Forest Mapping with VEGETATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Forest Mapping with VEGETATION

Description:

Data : 21 composites S10 from April 1999 to October 1999 ... October 1999. Status map. Clouds in dark blue. Ice in light blue. Bad SWIR sensors in red ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:344
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: hervje
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forest Mapping with VEGETATION


1
European Forest Map Prototype with VEGETATION
Work carried out by SCOT and KUL presented at
VEGETATION 2000 Conference with the support of
CNES and contribution of JRC and VTT
2
Objectives of the study
  • Assessment of the capabilities of VEGETATION for
    mapping forest at regional scale
  • Preparation of a European forest map prototype
  • with simple methods applied to standard VGT
    products (10 days composites S10)
  • Partners
  • JRC methodology as developed for FMERS study
  • KUL alternative approach for stratification
  • SCOT processing
  • VTT clustering method

3
Processing steps
  • Data 21 composites S10 from April 1999 to
    October 1999
  • Other data CORINE LC, JRC/FIRS stratification
    of European forest ecosystems

4
Processing steps
  • Quality of VEGETATION S10 data
  • High visual quality
  • However
  • problems of SWIR sensors
  • cloud mask to be improved
  • remaining directional effects

5
  • S10 decade 2
  • October 1999
  • NIR/SWIR/R

6
  • S10 decade 2
  • October 1999
  • NIR/SWIR/R

7
Processing steps
  • Mapping procedure
  • Stratification
  • utilisation of FIRS strata
  • alternative using landscape criteria
  • Spectral clustering
  • Selection of the most appropriate S10 for forest
    types discrimination and generation of a
    multi-spectral monthly composite
  • Stratified clustering of the monthly composite
  • Multi-temporal analysis of NDVI forest types

8
Stratification
Two alternative location of cluster means in
three ecosystem regions. A - means similarly
distributed - no likely need for pre-clustering
stratification. B - cluster means on the average
different in different regions - a likely need
for pre-clustering stratification.
9
Stratification
FIRS stratification superimposed over VGT S10
2 October 1999
10
Stratification
FIRS main regions after regrouping of main strata
11
Stratification
  • Stratification alternative using landscape
    criteria
  • fragmentation patterns, e.g. Shannon index...
  • proportion of main land cover categories

12
Spectral clustering
  • Generation of a monthly composite
  • remaining clouds in all S10 products
  • selection of three S10 composites
  • D3 August 1999
  • D1 September 1999
  • D2 September 1999
  • averaging procedure with elimination of bad
    pixels in the SWIR band and remaining cloudy
    pixels

13
Spectral clustering
  • Generation of a monthly composite

10 days composite 3 August 1999
monthly composite (3 Aug / 1 2 September
1999)
14
Spectral clustering
15
Clustering
  • Unsupervised clustering within each stratum into
    50 classes
  • algorithm developed by VTT (Finland) and tested
    in the framework of FMERS for European forest
    mapping with IRS-WiFS data
  • based on homogeneous signatures within 2x2 pixels
  • automatic sort of the clusters according to their
    approximate biomass values

16
Clustering
Likely location of the target classes in the
spectral range (FMERS/VTT)
17
Clustering results
  • Unsupervised clustering within each stratum into
    50 classes

15
20
18
Clustering results
19
Results
  • contribution of the SWIR band

20
Results
  • NDVI temporal profiles
  • definition of temporal indicators
  • distinction of three seasons for better
    discrimination of NDVI profiles related to forest
    types
  • application to the 21 S10 composites

21
Colour composite NDVI three seasons
22
Results
  • Temporal profiles of main forest cover types

23
Results
  • Temporal profiles of other land cover types

24
Results
  • Temporal profiles of CORINE classes
  • Quality of CORINE classes ?
  • Variability of vegetation phenology within broad
    land cover classes

25
Prototype of a European Forest Map derived
from VEGETATION data
26
CONCLUSIONS
  • VEGETATION S10 products of very good quality
    geometry, radiometry
  • but some improvements are still needed
    correction of directional effects, cloud masking
  • the spectral clustering approach is leading to
    promising results with simple methods and a few
    S10 products
  • dramatic potential of NDVI temporal profiles for
    discriminating vegetation types combination
    with spectral clustering ?
  • need to improve and develop new standard products
    on NDVI profiles, e.g. phenology,
  • products on land cover changes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com