Title: Roundtable on Ethics in Research
1Roundtable on Ethics in Research
- Sharon Horne, Ph.D.
- Psychology Department
- American University Central Asia
2Exercise 1
- Form groups of 4-5 people
- Imagine you have been asked to take a survey or
participate in an experiment - Write down what would be important for you to
know about the research - How would you want to be treated as a research
participant?
3General Principles
- These are aspirational goals to guide and inspire
psychologists towards the highest ideals of the
profession - Beneficence and Nonmaleficence
- Fidelity and Responsibility
- Integrity
- Justice
- Respect for Peoples Rights and Dignity
4Beneficence and Nonmaleficence
- Strive to do no harm
- Safeguard the welfare and rights of those with
whom they interact, including animal subjects - When conflict occurs, trying to resolve it in a
responsible fashion that minimizes harm - Be alert to political, social, financial or
organizational factors that might lead to a
misuse of their influence
5Fidelity and Responsibility
- Establish relationships of trust with those with
whom they work - Clarify professional roles and obligations and
accept appropriate responsibility for their
behavior - Are concerned about professional and scientific
behavior of their colleagues - Strive to contribute a portion of their time for
little or no pay
6Integrity
- Promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness in
teaching, science and practice - Do not steal, cheat, engage in fraud or
misrepresentation - Strive to keep promises and avoid unclear
commitments - Where deception is used, psychologists attempt to
repair any mistrust or other harmful effects that
might occur
7Justice
- Recognize that fairness and justice entitle all
persons to access to and benefit from the
contributions of psychology and equal quality in
process, procedures and services - Take precautions against potential biases
- Recognize boundaries of competence to avoid
unjust practices
8Respect for Peoples Rights and Dignity
- Respect the dignity fo all people, rights to
privacy, confidentiality, and self-determination - Protect those whose vulnerabilities impair
autonomous decision making - Be award of cultural, individual and role
differences based upon age, disability, religion,
sexual orientation, language, nationality, race,
and socioeconomic status - Try to eliminate effects of biases based on those
factors in their own work and the work of others
9Exercise 2
- Imagine that you are conducting a study in which
you are collecting data on participants - What procedures would you consider before
initiating recruitment? - What steps would you take to ensure
confidentiality?
10APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Institutional Approval
- Provide accurate information and conduct research
in accordance with approved protocol - Informed Consent
- Inform about purpose of research, duration,
procedures - Right to decline or withdraw and consequences
- Risk, discomfort, adverse effects benefits
- Limits of confidentiality
- Incentives for participation
- Whom to contact with questions opportunity to
ask
11APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Informed consent for recording voices and images
- Need prior consent unless research if
naturalistic in a pubic place with little risk of
harm or if includes deception it should be
obtained in debriefing - Client, Student, Subordinate Participants
- Protect from adverse consequences if they
withdraw or decline participation - Equitable alternative activities provided if it
is a course requirement or extra credit
12APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Dispensing with Informed Consent for Research
- When risk of harm is low, confidentiality is
protected, and involves the study of normal
education practices, anonymous questionnaires,
naturalistic observation or archival data, study
of job/organizational effectiveness
13APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Offering inducements for research participation
- Avoid excessive or inappropriate financial or
other inducements - When offering services as inducement, clarify the
nature of the services as well as the risks,
obligations and limitations
14APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Deception in Research
- Only use deception if justified by the studys
significant scientific, educational or applied
value and when alternate procedures are not
feasible - No deception about research the is expected to
cause physical pain or severe emotional distress - Explain any deception as soon as possible, no
later than at the conclusion of data collection
and then permit withdrawal
15APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Debriefing
- Provide opportunity for participants to obtain
information about the nature, results, and
conclusions of research and correct any
misconceptions - Take steps to minimize harm if they are aware of
harm due to research or the delaying of this
information
16APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Humane Care and Use of Animals
- Psychologists act in accordance with federal,
state and local laws and professional standards - Supervise all procedures to ensure their comfort,
