
are measured (models Landstreet Mathys 2000
AA) - Also shown are two other field moments. Lower
left panel shows mean quadratic field (similar
to mean field modulus) upper right is
crossover field which detects reversals of
field polarity (cf Mathys 1995, AA 293, 733
746)
16Modelling with synthesis codes
- Most physically correct method of deducing field
structure from observed intensity and
polarisation spectra is by computing spectra that
match observations rather than fitting simple
models to field moments. - Generally this requires model atmosphere and line
synthesis programmes. Both may take magnetic
effects into account at various levels - Zeeman splitting of lines,
- polarised radiative transfer,
- magnetic field effects on hydrostatic
equilibrium, - effects on convection and transport of chemical
elements horizontally and vertically
17Physics and strategy of a simple code (Zeeman)
- Zeeman (Landstreet 1988, ApJ 326, 967) is simple
magnetic line synthesis programme - Reads in specifications of star, spectral window
- Computes one or more (I, Q, U, V) spectra
including magnetic line splitting and polarised
radiative transfer, using line list and line
parameters from VALD and precomputed Atlas
atmosphere - Compares computed spectrum(a) with observed
one(s), determines vrad, v sin i, and c2 of fit - If desired, iterates abundance of one element to
fit one or many spectral lines chosen by
programme - Contains simple parametrised models of magnetic
field, abundance distribution over several
co-axial rings. With several spectra, can
optimise model
18Fit to a spectrum of Sirius
- Synthesis fits to non-magnetic stars can be very
accurate - Example Sirius
19Simple parametrised model of 53 Cam
- However, parametrised models which fit moment
data usually do not describe more detailed
polarisation spectra accurately (Bagnulo et al
2001, AA 369, 889)
20More powerful mapping methods do fit 53 Cam
- Solution is to develop powerful mapping code
which can fit field and abundance at many points
on stellar surface by iterative adjustment
(Kochukhov et al 2004, AA 414, 613)
2153 Cam Fe abundance and field maps from 3 lines