Definition of International Humanitarian Law IHL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Definition of International Humanitarian Law IHL

Description:

'International humanitarian law is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian ... of unauthorized re-transfers or diversion; adequate procedures for stockpile ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:424
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: CICR50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Definition of International Humanitarian Law IHL


1
Definition of International Humanitarian Law (IHL)
  • "International humanitarian law is a set of
    rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to
    limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects
    persons who are not or are no longer
    participating in the hostilities, and regulates
    the conduct of hostilities."

2
Complementarity of IHL and HRL
  • COMPLEMENTARY
  • PROVISIONS
  • Right to Life
  • Prohibition against Torture
  • Prohibition against Ill-treatment
  • Fair Trial
  • IHL
  • Protection of wounded, sick and shipwrecked
  • Protection of POWs and civilian internees
  • Conduct of Hostilities
  • HUMAN
  • RIGHTS
  • Freedom of Expression
  • Freedom of Assembly
  • Right to Marry

3
IHL obligations relevant to conventional arms
transfers
  • To "respect and ensure respect" for humanitarian
    law (common Article 1, GC I-IV, API)
  • Before authorizing an arms transfer, States
    should
  • assess the recipient's likely respect for
    international humanitarian law
  • not authorize a transfer if the weapons are
    likely to be used for serious violations of
    humanitarian law

4
"States should make respect for international
humanitarian law one of the fundamental criteria
on which arms transfer decisions are assessed.
They are encouraged to incorporate such criteria
into national laws or policies and into regional
and global norms on arms transfers " States
party to the Geneva Conventions and RCRC
Movement, 2003.
5
IHL criteria in existing arms transfer
instruments
  • (EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports -1998)
  • OSCE Document on SALW (2000)
  • Wassenaar Arrangement Best Practice Guidelines
    for SALW Exports (2002)
  • OAS Model Regulations for the Control of Brokers
    of Firearms (2003)
  • Nairobi Protocol Best Practice Guidelines (2005)
  • Code of Conduct of the Central American States on
    the transfer of arms (2005)
  • ECOWAS Convention on SALW (2006)

6
(No Transcript)
7
IHL obligations relevant to conventional arms
transfers
  • Treaty obligations, including
  • 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
    (Amended Protocol II and Protocol IV)
  • 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of
    Anti-Personnel Mines
  • (2008 Cluster Munitions Convention)
  • Customary IHL prohibitions
  • weapons that cause superfluous injury/unnecessary
    suffering
  • weapons which are indiscriminate (incapable of
    distinguishing between civilians and military
    targets, whose effects cannot be limited as
    required)

8
Elements of an ATT based on States' existing IHL
obligations
  • A requirement not to transfer arms or ammunition
    likely to be used to commit serious violations of
    international humanitarian law
  • A requirement not to transfer weapons or
    ammunition whose use has been prohibited
  • A requirement not to transfer weapons or
    ammunition that are of a nature to cause
    superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or
    that are by nature indiscriminate
  • A reference to existing prohibitions on the
    transfer of specific weapons

9
An assessment of the risk that arms will be used
to violate IHL should include an inquiry into
  • the recipients record of respect for IHL
  • the recipient's intentions as expressed through
    formal commitments
  • the recipient's capacity to ensure that the arms
    or equipment transferred are used in a manner
    consistent with IHL and are not diverted or
    transferred to other destinations where they
    might be used for serious violations of this law

10
Specific indicators - Record of respect for IHL
  • 1. Whether a recipient which is, or has been,
    engaged in an armed conflict has committed
    serious violations of IHL.
  • (responsibility of the recipient changed
    circumstances)
  • 2. Whether a recipient which is, or has been,
    engaged in an armed conflict has taken all
    feasible measures to prevent violations of IHL or
    cause them to cease, including by punishing those
    responsible.
  • (changed military orders penal sanctions
    actions to protect civilians expressions of
    regret reparations)

11
Specific indicators - Formal commitments
  • 3. Whether the recipient has made a formal
    commitment to apply the rules of IHL and taken
    appropriate measures for their implementation.
  • (ratification of IHL instruments
    implementation)
  • 4. Whether the recipient country has in place the
    legal, judicial and administrative measures
    necessary for the repression of serious
    violations of IHL.
  • (national legislation that prohibit and punish
    violations cooperation in criminal proceedings
    relating to violations)

12
Specific indicators - Formal commitments
  • 5. Whether the recipient disseminates IHL, in
    particular to its armed forces and other arms
    bearers, and has integrated IHL into its military
    doctrine, manuals and instructions.
  • (education and training mechanisms to prevent,
    suppress and punish violations)
  • 6. Whether the recipient has taken relevant
    measures to prevent the recruitment of children
    into the armed forces or armed groups and their
    participation in hostilities.
  • (known recruitment of children ratification of
    relevant legal instruments minimum age measures
    to prohibit and punish recruitment of children)

13
Specific indicators - Capacity to ensure that
weapons will be used in accordance with IHL
  • 7. Whether accountable authority structures exist
    with the capacity and will to ensure respect for
    IHL.
  • (command and control structures functioning
    judicial system risk of change in
    government/authority structures)
  • 8. Whether the arms or military equipment
    requested are commensurate with the operational
    requirements and capacities of the stated
    end-user.
  • (capacity to use arms in accordance with IHL
    capacity to maintain and deploy equipment
    type/quantity of equipment commensurate with
    military requirements e.g. inventory and force
    structure)

14
Specific indicators - Capacity to ensure that
weapons will be used in accordance with IHL
  • 9. Whether the recipient maintains strict and
    effective control over its arms and military
    equipment and their further transfer.
  • (previous known or suspected cases of
    unauthorized re-transfers or diversion adequate
    procedures for stockpile management and security
    known problems of theft, leakages, illicit
    trafficking effective arms transfer
    control system)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com