health and humane treatment - Train others using animals under ther supervision
- Minimize discomfort, infection, illness and pain
of animals - Only use procedures causing distress when
alternate procedures are unavailable and when the
goal is justified by scientific, educational or
applied value - Use anesthesia for surgical procedures
- Animals life should be terminated rapidly,
minimize pain
17APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Reporting Research Results
- Do not fabricate data
- Take reasonable steps to correct any significant
errors in publications - Plagiarism
- Do not present portions of anothers work or data
as though it is their own
18APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Publication Credit
- Take responsibility and credit only for work they
have done or substantially contributed - Principle authorship should reflect the
scientific contribution of authors - Students are typically the principle author on
their dissertation research - Duplicate Publication of Data
- Do not publish as original data, data that has
been published - need acknowledgment
19APA Code of Ethics for Research and Publication
- Sharing Research Data for Verification
- Unless there are legal or proprietary
restrictions, do not withhold data from
verification, but need to protect the
confidentiality of participants and can ask for
costs of providing data - Data requested can only be used for the purpose
declared - Reviewers
- Reviewers of research or proposals respect the
confidentiality and proprietary rights in the
information they review
20Institutional Review Board
- IRBs review and approve research proposals to
assess if the research is in accordance with
ethical principles and practices - IRBs tend to include interdisciplinary
researchers who provide notice of written
approval or suggestions for future reviews - The duration of approval is indicated - may be
indefinite or a reapproval may be required - IRBs will invite researchers to speak with them
when they have questions or concerns - Dates for submission of proposals, review and
feedback are posted for researchers
21Common Components of University IRB Applications
- Title of research
- List of primary and secondary investigators and
contact information - Start and end dates of proposed research
- Scientific purpose of study
- Description of subject characteristics (if
vulnerable population pregnant, cognitively
impaired, students, prisoners, minors, medical
conditions, etc) - Study description
22Common Components of University IRB Applications
- Description of research methods (Instruments,
participant recruitment and number of
participants, advertisements, equipment to be
sueddata collection and other procedures) - Risks and benefits to participants
- Proposed compensation, withdrawal issues
- Language or cultural problems
- Psychological or medical referral information
- Copies of consent forms
23Consent forms
- Explanation of the purposes of the research and
the expected duration, a description of the
procedures, and identification of any
experimental procedures - Description of risks or discomforts
- Description of any benefits
- Disclosure of alternative procedures or courses
of treatment - Statement describing the extent, if any, to which
confidentiality of records identifying the
subject will be maintained
24Consent forms
- If there are risks, an explanation as to whether
any compensation and an explanation as to whether
any medical treatments are available if injury
occurs and, if so, what they consist of, or where
further information may be obtained - Explanation of whom to contact for answers to
pertinent questions about research and injury - Statement that participation is voluntary,
refusal to participate will involve no penalty or
loss of benefits to which the subject is
otherwise entitled, and the subject may
discontinue participation at any time without
penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject
is otherwise entitled
25Consent forms
- Statement that information collected in this
study will be kept confidential within the limits
allowed by lawa statement that the university
does not have any funds budgeted for compensation
for injury, damages, or other expenses - An explanation that for answers to questions
regarding the research subjects rights, the
Chair of the IRB Committee should be contacted at
a specified phone number.
26Exercise 3
- Research Ethical Dilemma A participant
participates in an interview for a study on
sexual abuse. The participant decides to
withdraw after you have conducted the analysis
and are about to submit for publication.
27Exercise 4
- Research Ethical Dilemma You have published a
paper with your graduate student. Although it
was your idea and you collected the data and
wrote the paper, he conducted the statistical
analysis. He wants to be first author. What do
you do?
28Exercise 5
- Research Dilemma You have collected data that
contains sensitive information about subjects
HIV status. What measures do you take when you
want to store, transfer or subject this data to
analyze it? What measures do you take if another
investigator requests this data to verify your
findings?