Title: AME 436 Energy and Propulsion
1AME 436Energy and Propulsion
- Lecture 12
- Propulsion 3 Ideal performance of turbojets
2Outline
- Turbojet analysis - assumptions and goals
- Process summary
- State-by-state analysis
- Results
- Thrust
- Efficiency
- Fuel consumption
- Effects of
- Compressor pressure ratio
- Flight Mach number
- ?? limit
3Turbojet analysis
- Assumptions
- Steady, quasi-1D
- Constant CP, ?, Pexit Pambient (P9 P1 in
current notation) - Isentropic except for heat addition process
- Heat addition at M ltlt 1, FAR ltlt 1 up to materials
limit temperature T? - Goals determine (defined later) Specific
Thrust, Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption and
thermal efficiency as a function of flight Mach
number M1, turbine inlet temperature limit T?
compressor pressure ratio P3t/P2t
4Why use Brayton cycle to model gas turbines?
- Pressure compression ratio (r) pressure
expansion ratio (Pe Pa), which corresponds to
best possible thrust (Lecture 10) - Heat input at constant pressure realistic for
steady-flow, M ltlt 1 process (see Rayleigh flow
analysis) - As always, constant s compression/expansion
corresponds to an adiabatic and reversible
process - not true but not bad either - Notes on Brayton cycle P-v and T-s diagrams
- v on P-v diagram is specific volume (v) (m3/kg)
which IS a property of the gas (we cant use
cylinder volume V as in unsteady-flow engines
since not a fixed mass of material in a changing
cylinder volume) - s is specific entropy (J/kg-K) which IS a
property of the gas, heat transfer ?Tds if mass
doesnt change during heat addition - P-v diagrams not as useful as with unsteady-flow
engines where we can use a cylinder pressure
gauge to measure P vs. t and calculate V vs. t
from crank angle to get P-V diagram for
comparison with ideal cycle (would need a
pressure gauge moving along with the flow!)
5Ideal turbojet cycle - process summary
6P-V T-s diagrams for ideal turbojet
- Model shown is open cycle, where mixture is
inhaled, compressed, burned, expanded then thrown
away (not recycled) - In a closed cycle with a fixed (trapped) mass of
gas to which heat is transferred to/from, 9 ? 1
would be connected (Why dont we do this? Heat
transfer is too slow!)
7P-V T-s diagrams for ideal turbojet
Turbine work Cp(T3-T2)
Heat input Cp(T4-T3)
P constant
KE out Cp(T5-T9)
Compressor work Cp(T3-T2)
P constant
KE in Cp(T2-T1)
8Ideal turbojet cycle - analysis
- Inlet conditions M1, T1, P1 after diffuser (2)
decelerate to M2 0 - After compressor (3) isentropic compression by
pressure ratio ?c - After combustor (4) constant-pressure heat
addition to T? - After turbine (5) isentropic expansion to pay
for compressor work
9Ideal turbojet cycle - analysis
- After nozzle (9) isentropic expansion to P9 P1
(Pe Pa)
10Ideal turbojet cycle - Thrust
- P9 P1 (Pe Pa), FAR ltlt 1 Specific Thrust (ST)
? Thrust/mdotac1 - This gives the thrust in terms of
- Air flow (mdota)
- Sound speed at ambient conditions (c1)
- Flight Mach number M1 and ?r ? 1 (?-1)/2M12
- Compressor pressure ratio ?c
- Materials limited temperature at turbine inlet
??T1 - And we assumed ideal gas, constant specific
heats, FAR ltlt 1, Pe Pa, isentropic compression
and expansion, constant-P combustion at M 0,
add heat to ?? materials limit
11Ideal turbojet cycle - notes on thrust
- ?c 1 (ramjet, no compressor)
- If ?? ?r(?c)(?-1)/ ? then Thrust 0 ??
materials limited temperature reached just by
decelerating the gas to M 0 and compressing it
in the compressor so no head room in terms of
temperature to enable heat addition) this could
happen for very (unrealistically) high ?c, or at
very high M1 (thus high ?r) - Since either too low or too high ?c leads to
Thrust 0, there is a value of ?c that maximizes
Thrust (but not any flavor of efficiency) - At this condition, T3 T9 (??)1/2T1, i.e.
- temperature at end of compression
- temperature at end of expansion
- For typical ?? 5, ?r 1.128 (M 0.8),
- ? 1.4, this corresponds to ?c 10.97
12Ideal turbojet cycle - notes on thrust
- What if Pe ? Pa or FAR is not ltlt 1?
Valid for any 1D steady propulsion system if
working fluid is an ideal gas with constant CP, ?
