Title: Fuel Treatment Equipment
1(No Transcript)
2Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
3Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
- Chip or Grind (Tub or Recycler)
- Landings / At stump
4Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
5Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
- Hand Lop
- Leave / Scatter / Pile
6Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
7Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
8Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
9Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
10Methods to Reduce or Modify Hazardous Fuels
(Cont)
- Mastication
- (i.e. in-place
- shredding
- or grinding)
11Mastication A New Technique NOT!
12Mastication Equipment
- Full spectrum from
- light-weight to
- heavy-duty
13Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment
- Residual stand damage
- Bole damage from careless
- operator
- Bole damage from flying debris
- Broken limbs and tops
- from pushing
- Root damage from
- tracks / wheels
14Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- Soil disturbance
- Compaction
- Displacement
- Loosening
- Rutting
15Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- Relatively expensive
- 150 to 600 per acre
16Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- Relatively low production rates
- .25 to 1 acre per productive machine hour
17Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
18Disadvantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- Shredding / Grinding heads have potential to
create sparks
19Disadvantages with this Equipment (Cont)
- Flying debris presents safety hazards to
people
20Advantages with Mastication Equipment
- Low manpower requirement
- (i.e. thinning crews or
- firefighters during Rx fire
- operations)
21Advantages with Mastication Equipment
- Low manpower requirement
- Reduced exposure of treatment personnel
- (i.e. chainsaw cuts, falling trees,
- etc.)
22Advantages with Mastication Equipment
- Low manpower requirement
- Reduced exposure of treatment personnel
- No burning window limitations
23Advantages with Mastication Equipment
- Low manpower requirement
- Reduced exposure of treatment personnel
- No burning window limitations
- No smoke management issues
24Advantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- No offensive charred visuals or odor
25Advantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- No offensive charred visuals or odor
- No concern with chemical runoff
26Advantages with Mastication Equipment (Cont)
- No offensive charred visuals or odor
- No concern with chemical runoff
- Good control over final outcome
- (fuel arrangement aesthetics)
27Prime Movers
28Prime Movers (Cont)
29Prime Movers (Cont)
30Prime Movers (Cont)
31Prime Movers (Cont)
32Prime Movers (Cont)
33Means of Mobility
34Means of Mobility (Cont)
35Means of Mobility (Cont)
36Means of Mobility (Cont)
37Attachment Means
38Attachment Means (Cont)
39Attachment Means (Cont)
40Attachment Means (Cont)
41Shredder / Grinder Heads
- Vertical Shaft
- Bar or disk with free-swinging knives
42Shredder / Grinder Heads (Cont)
- Vertical Shaft
- Disk with fixed teeth
43Shredder / Grinder Heads (Cont)
- Horizontal Shaft
- Drum with free-swinging stirrup knives or
hammers
44Shredder / Grinder Heads (Cont)
- Horizontal Shaft
- Drum with fixed teeth
45Considerations When Selecting Equipment
46Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
- Size of Material to be Treated
- Head Capacity
- Machine Power
- Technique
47Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
- Tree Spacing
- Machine Width
- Boom Reach
- Boom Swing
- Tail Swing
- Turning Radius
48Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
49Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
50Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
- Obstacles on Site
- Logs
- Stumps
- Boulders
- Rock Outcroppings
51Considerations When Selecting Equipment (Cont)
- Soil Impacts
- Disturbance
- Machine Weight
- Ground Pressure
52Equipment Usage on Landscape Sized Projects
53Equipment Usage on Landscape Sized Projects
- Use sparingly
- Use to prepare site prior to Rx fire
- Reduce escape potential around unit perimeter
- Reduce impact of fire in sensitive areas such as
riparian zones and TE sites
54Equipment Usage on Landscape Sized Projects
- Use sparingly
- Use to prepare site prior to Rx fire
- Can be used to create sheltered fuel breaks
55Equipment Usage on Landscape Sized Projects
- Use sparingly
- Use to prepare site prior to Rx fire
- Can be used to create sheltered fuel breaks
- Can be used for maintenance of sheltered fuel
breaks if chemicals are not acceptable
56Equipment Usage with the Wildland Urban Interface
- Use to create defensible space
- between houses and forest
57Equipment Usage with the Wildland Urban Interface
(Cont)
- Reduce wildfire risk to structures
58Equipment Usage with the Wildland Urban Interface
(Cont)
- Reduce risk of structure related
- fires propagating into forest
59Summary
- Mastication is just one option for fuels treatment
60Summary
- Mastication is just one option for fuels
treatment - Equipment is readily available
- (commercially available equipment info
available from Missoula Technology Development
Center, Phone 406-329-3900, Publication No. 0051
2826, Understory Biomass Reduction Methods
Equipment Catalog) -
61Summary
- Mastication is just one option for fuels
treatment - Equipment is readily available
- Equipment is relatively expensive
62Summary (Cont)
- Production rates are relatively slow
63Summary (Cont)
- Production rates are relatively slow
- Mastication equipment does offer advantages over
other options when used appropriately
64Questions?
Contact Keith Windell, 406-329-3956,
kwindell_at_fs.fed.us