Title: Hadronic Form-Factors Robert Edwards Jefferson Lab
1Hadronic Form-FactorsRobert EdwardsJefferson
Lab
- Abstract
- A TECHNOLOGY TALK!!
- Outline a known but uncommon method in 3-pt
function calculations that avoids sequential
sources - Demonstrate efficacy on some hadronic
form-factors - Particularly suitable for overlap quarks
2Motivation
- Motivation for various electromagnetic
form-factors why do all of them together?? - Pion -gt Pion transition from perturbative to
non-perturbative regimes - Rho -gt Pion isolate isovector meson exchange
currents within deuterons, etc. - Rho -gt Rho elucidate dominant exchange
mechanisms in nuclei - Nucleon -gt Nucleon fundamental, intensive
experimental studies - Delta -gt Nucleon info on shape/deformation of
nucleon - Delta -gt Delta allows access to Q20 and
determine magnetic moments - Similarly considerations apply to mixed valence
form-factors and structure functions
3Anatomy of a Matrix Element Calculation
- Jf,iy Current with desired quantum numbers of
state A,B - Normalize
- Compute ratio
- Problem need propagator from t ! t2
Want h 0Jyni2 dn,0 for best plateau
4Method
- How to get the backward propagator in 3-pt
- Sequential inversion through insertion
- Pros can vary source and sink fields
- Cons insertion momenta and operator fixed
- Sequential inversion through sink
- Pros can vary insertion operator momenta
- Cons sink operator momenta fixed. Baryon spin
projection fixed - Common problem is one vertex have a definite
momentum - Instead, make a sink (or source) propagator at
definite momentum, but not sequential
5Wall-sink(source) Method
- Put sink(source) quark at definite momentum
(e.g., 0) - Build any (accessible) hadron state at
source/sink - Avoid sequential inversions computing hB(t2)
O(t) A(t1)i - Need to gauge fix
- Known tricks
- Improve statistics with time-reversal in
anti-periodic BC - Method does work for Dirichlet boundary
conditions - Maintain equal source sink separation from
Dirichlet wall - Use time-reversal then do wall source
- Overlap can use multimass inversion both
source/sink
6Comparisons
- How does a wall sink (or source) method compare
to say a sequential-through-sink method? - Examples Electromagnetic form-factors of
- Pion -gt Pion
- Rho -gt Pion
- Nucleon -gt Nucleon
- Rho -gt Rho (not presented)
- Delta -gt Nucleon (not presented)
- Delta -gt Delta (not presented)
7Ratios
- Need new ratio method of correlation functions
(e.g. for Ds! N) - where A, B, C are generic smearing labels, L is
local, Jmygmy - Similarly, RD N RND where D N . Note, momenta
and smearing labels not interchanged - The combination (RD N RND)1/2 cancels all
wave-function factors and exponentials
8Computational Strategies
- Dynamical (full QCD)
- Nf 2 1
- Asqtad staggered sea quarks
- Domain Wall valence quarks, 616MeV 320MeV
- Use partially quenched chiral perturbation theory
- Low energy Gasser-Leutwyler constants are those
of QCD! - Other calculations presented by G. Fleming, D.
Renner, W. Schroers
9Partially Quenched Chiral Perturbation Theory
- Full QCD expensive!
- Leverage off cheap(er) valence calcs
- Correct low-energy constants, in principle
- Must be in domain of validity
- Extend partially quenched cPT to include O(a)
terms - Mixed actions
Bär, Rupak, Shoresh, 2002, 2003
10Asqtad Action O(a2) Perturbatively Improved
- MILC collab computationally tractable full QCD
- Symanzik improved glue
- Smeared staggered fermions Sf(V,U)
- Fat links remove taste changing gluons
- Lepage term 5-link O(a2) correction of flavor
conserving gluons - Third-nearest neighbor Naik term (thin links)
- All terms tadpole improved
11Decay in Quenched Approximation
- Dramatic behavior in Isotriplet scalar particle
a0!hp intermediate state - Loss of positivity of a0 propagator from missing
bubble insertions - Quenched a0 has double pole in cPT
- Also appears in mh0
Bardeen, Duncan, Eichten, Thacker, 2000
12Partially Quenched Singularity
- Non-positivity of a0 correlator
- (Partially) Quenched singularity (still) present
at mp, valencea mp, seaa . - Suggests not single staggered pion in chiral
loops taste breaking not neglible - Need complete partial cPT
- Vary valence and sea masses
- Theory under development
13Pion Electromagnetic Form Factor Fp(Q2)
- Considered a good observable for studying the
interplay between perturbative and
non-perturbative descriptions of QCD - Large Q2 scaling as predicted by Brodsky-Farrar
- For small Q2 , vector meson dominance gives an
accurate description Fp(0) 1 by charge
conservation - No disconnected diagrams
- Experimental results are coming for Q2 1 GeV2
14Experimental Results
- Existing data fit VMD monopole formulae too well.
Wheres perturbative QCD? - Dispersion relation estimates correct
asymptotics but suggest a slow approach to
perturbative behavior - The introduction in many experimental papers
read - The valence structore of the pion is relatively
simple. Hence, it is expected that the value of
Q2 down to which pQCD can be applied is lower
than e.g. for the nucleon - Results from Lattice QCD simulations can shed
light on the debate
15Comparing techniques for extracting Fp(Q2)
- Form factor definition
- Compare sequential-sink and wall-sink methods
- Forward APE smeared
- Sequential-sink APE smeared
- Wall-sink gauge-fixed wall smeared (zero sink
momentum) - Conclusion wall-sink compares favorably
16Partially Quenched DWF Form Factor
- DWF Fp(Q2,t)
- Smaller mass close to experimental VMD.
- Charge radius (crude analysis)
- Exp. h r2i 0.439(8)fm2 , VMD ! 0.405fm2
- Statistical 0.156(5)fm2 mp730MeV, 0.310(
6)fm2 mp300MeV strong mass dependence
17Proton Electric Form-Factor
- Plateaus and Q2 dependence reasonable limited
statistics - All proton spin polarizations computed can
average
18Proton EM Form-Factors
- Comparison at fixed mass with experiment
reasonable agreement
GEp
GMp
19Neutron Magnetic Form-Factor
- Comparison at fixed mass with experiment
reasonable agreement
GMp
20Rho!Pion Transition Form-Factor
- Electro-disintegration of deuteron intensively
studied - Isovector exchange currents identified
- Isoscalar exchange currents not clear
- h p(pf)Jmrk(pi)i V(Q2)
- First lattice measurement
Ito-Gross 93
8 GeV2
21Conclusions
- Work in progress!
- D!D
- D! N
- r!r
- Wall-sink method (at least so far) appears
competitive with sequential-sink method. - Need tests at non-zero sink momenta
- Should probably use the wall-source method
- Cheaper! greater reuse of propagators
- Well-suited to multi-mass systems (e.g., overlap)