Title: Real Time Databases
1Real Time Databases
Group Members Gajendran Mahendran
Kajitha Balasundaram
Vithiya Perampalam
Suganthini Nanthanan Group Number 13 Date
March 26, 2008
2Outline
- Introduction
- Conventional Vs. Real-Time Databases
- Preservation of Data Consistency
- Timing Constraints Deadlines
- Future of Real-Time Databases
- Q A
3Conventional Databases
- Designed for ensuring that data integrity is
maintained for permanent/persistent data and that
concurrent transaction execution is correct. - ACID Properties
- Cannot deal with changes that are very rapid and
dynamic as they contain persistent data mostly
UNAFFECTED by time
4Real-Time Database Systems (RTDBS)
- Consists of two areas Real-Time Systems
Database Systems - Real-Time Systems (RTSs)
- Timing requirements for task execution times
- Processing data items whose values and validity
change in time - Database Systems (DBSs)
- Data volumes processed by the systems -gt
organized mechanism for storing, managing and
retrieving information - Requirement Concerns durability, security and
consistency of the processed data - RTDBS is the INTEGRATION of features of RTSs and
DBSs
5RTDBS - II
- RTDBS is designed for
- Processing transactions having timing constraints
associated with them - Accessing data items whose values and validity
change in time - Supporting data descriptions, data correctness
and integrity maintenance methods, efficient data
access and management techniques - Guaranteeing the correct execution of
transactions in spite of concurrency and
failures!!! - Timeliness is more important than correctness
- Correctness can be traded for timeliness by
relaxing the ACID properties.
6Objectives of RTDBS
- Objectives
- Gathering data from the environment, processing
it in the context of information acquired in the
past, for providing timely and temporally correct
response - Correctness Requirements
- Time constraints on transactions
- How fast a system responds to a request
- Time constraints on data
- How fresh the data read is
- Database consistency constraints
7Why Time Constraints on Transactions?
- Dictate the behavior of the environment ?
specification of rates and times of I/O of the
system - Requirements on reaction times ? basically
dictating the responsiveness of the system - Need to maintain temporal consistency of data
- A transaction value depends on completion time!!!
8Types of Time Constraints
- Based on type of time constraints
- Periodic
- - Every 10 secs Sample wind velocity
- - Every 20 secs Update robot position
- Aperiodic
- - If temperature gt 1000
- within 10 secs add coolant to reactor
- Based on Value
- Hard must execute before deadline
- Firm abort if not completed by deadline
- Soft diminished value if completed after deadline
9Deadlines Timing Constraint Violations
- Three categories of time constraint violations
can be distinguished
- Soft Deadline Result useful even after deadline,
though value is reduced - Firm Deadline No value after deadline, but no
penalty is accrued - Hard Deadline Penalty is accrued - negative,
leading to a catastrophe
10Examples of Time Constraints using
Event-Condition-Action (ECA) Rules
- Time constraints can be specified using ECA
rules - ON (10 seconds after initiating landing
preparations) - IF (steps not completed)
- DO (within 5 seconds abort landing)
- ON (deadline of object recognition)
- IF (action not completed)
- DO (increase importance, adjust deadlines)
11Real-Time (Temporal) Data
- Arrives from continuously changing environment
- Data items reflect the state of the environment
- Data from sensors - e.g., temperature and
pressure - Derived data - e.g., rate of reaction
- Input to actuators - e.g., amount of chemicals,
coolant - Archival data - e.g., history of (interactions
with) environment - Has observed time and validity interval
- Users of temporal data need to see temporally
valid views of the data (state of the
environment) - When must the data be temporally consistent?
- ideally, at all times
- in practice, only when they are used by
transactions!!!
