High Impact Interventions Care bundles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

High Impact Interventions Care bundles

Description:

High Impact Interventions Care bundles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: cleansaf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: High Impact Interventions Care bundles


1
High Impact Interventions(Care bundles)
  • Janice Stevens
  • Department of Health

2
Infectionhappens!
INFECTION IS INTOLERABLE
3
Quality and Safety
  • Infection is a key quality indicator
  • Safety issue
  • Risk factors
  • hand hygiene
  • aseptic technique
  • antibiotic practices
  • wound/catheter care
  • technical competence

4
Questions
  • How do you know if you are delivering good
    quality care ?
  • How do you define it?
  • How do you measure it?
  • How do you improve it?
  • How do you demonstrate you are delivering it?

5
Answer..
But why?
  • Care Bundles High Impact Interventions

6
Clinical Practice
  • Real reductions will not be achieved unless staff
    do the right things every time
  • Often mismatch between intention and action!
  • Having done the training doesnt assure
    competence
  • Staff too embarrassed to ask questions about
    something so basic!!
  • Often elements of practice carried out but rarely
    all


7
Wouldnt it be good if
  • We could demonstrate easily how and why we are
    improving
  • It was easy to do
  • We had a way of feeding back to our team
  • We were clear about which bits of a care process
    can cause infection
  • Patients didnt get infections therefore no
    needless pain, suffering, extended stay, anxiety

8
Outcome.
  • ALL patients receive the best
    care/treatment,
  • based on evidence or logic,
  • 100 of the time
  • Lancet series, March April 2004 MRSA article
    BMJ, 17th July 2004

9
But we do that already
  • If you always do what youve always done
  • You will always get what youve always got!

10
Audit blight!
  • Audit has its place but
  • Quarterly audits will rarely result in
    significant improvement
  • Audit loop not often closed
  • Focus often missing

11
  • Audit research
  • Outcomes
  • Larger numbers
  • Statistical significance
  • Longer timescales
  • Bundles
  • Process measures
  • Small numbers
  • Focus on compliance
  • Fast feedback action

12
What is it?
  • A systematic method of measuring and improving
    clinical care processes
  • based on groups of care elements for particular
    diagnoses and procedures

13
Renal Dialysis Catheter Care (2C)
  • ELEMENTS
  • No routine replacement
  • Catheter type
  • Insertion site
  • Alcoholic chlorohexidine used
  • HII 1 (gown gloves etc)

14
Compliance
  • Measure each element provides focus for
    improvement
  • Simple it either happened or it didnt
  • How often is each element performed every time?
  • Goal every element performed every time

15
Reliability comparisons
  • Aircraft checks
  • Food industry
  • Drug rounds

16
Keep it simple
  • Team effort
  • Peer observation
  • Self review
  • Do it as often as possible
  • Use run charts
  • Feedback often and agree actions

17
Charting performance - Run Charts
18
How to
  • Sell to team
  • Train to use tool
  • Small scale testing (PDSA)
  • Communicate, communicate, communicate
  • Use formal and informal ways of feeding back
    results
  • Make results visible
  • Celebrate successes

19

Sustainability - Factors
  • Clear responsibility for change
  • Change Champions
  • Communication involvement
  • Pace sequence, demonstrate benefits
  • Meets patient needs
  • Change is measured/monitored
  • Team work is encouraged

20
  • Continuous improvement a priority
  • Those affected committed to success
  • Teams have skill and knowledge
  • Focus is long term
  • Vision, purpose priorities goals clear
  • Difficult issues are confronted

21
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then is
not an act, but a habit
Aristotle
22
Inpatient safety Series
  • Bion JF, Heffner JE. Challenges in the care of
    the critically ill. Lancet 2004 363970-977.
  • Pronovost PJ, Nolan T, Zeger S, et al. How can
    clinicians measure safety and quality in acute
    care? Lancet 2004 363 1061-67
  • Lilford R, Mohammed AM, Spieglehalter N, et al.
    Use and misuse of process and outcome data in
    managing performance of acute medical care
    avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004
    3631224-30
  • Cook DJ, Montori VM, McMullin JP, et al.
    Improving patients' safety locally
  • Changing clinician behaviour. Lancet 2004 363
    2151-62
  • Angus DC, Black N. Improving care of the
    critically ill
  • Institutional and health-care system processes.
    Lancet 2004 3631314-20

23
Other articles
  • Fulbrook P, Mooney S.(2003) Care Bundles in
    critical care a practical approach to evidence
    based practice. Nursing in Critical Care 2003
    8(6) 249-255
  • Dellinger RP et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign.
    Crit Care Med 2004 32 (3) 858-873
  • Biant LC, Teare EL et al. Eradication of MRSA by
    ring fencing of elective orthopaedic beds. BMJ
    2004 329149-51
  • Mant J Hicks N, Detecting differences in quality
    of care the sensitivity of measures of process
    and outcome in treating acute myocardial
    infarction. BMJ 1995 311793-796
  • Berenholtz SM, Dorman T, Ngo K, Provonost PJ.
    Qualitative review of intensive care unit quality
    indicators. Journal of Critical Care 2002 17(1)
    12-15
  • Websites www.ihi.org, www.nip.dk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com