The Best Interest of the Child - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

The Best Interest of the Child

Description:

Supreme Court. European Court of Human Rights. Case study & recent research shows: ... Weak scientific or subjective argumentation for decisions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: barentssp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Best Interest of the Child


1
The Best Interest of the Child
  • Strong international legal foundation

2
  • UN Child Convention
  • European Child Convention
  • Scandinavian National Legislation

3
3 main processes
  • The legal process
  • The process conducted by the Community Child
    Welfare Authorities
  • The process conducted by the family in question
    of intervention and their social network -family,
    friends, neighbors etc.

4
3 discourses
  • Legal
  • Scientific, bureaucratic
  • Daily life common sense

5
Confrontation of the 3 discourses
  • County Committee for Social Affairs
  • Tingretten
  • Lagmannsretten
  • Kjæremålsutvalget
  • Supreme Court
  • European Court of Human Rights

6
Case study recent research shows
  • Best Interests of Child is severely endangered by
    conflicting constructions of reality within these
    three discourses

7
Recent research
  • NOVA - FOBIK - treatment research team - sexual
    abuse
  • Eva Hærem, Bente Nes Aadnesen, Per Arne Rød,
    Studies of investigation working decisionmaking
    models among workers and leaders in community
    Children Welfare offices E. Backe-Hansen, NOVA,
    numerous studies about the same themes

8
Results
  • Mothers stigmatised in the Child Welfare
    Discourse
  • Weak scientific or subjective argumentation for
    decisions
  • No routines of reflexivity, co-construction,
    contrafact argumentation
  • Ethnic matters undercommunicated

9
  • Not listening or paying respect ti the voice of
    the child
  • Overemphasising negative information about
    parents
  • Not giving clear information about care deficit
    and neglect
  • Referring to descriptions from informants as facts

10
  • Gap between scientific knowledge and actual
    decisions
  • Do not discuss content of central concepts
  • Little knowledge of interview methods and biased
    information
  • Great differences in writing routines and
    abilities ....... among others..........

11
severely threatening the security of justice
12
indications in my research that the more the
families appeal for justice the less they get
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com