Hadronic Form-Factors Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Hadronic Form-Factors Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab

Description:

Wall-sink(source) Method. Put sink(source) quark at definite momentum (e.g., 0) ... Maintain equal source & sink separation from Dirichlet wall ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: robert1686
Learn more at: https://userweb.jlab.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hadronic Form-Factors Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab


1
Hadronic Form-FactorsRobert EdwardsJefferson
Lab
  • Abstract
  • A TECHNOLOGY TALK!!
  • Outline a known but uncommon method in 3-pt
    function calculations that avoids sequential
    sources
  • Demonstrate efficacy on some hadronic
    form-factors
  • Particularly suitable for overlap quarks

2
Motivation
  • Motivation for various electromagnetic
    form-factors why do all of them together??
  • Pion -gt Pion transition from perturbative to
    non-perturbative regimes
  • Rho -gt Pion isolate isovector meson exchange
    currents within deuterons, etc.
  • Rho -gt Rho elucidate dominant exchange
    mechanisms in nuclei
  • Nucleon -gt Nucleon fundamental, intensive
    experimental studies
  • Delta -gt Nucleon info on shape/deformation of
    nucleon
  • Delta -gt Delta allows access to Q20 and
    determine magnetic moments
  • Similarly considerations apply to mixed valence
    form-factors and structure functions

3
Anatomy of a Matrix Element Calculation
  • Jf,iy Current with desired quantum numbers of
    state A,B
  • Normalize
  • Compute ratio
  • Problem need propagator from t ! t2

Want h 0Jyni2 dn,0 for best plateau
4
Method
  • How to get the backward propagator in 3-pt
  • Sequential inversion through insertion
  • Pros can vary source and sink fields
  • Cons insertion momenta and operator fixed
  • Sequential inversion through sink
  • Pros can vary insertion operator momenta
  • Cons sink operator momenta fixed. Baryon spin
    projection fixed
  • Common problem is one vertex have a definite
    momentum
  • Instead, make a sink (or source) propagator at
    definite momentum, but not sequential

5
Wall-sink(source) Method
  • Put sink(source) quark at definite momentum
    (e.g., 0)
  • Build any (accessible) hadron state at
    source/sink
  • Avoid sequential inversions computing hB(t2)
    O(t) A(t1)i
  • Need to gauge fix
  • Known tricks
  • Improve statistics with time-reversal in
    anti-periodic BC
  • Method does work for Dirichlet boundary
    conditions
  • Maintain equal source sink separation from
    Dirichlet wall
  • Use time-reversal then do wall source
  • Overlap can use multimass inversion both
    source/sink

6
Comparisons
  • How does a wall sink (or source) method compare
    to say a sequential-through-sink method?
  • Examples Electromagnetic form-factors of
  • Pion -gt Pion
  • Rho -gt Pion
  • Nucleon -gt Nucleon
  • Rho -gt Rho (not presented)
  • Delta -gt Nucleon (not presented)
  • Delta -gt Delta (not presented)

7
Ratios
  • Need new ratio method of correlation functions
    (e.g. for Ds! N)
  • where A, B, C are generic smearing labels, L is
    local, Jmygmy
  • Similarly, RD N RND where D N . Note, momenta
    and smearing labels not interchanged
  • The combination (RD N RND)1/2 cancels all
    wave-function factors and exponentials

8
Computational Strategies
  • Dynamical (full QCD)
  • Nf 2 1
  • Asqtad staggered sea quarks
  • Domain Wall valence quarks, 616MeV 320MeV
  • Use partially quenched chiral perturbation theory
  • Low energy Gasser-Leutwyler constants are those
    of QCD!
  • Other calculations presented by G. Fleming, D.
    Renner, W. Schroers

9
Partially Quenched Chiral Perturbation Theory
  • Full QCD expensive!
  • Leverage off cheap(er) valence calcs
  • Correct low-energy constants, in principle
  • Must be in domain of validity
  • Extend partially quenched cPT to include O(a)
    terms
  • Mixed actions

