Title: Definition of International Humanitarian Law IHL
1Definition of International Humanitarian Law (IHL)
- "International humanitarian law is a set of
rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to
limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects
persons who are not or are no longer
participating in the hostilities, and regulates
the conduct of hostilities."
2 Complementarity of IHL and HRL
- COMPLEMENTARY
- PROVISIONS
- Right to Life
- Prohibition against Torture
- Prohibition against Ill-treatment
- Fair Trial
- IHL
- Protection of wounded, sick and shipwrecked
- Protection of POWs and civilian internees
- Conduct of Hostilities
- HUMAN
- RIGHTS
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Assembly
- Right to Marry
3IHL obligations relevant to conventional arms
transfers
- To "respect and ensure respect" for humanitarian
law (common Article 1, GC I-IV, API) - Before authorizing an arms transfer, States
should - assess the recipient's likely respect for
international humanitarian law - not authorize a transfer if the weapons are
likely to be used for serious violations of
humanitarian law
4"States should make respect for international
humanitarian law one of the fundamental criteria
on which arms transfer decisions are assessed.
They are encouraged to incorporate such criteria
into national laws or policies and into regional
and global norms on arms transfers " States
party to the Geneva Conventions and RCRC
Movement, 2003.
5 IHL criteria in existing arms transfer
instruments
- (EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports -1998)
- OSCE Document on SALW (2000)
- Wassenaar Arrangement Best Practice Guidelines
for SALW Exports (2002) - OAS Model Regulations for the Control of Brokers
of Firearms (2003) - Nairobi Protocol Best Practice Guidelines (2005)
- Code of Conduct of the Central American States on
the transfer of arms (2005) - ECOWAS Convention on SALW (2006)
6(No Transcript)
7IHL obligations relevant to conventional arms
transfers
- Treaty obligations, including
- 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
(Amended Protocol II and Protocol IV) - 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of
Anti-Personnel Mines - (2008 Cluster Munitions Convention)
- Customary IHL prohibitions
- weapons that cause superfluous injury/unnecessary
suffering - weapons which are indiscriminate (incapable of
distinguishing between civilians and military
targets, whose effects cannot be limited as
required)
8Elements of an ATT based on States' existing IHL
obligations
- A requirement not to transfer arms or ammunition
likely to be used to commit serious violations of
international humanitarian law - A requirement not to transfer weapons or
ammunition whose use has been prohibited - A requirement not to transfer weapons or
ammunition that are of a nature to cause
superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or
that are by nature indiscriminate - A reference to existing prohibitions on the
transfer of specific weapons
9An assessment of the risk that arms will be used
to violate IHL should include an inquiry into
- the recipients record of respect for IHL
- the recipient's intentions as expressed through
formal commitments - the recipient's capacity to ensure that the arms
or equipment transferred are used in a manner
consistent with IHL and are not diverted or
transferred to other destinations where they
might be used for serious violations of this law
10Specific indicators - Record of respect for IHL
- 1. Whether a recipient which is, or has been,
engaged in an armed conflict has committed
serious violations of IHL. - (responsibility of the recipient changed
circumstances) - 2. Whether a recipient which is, or has been,
engaged in an armed conflict has taken all
feasible measures to prevent violations of IHL or
cause them to cease, including by punishing those
responsible. - (changed military orders penal sanctions
actions to protect civilians expressions of
regret reparations)
11Specific indicators - Formal commitments
- 3. Whether the recipient has made a formal
commitment to apply the rules of IHL and taken
appropriate measures for their implementation. - (ratification of IHL instruments
implementation) - 4. Whether the recipient country has in place the
legal, judicial and administrative measures
necessary for the repression of serious
violations of IHL. - (national legislation that prohibit and punish
violations cooperation in criminal proceedings
relating to violations)
12Specific indicators - Formal commitments
- 5. Whether the recipient disseminates IHL, in
particular to its armed forces and other arms
bearers, and has integrated IHL into its military
doctrine, manuals and instructions. - (education and training mechanisms to prevent,
suppress and punish violations) - 6. Whether the recipient has taken relevant
measures to prevent the recruitment of children
into the armed forces or armed groups and their
participation in hostilities. - (known recruitment of children ratification of
relevant legal instruments minimum age measures
to prohibit and punish recruitment of children)
13Specific indicators - Capacity to ensure that
weapons will be used in accordance with IHL
- 7. Whether accountable authority structures exist
with the capacity and will to ensure respect for
IHL. - (command and control structures functioning
judicial system risk of change in
government/authority structures) - 8. Whether the arms or military equipment
requested are commensurate with the operational
requirements and capacities of the stated
end-user. - (capacity to use arms in accordance with IHL
capacity to maintain and deploy equipment
type/quantity of equipment commensurate with
military requirements e.g. inventory and force
structure)
14Specific indicators - Capacity to ensure that
weapons will be used in accordance with IHL
- 9. Whether the recipient maintains strict and
effective control over its arms and military
equipment and their further transfer. - (previous known or suspected cases of
unauthorized re-transfers or diversion adequate
procedures for stockpile management and security
known problems of theft, leakages, illicit
trafficking effective arms transfer
control system)