12Time Constraints on Data
- Data perceived by the controlling system must be
consistent with the actual data - how closely is the data read by a transaction
models the environment? - Requirements
- Timely monitoring of the environment
- Timely processing of sensed information
- Timely derivation of needed data
- Temporal Consistency Measurement
- absolute consistency freshness of data between
actual state and its representation - relative consistency correlation among data
accessed by a transaction
13Time Constraints on Data - II
- Absolute consistency is measured by Absolute
Validity Interval (AVI) state of environment and
image in DB - Given (value, avi, ts) ? current time ts lt
avi - Relative consistency is measured by Relative
Validity Interval (RVI) data used to derive
other data - Given (value, avi, ts) and (value, avi, ts) ?
ts ts lt rvi
14Time Constraints on Data - III
- Example
- Data object is specified by
- (value, absolute validity interval, time-stamp)
- Interested in temperature and pressure with RVI
of 5 - Let current time 100
- temperature (347, 10, 95) and pressure (50,
20, 98) - ? temporally consistent
- temperature (347, 10, 98) and pressure (50,
20, 91) - ? temporally inconsistent
15Database Consistency
- Concurrency Control
- Control of interaction among concurrent
transactions to preserve database consistency - Coordinating read write transactions to shared
data in DBSs - Concurrency control protocols for DBS Vs. RTDBS
16Concurrency Control
- Popular Concurrency Control Serializability
- Sequence of DB Operations serial transaction
schedule ? serializable - Limits degree of multiprogramming
- Introduces blocking and restarts of transactions
- But data is short lived!!!
17Approaches to Concurrency
- Key Issue of System Degradation in RTDBSs
- aborts and restarts of transactions.
- caused by concurrency control protocols trying to
resolve conflicts between transactions - Lock-Based Protocols (i.e. 2PL)
- Optimistic Concurrency Control (OCC) Protocols
18Lock-Based Protocol
- Locks are used to synchronize concurrent actions
- Two-Phase Locking (2PL)
- all locking operations precedes the first unlock
operation in the transaction - expanding phase (locks are acquired)
- shrinking phase (locks are released)
- suffers from deadlock
- priority inversion
- UNSATISFACTORY for RTDBS
19Dead-Lock
- Goal Largest number of transactions can meet
their deadline - Abort transaction that has already passed
- Abort transaction with longest deadline
- Abort transaction that is least critical
20Priority Inversion
- High priority tasks are blocked by low priority
tasks - Impacts real-time scheduling algorithms
(ineffective) - Solutions
- Wait Promote
- High Priority (aborts)
- Leads to cyclic restart
- Conditional Restart (measure the slack time)
- No single strategy excels
- Depends on applications, avail. of resources
cost of transaction restart!
21OCC Protocol - I
- 3 Phases
- 1. Read 2. Validate 3. Write
- Rules
- Given T1 be serialized before T2
- R/W rule Data Items to be written by T1 should
not have already been read by T2 - W/W rule T1s write should not overwrite T2s
writes
22OCC Protocol - Validation
- Check for Rule Violations
- T1 completes execution before T2 starts (no
interleaving) - W of T1 does not intersect R of T2 (R/W)
- T1 finishes W before T2 starts validation (W/W)
- Conflict Resolution if Rule is violated!
- ? Validation fails!
- ? (broadcasting commit, etc.)
23Applications
- military command and control
- Aerospace systems
- aircraft control
- traffic control
- telecommunication and computer network management
- telephone directory service systems
- computer integrated manufacturing (CIM)
- factory automation and robotics
- workflow systems
- medical monitoring
- stock arbitrage systems
- multimedia systems
24References
- References
- 1 Azer, B., Kwei-Jay, L., Sang, H.S.,
Real-Time Database Systems Issues and
Applications, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1997. - 2 Kam-Yiu, L., Tei-Wei, L., Real-Time Database
Systems Architecture and Techniques, Kluwer
Academic Pub., 2001. - 3 Norman, W.P., Active Rules in Database
Systems, Springer., 1998. - 4 Piotr Krzyzagorski., Concurrency Control in
Real-Time Systems, 2005. - http//www.edbt2000.uni-konstanz.de/phd-workshop/p
apers/Krzyzagorski.pdf - 5 Matthew, R.L., Young-Kuk, K., Sang, H.S.,
Managing Contention and Timing Constraints in a
Real-Time Database System, Univeristy of
Virginia, Charlottesville, 1995 IEEE - 6 http//ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel3/3569/10678/004
95222.pdf
25Question Answer