Bär, Rupak, Shoresh, 2002, 2003
10
Asqtad Action O(a2) Perturbatively Improved
  • MILC collab computationally tractable full QCD
  • Symanzik improved glue
  • Smeared staggered fermions Sf(V,U)
  • Fat links remove taste changing gluons
  • Lepage term 5-link O(a2) correction of flavor
    conserving gluons
  • Third-nearest neighbor Naik term (thin links)
  • All terms tadpole improved

11
Decay in Quenched Approximation
  • Dramatic behavior in Isotriplet scalar particle
    a0!hp intermediate state
  • Loss of positivity of a0 propagator from missing
    bubble insertions
  • Quenched a0 has double pole in cPT
  • Also appears in mh0

Bardeen, Duncan, Eichten, Thacker, 2000
12
Partially Quenched Singularity
  • Non-positivity of a0 correlator
  • (Partially) Quenched singularity (still) present
    at mp, valencea mp, seaa .
  • Suggests not single staggered pion in chiral
    loops taste breaking not neglible
  • Need complete partial cPT
  • Vary valence and sea masses
  • Theory under development

13
Pion Electromagnetic Form Factor Fp(Q2)
  • Considered a good observable for studying the
    interplay between perturbative and
    non-perturbative descriptions of QCD
  • Large Q2 scaling as predicted by Brodsky-Farrar
  • For small Q2 , vector meson dominance gives an
    accurate description Fp(0) 1 by charge
    conservation
  • No disconnected diagrams
  • Experimental results are coming for Q2 1 GeV2

14
Experimental Results
  • Existing data fit VMD monopole formulae too well.
    Wheres perturbative QCD?
  • Dispersion relation estimates correct
    asymptotics but suggest a slow approach to
    perturbative behavior
  • The introduction in many experimental papers
    read
  • The valence structore of the pion is relatively
    simple. Hence, it is expected that the value of
    Q2 down to which pQCD can be applied is lower
    than e.g. for the nucleon
  • Results from Lattice QCD simulations can shed
    light on the debate

15
Comparing techniques for extracting Fp(Q2)
  • Form factor definition
  • Compare sequential-sink and wall-sink methods
  • Forward APE smeared
  • Sequential-sink APE smeared
  • Wall-sink gauge-fixed wall smeared (zero sink
    momentum)
  • Conclusion wall-sink compares favorably

16
Partially Quenched DWF Form Factor
  • DWF Fp(Q2,t)
  • Smaller mass close to experimental VMD.
  • Charge radius (crude analysis)
  • Exp. h r2i 0.439(8)fm2 , VMD ! 0.405fm2
  • Statistical 0.156(5)fm2 mp730MeV, 0.310(
    6)fm2 mp300MeV strong mass dependence

17
Proton Electric Form-Factor
  • Plateaus and Q2 dependence reasonable limited
    statistics
  • All proton spin polarizations computed can
    average

18
Proton EM Form-Factors
  • Comparison at fixed mass with experiment
    reasonable agreement

GEp
GMp
19
Neutron Magnetic Form-Factor
  • Comparison at fixed mass with experiment
    reasonable agreement

GMp
20
Rho!Pion Transition Form-Factor
  • Electro-disintegration of deuteron intensively
    studied
  • Isovector exchange currents identified
  • Isoscalar exchange currents not clear
  • h p(pf)Jmrk(pi)i V(Q2)
  • First lattice measurement

Ito-Gross 93
8 GeV2
21
Conclusions
  • Work in progress!
  • D!D
  • D! N
  • r!r
  • Wall-sink method (at least so far) appears
    competitive with sequential-sink method.
  • Need tests at non-zero sink momenta
  • Should probably use the wall-source method
  • Cheaper! greater reuse of propagators
  • Well-suited to multi-mass systems (e.g., overlap)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com