Title: Inflation Targeting: The Icelandic Experience
1Inflation Targeting The Icelandic Experience
- Friðrik Már Baldursson
- Reykjavik University
2Inflation targeting in Iceland
- Began in March 2001 after pegged exchange rate
regime came under intense pressure - Followed in footsteps of many other countries
- New Zealand pioneer
- Norway, Sweden, Switzerland
- Eurozone, UK, Canada
- Krona was floated (and fell immediately) and CBI
given the mandate of keeping inflation close to
2.5 tolerance limits /- 1.5 (comparatively
high target wide limits) - Increasing transparency in accordance with the
established code of conduct for inflation
targeters - Since 2006 unconditional inflation forecasts
fan charts for policy rate - Since April 2008 policy rate forecasts in numbers
3Exchange rate
IT regime begins March 27 2001 with floating of
krona and lowering of policy rate
4How are we doing?
- IT regime was initiated with floating the krona
and a lowering of policy rate - After a passthrough period of 1.5 years,
inflation was brought down to target in November
2002 - Began rising again in late 2004 and broke the 4
barrier in beginning of 2005 - Since then inflation has never been near 2.5
- Over 4 in 35 out of 41 months since January 2005
- Now at 12
- Cannot be considered an acceptable performance
seven years on - Arnor Sighvatsson, Chief economist of CBI, June
2 2008
5Inflation and policy rate
6CBI estimates of inflation expectations high and
volatile ...
7... in spite of comparatively restrictive
monetary policy
8Central bank policy rates
9The task is not easy ...
- Hunt (2008) estimates small macromodels of
Iceland, New Zealand, Canada, UK and USA to
derive efficient monetary policy frontiers - ... Inflation stabilization is a considerably
more daunting challenge in Iceland than in other
industrial countries, even other very small
industrial countries like New Zealand. - Can expect inflation to be within 1-4 tolerance
range 60 of the time or less - Suggests that considerably wider tolerance limits
are necessary to increase the probability that
inflation will generally be within the limits
10Source Hunt (2006)
11... by any means
- Þórarinn Pétursson (2008) studies inflation
volatility in a large sample of countries,
including Iceland - Finds that inflation volatility is influenced by
- Volatility of risk premium on currency
- Passthrough (higher in VSOEs, very high in
Iceland) - Transparency and credibility of monetary policy
(as measured by shocks to forward-looking
Taylor-rule) - Based on these results Iceland will inevitably
have high inflation volatility - Credible and transparent monetary policy may help
- But it is unlikely that VSOEs and EMEs will be
able to reduce inflation volatility to the level
in the large and more developed countries
(Pétursson, 2008)
12CBI policy appears to be predictable (Taylor rule)
13... but the numbers say otherwise
Source Pétursson (2008)
14The CBI ...
- ... has increased transparency and worked hard to
establish credibility - But this has proven to be difficult
- The bank has tried to bootstrap its level of
credibility (Baldursson and Hall, 2008) - Assuming more credibility, stability, and speed
of convergence towards a low inflation
equilibrium than appears to be the case in reality
15Time path of CBI inflation forecasts
Source Baldursson and Hall
16Inflation and inflation forecasts
17Why is the CBIs task difficult?
Source CBI
18(No Transcript)
19Volatility in GDP and exports
20Exchange rate volatility
21In general, financial globalisation appears to
have weakened interest rate channel of monetary
policy Long-term rates in IT countries change
with US rates ...
Source Mar Gudmundsson (2007)
22... while correlation of short and long domestic
rates appears weaker
Source Mar Gudmundsson (2007)
23Long rates in Iceland US 3-year correlations
between monthly changes(Apparently decline in NZ
AUS too )
24CBI estimates of inflation expectations
Source CBI
25Short vs. long rates in Iceland3 year moving
correlation between monthly changes
26Exchange rate channel remains
- But speculative capital flows can cause excessive
fluctuations in exchange rate and other asset
prices
Source CBI
27Carry trade glacier bonds
Source CBI
28Carry trade overall
Foreign currency forwards
Source CBI
29Households carry traded tooGrowth in banks
lending to households
Source CBI
30Exchange rate policy of CBI
- Bank does not have official policy on exchange
rate - But numerous statements from the Bank in recent
years show that it was considered important that
the krona would not fall - Paths for exchange rate consistent with inflation
forecast published in MB - gt Semiofficial exchange rate target
- Implication weakened impact of monetary policy
- Encouraged carry trade
- Amplified asset market bubbles (stock market,
housing) - Strong exchange rate supports consumer confidence
and consumption - But CBI is in a Catch-22 situation due to fast
passthrough - 0.43 in 8 quarters, Petursson, 2008)
31Correlation of exchange rate and share
pricesFX-leveraged holdings and confidence
effect of exchange rate(?)
32Foreign currency forwards and options
33Exchange rate fell when banks CDS spread was
transmitted into swap rates
34Has monetary policy been too strict?
- Policy rate follows rule originally proposed by
John Taylor (1993). Based on US data. - From that perspective can hardly be too strict
since the interest rate channel in Iceland may
safely be assumed to be considerably weaker than
in the US - Are policy rules like that of Taylor appropriate
for Iceland? - Unlikely to be successful when effects of capital
flows are taken into account, although rules on
other economic policies might ameliorate problems - However, policy rate bites with full force at
present and is likely to have a strong impact, at
long last
35Source CBI
36Should the inflation targeting regime be
abandoned as suggested by some?
- Performance can probably be improved
- Sighvatsson (2008)
- Better models, forecasts, national accounts
- Better communication and more developed financial
markets - Better government policies
- Increased power of CBI to regulate housing market
- Undoubtedly some of this would help. But due to
fundamentals the task of sustaining inflation
at stable low level is extremely difficult and is
unlikely to succeed - It would be unwise to abandon the inflation
targeting principle - Question is whether it would be wise to set more
realistic targets - Turkey did this a few days ago
37(No Transcript)
38Iceland and Turkey exchange rates
39We must bring inflation down
- But only sustainable arrangement is to join EMU
- Can we do it? Need to satisfy Maastricht criteria
- Can we handle it? Some fundamentals need to
change