New term for Pe ? Pa
New term for FAR not ltlt 1
13Ideal turbojet cycle - thermal efficiency
14Ideal turbojet cycle - thermal efficiency
- Note that thermal efficiency ?th 1 -
1/r(?-1)/?, where r ?r?c, i.e. the combined
pressure rise due to ram effect compression
(decelerating the gas from flight mach number M1
to M 0) AND the mechanical compression - each
has the same effect on thermal efficiency - This result is very similar to the Otto cycle
(?th 1 - 1/r(?-1), where r is the volume (not
pressure) ratio) why the difference? Otto is
constant volume heat addition and expansion back
to the initial volume, whereas, Brayton is
constant pressure heat addition and expansion
back to the initial pressure - In either case ?th 1 - TL/TH and TL/TH is the
same for each Carnot strip in this cycle TL/TH
(PL/PH)(?-1)/? (VH/VL)(?-1), thus ?th 1 -
(PL/PH)(?-1)/? 1 - (VH/VL)(?-1) the only
difference is that Otto cycles are specified in
terms of volume ratio whereas Brayton cycles are
specified in terms of pressure
15Ideal turbojet cycle - fuel consumption
- Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (TSFC) (PDRs
definition) - (Usual definition of TSFC is just
mdotfuel/Thrust, but this is not dimensionless
use QR to convert mdotfuel to heat input, one can
use either u1 or c1 to convert the denominator to
a quantity with units of power, but using u1 will
make TSFC blow up at u1 0, i.e. at takeoff) - The term (Thrust/mdotac1) is the specific thrust,
already computed all we need to do to get TSFC
is to compute FAR energy balance on combustor
(heat input change in total enthalpy)
16Ideal turbojet cycle - fuel consumption
- Note on FAR how do we know that we can add
enough fuel to reach the ?? limit before we run
out of O2 in the air? We know from the energy
balance on the combustor, - Using realistic numbers FARstoich 0.068, QR
4.5 x 107 J/kg, CP 1400 J/kgK, T1 300K,
(FARstoichQR)/(CPT1) 7.3, and we require 0 lt
FAR lt FARstoich, thus at stoichiometric, - But typically the maximum allowable turbine
inlet temperature T4t is 1500K, so with T1
300K, ?? 5 lt 7.3, so we can never add the
stoichiometric amount of fuel - we reach the
materials limit first
Ideal turbojet use specific thrust
Thrust/mdotac1 from page 10
17Ideal turbojet cycle - fuel consumption
- Also note that FAR can be calculated via
- For ?c 30, ? 1.4, ?? 4.3, ?r 1 (M1 0),
QR 4.5 x 107 J/kg, CP 1400 J/kgK, T1 300K,
FAR 0.0155 ? FAR/FARstoich 0.23 ltlt 1 - Wait - isnt this too lean to burn? For premixed
flame, yes, for non-premixed flame (e.g. spray
flame, like diesel but continuous, not at
discrete times), not a problem - Also recall ?overall M1/TSFC
- Another measure of fuel consumption Specific
Impulse (ISP) (see lecture 10) thrust per unit
weight flow rate of fuel, units of seconds)
18Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of ?c
- See baseline conditions on Master sheet within
worksheet key values M1 0.8, ? 1.4, ?? 5,
?c 30 (one parameter changed, others fixed on
each of the sheets labeled Mach, Pi_c, etc.) - For very low compressor pressure ratio ?c,
thermal efficiency is low, so both thrust and
TSFC are low - At very (unrealistically) high ?c, very little
fuel can be added, thus Thrust decreases, but
TSFC is great!
M1 0.8 ? 1.4 ?? 5 ?c varies
19Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of ?c
- T-s diagrams show tall skinny T-s diagrams for
high ?c, banana shaped cycles for low ?c, and
fat cycles for intermediate ?c
?? limit
20Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of M1
- For high M1, specific thrust decreases since less
fuel can be added (?? limit again) - ?th increases as M1 increases since total
pressure ratio ?r?c increases (?r ?r?/(?-1),
?r 1 (?-1)/2M12) - Also ?prop 2(u1/u9)/(1 u1/u9) increases as M1
increases since u1/u9 ? 1 - TSFC increases even though ?overall ?th?prop
increases since PDRs definition of TSFC has M1
in it - biases results against high M1
M1 varies ? 1.4 ?? 5 ?c 30
21Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of M1
- T-s diagrams similar to ?c effect - tall skinny
diagrams for high M1, banana shaped cycles for
low M1, and fat cycles for intermediate M1
?? limit
22Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of ??
- As ?? increases, specific thrust increases but so
does TSFC due to lower propulsive efficiency
(?prop 2(u1/u9)/(1 u1/u9) for fixed u1, u9
increases with increasing ??) - At very low ??, no heat addition is possible,
thus no thrust
M1 0.8 ? 1.4 ?? varies ?c 30
23Ideal turbojet cycle - results - effect of ??
- T-s diagrams just show increasing heat addition
as ?? increases, no change in ?th (which can be
seen on T-s) but decreases in ?prop (which cant
be seen on T-s or P-v)
24Summary - ideal turbojets
- Compress isentropically, burn isobarically,
expand isentropically back to ambient pressure - Matching conditions compressor work turbine
work P1 P9 (i.e. Pexit Pambient) - Turbojet performance is limited by compressor
pressure ratio ?c and turbine inlet temperature
limit (??) - Low ?c thermal efficiency low, thrust low
- High ?c thermal efficiency high but not much
fuel can be added before ?? limit reached so
again thrust low (also propulsive efficiency low
because of high exit M) - Intermediate ?c thermal efficiency intermediate,
thrust highest - Increasing ?? always increases thrust but
propulsive efficiency suffers