Title: Inter War Years
1Inter War Years
2The west turns a blind eye
3Learning Objectives
- Comprehend why the interwar period represented
only an armistice rather than genuine peace or
international stability by describing attempts at
peace and why they failed - Know and explain the bases of American
isolationism in 1920s - 30s, and the resultant
impact on defense preparedness - Know and explain the doctrine of defense, with
emphasis on the Maginot philosophy and the
thoughts/contributions of Liddell Hart
4Reference
- Archer Jones, The Art of War in the Western
World, pp. 489-507 - Preston and Wise, Men in Arms, pp. 278 294
5Attempts at Peace
- The Aftermath
- - High costs of War in human and material
- - New attitude of revulsion against war
- - Need to recover and build a system to prevent
war again - Out come of peacemaking endeavors
- - League of Nations principle of collective
security - - Disarmament not total, but a limit on Arms
6Attempts at Peace Contd
- True peace or a 20-year cease-fire
- -Temporary, shallow peace
- - No practical solutions
7Americans Withdraw
- Isolationism
- - Avoid being dragged into war again
- - Return to prewar strengths
- - US its own best guarantor of peace
- Isolationism deepens as the Depression years
unfold - - Economic problems
- - Reduction of military
- - Anti-military service sentiment appears
- Defense preparedness takes a back seat
8Doctrine of Defense
- An outgrowth of post-World War 1 reaction
- Passive security dominates military thought
- - Maginot Line in France
- - Fortified with integrated firepower
- - Created false sense of security
- - Stifled offensive planning
9Composition of Forces
- Land Forces
- Interwar Armies adjusted according to results of
WWI - Reforms made by losers to avoid previous failures
- Victors - returned to pre-1914, colonial type
forces - Vanquished Countries developed new weapons
10Composition of Forces
- Sea Forces
- Principle Navies United States, Britain, Japan,
France and Italy - Adopted attitudes towards new weapons was
conditioned by traditional position and potential
enemies - Future roles of battleships, aircraft, and
submarines obscured by technological uncertainty - Confusion reflected in naval conferences
- Washington - 1921, Geneva - 1927, London - 1930
1935
11Air Forces
- Sought to achieve independent Roles
- Air demonstrations of potential military value at
every opportunity - Technological advances slow until early 30s
- Deterrence not practical until after 1935
12Theorists
- Britain- where strongest against the incompetent
way the war was fought on the Western Front - Theorists included
- - Admiral Sir Herbert Richmond
- - Major General J.F.C Fuller
- - Captain B. H. Liddell Hart
- General Mitchell, U.S.- air power
- Major C.D. Barrett, U.S first manual for
landing operations - Colonel DeGaulle, France armor in France
13National Armed Forces, U.S. (Land)
- Machine Gun recognized, Truck, Tank and Plane not
fully appreciated - National Defense Act of 1920 - reverted to
mobilization plans of 1927 - Infantry Army envisioned, but no selective
service - Isolationism - Army cut to 119,000 men
14National Armed Forces, U.S. (Sea)
- Navy revived 1916 program - rendered most ships
under construction obsolete - Navy concentrated on Carriers and Air Ships -
conference limitations on Battleships - Later returned to building battleships to balance
fleet - Amphibious Warfare developed by USMC
15National Armed Forces, U.S. (Air)
- Army Air Service championed by General Billy
Mitchell (wartime hero) - Mitchell ahead of times - eventually sacked for
disobedience - Later, Mitchells claims were evaluated and Army
Air Corps was established - Strategic Bombing Doctrine Developed
- and the B-17 prototype tested
16National Armed forces, Britain (Land)
- British Army followed colonial heritage, fought
mechanization - Growth extremely slow, despite Fuller and Hart
publication in 1929 of army field manual - Result - British tanks technically superior to
Germans, but were attached to trenched infantry
that they were quickly destroyed by Germans
17National Armed Forces, Britain (Sea)
- Royal Navy reduced by politicians and disarmament
treaties - Little effort to submarines, carriers, or
antisubmarine Warfare - New dimensions in Naval Warfare were disregarded
18National Armed Forces, Britain (Air)
- RAF used to police primitive tribal areas
- Home defense handled better by RAF than by older
two services - Counter-strike deterrent force developed
- Stress of fighters for home defense came just in
time to save Britain in 1940
19National Armed Forces, France
- Fear of revived Germany dominated Paris
- France retained most powerful army and air force
in Europe - Cordon Sanitaire attempted around Germany by
France - Maginot Line constructed
- By 1940 - political struggles crippled military
20National Armed Forces, Italy
- 1922 - Mussolinis fascist government revived
prestige of military - Army modernized and highly mechanized
- Air Force given full independence
- Forces exercised in Ethiopia (1935-36) and Spain
(1936 - 39) - However, as war began Italian armed services were
in decline (lack of modern material, economic
base or morale to fight)
21National Armed Forces, Japan (Land)
- Dominated by Samurai tradition, developed along
German lines - Mechanization, mobility, and jungle operations
- Fought in China from 1931
- Army Air Force - rapid progress, but fought
second class enemies and technical developments
neglected
22Japan ready for war.
23National Armed Forces, Japan (Sea and Air)
- Carriers - great strides in development (under
British instruction) - Cruisers and destroyers excellent, torpedoes were
highly potent - No strategic bombing force (no need for it)
- Suspicious of U.S. and the lack of a stand by the
Allies in Manchuria led to East Asia
Co-Prosperity Sphere (expansion plan)
24National Armed Forces, Russia
- Badly demoralized - 1917 failure of Czar
leadership - Made mechanization the symbol of the revolution
- German help, British thought, and American
ingenuity highly mobile, infantry carrying tanks
- Supply Corps established
- Compromise between military/communist party
- Military and political general staffs created
- Air Force reborn with help from Germany
- Hitler struck before work complete
25National Armed Forces, Germany (Land)
- Deprived of power by treaty
- Army experiments and remolds doctrine
- Regular army became a cadre of officers
- Works of Fuller and Hart translated and
elaborated - Hitler gave the army more support
- Mechanization proceeded and equipment tested in
Spanish Civil War - General staff openly resumed Pre-Versailles power
26National Armed Forces, Germany (Sea and Air)
- Raeder developed new U-Boats
- Pocket battleships developed
- Bismark and Tirpitz constructed
- Luftwaffe mushroomed under Goering
- Tactical Air Force only good for Blitzkrieg, but
not for long term war
27Summary
- Interwar years characterized by military
peacetime problems (economy, cutbacks and
complacency) - Major nations treated armed forces in the
interwar years as diplomatic position - Disarmament movement acted as a brake until
collapse in Geneva in 1934 - Then there was a universal shift or rearmament,
especially in the air
28Questions?