Major provisions of law and regs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Major provisions of law and regs

Description:

What is prohibited: direct take only ... Are Federal agencies subject: for the present, yes ... ( bald eagles and ospreys, or colonial nests) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: PGAR1
Category:
Tags: bald | eagle | eagles | law | major | provisions | regs

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Major provisions of law and regs


1
Major provisions of law and regs
  • Whats covered adults, young, eggs, and nests
  • What is prohibited direct take only
  • What is the nature of the law strict liability
    with criminal prosecution
  • Are Federal agencies subject for the present,
    yes
  • What birds are covered all but exotics
    (starlings, etc), pigeons, and quails, grouse,
    partridge

2
Executive Order 13186
  • Conservation of Migratory Birds
  • Directs Federal Agencies to Execute MOUs with FWS
  • Federal aid grant programs exempted
  • At FWS request, FWHA elected to develop a draft
    MOU
  • Two year effort with input from Counsel

3
PICTURE A DOG CHASING TAIL
  • MOU on MBTA re EO
  • Dead in the water
  • Programmatic Permit
  • Waiting to see how the DOD does with theirs
  • FWS developed a draft Programmatic Permit for
    Federal agencies not released
  • Construction, Operation and Maintenance

4
Major provisions of MOU
  • The FWS and FHWA agree that federally-funded
    highway construction projects and maintenance
    activities are necessary and could result in
    short-term or periodic, unintentional take of
    migratory birds

5
Both Agencies Agree to
  • 1.   Perform timely, appropriate, environmental
    analysis and review of Federal actions required
    by NEPA or other established environmental review
    processes to evaluate the effects of agency
    actions and Federal-aid highway projects on
    migratory birds, with emphasis on species of
    concern. Consider habitats needed for
    reproduction, migration, and overwintering. This
    includes activities directly related to
    federally-funded highway project planning,
    construction, and operation.

6
Projects likely to take birds
  • Examples of such projects and measures include
  •  construction of new highways on new alignment
  • bridge maintenance (e.g., painting, cleaning,
    etc.)
  • bridge rehabilitation (e.g., deck replacement,
    replacement of piers, embankment protection)
  •  bridge replacements
  •  highway reconstruction (e.g., resurfacing,
    widening for safety, adding lanes, minor
    realignments for safety, adding access, etc.)
  •   emergency repairs

7
Projects not likely to take birds
  • 1.   Signing and striping, Resurfacing.
  • 2.   Rehabilitation of existing highway
    facilities within existing row.
  •  3.  Minor safety projects within existing row.
  •  4.  Other projects which do not involve the
    removal of natural vegetative communities  
  • 5. Management of rest areas and row, excluding
    mitigation sites

8
Minimization and avoidance
  • 1.  Not disturbing, destroying, or removing
    active nests during the nesting season
  • 2.  Avoiding the removal of unoccupied, inactive
    nests, if practicable, from the construction
    site. (bald eagles and ospreys, or colonial
    nests)
  • 3.   Preventing the establishment of active nests
    during the nesting season on highway structures
  •  4. No collecting, capturing, relocating, or
    transporting birds, eggs, young, or active nests
    without a permit
  • Use non attractive vegetation for plantings in row

9
What should go in NEPA
  • Habitat analysis
  • Species list
  • Likely mechanisms of take
  • Mitigative measures
  • Avoidance
  • Minimization
  • Acknowledge we have to advise contractor

10
NEPA
  • MBTA impacts should not automatically disallow a
    Catex.
  • Analysis of MBTA effects and prohibitions on take
    are not exempted at Catex level.
  • Coordination with Service still necessary on all
    actions likely to take MiBs.
  • NEPA analysis should consider population level
    effects

11
What is a significant effect
  • A significant take or effect is one which will
    limit the ability of a local or regional
    population to sustain itself
  • This should apply to take of habitat as well as
    direct take
  • Habitat takes are outside the authority of the
    MBTA
  • Focus on Birds of Conservation Concern list

12
What the FWS should do
  • The FWS should provide information on species
    likely to nest in different habitat types
  • Habitat surveys impracticable during most of
    nesting season but may be necessary
  • FWS should have list of birds of special concern
  • Review and respond to NEPA analysis

13
Whats happening now
  • Letter from the FWS requesting we proceed with
    MOU
  • Mary P wants us to play nice, but still say no to
    MOU for now
  • DOJ has not formalized a new interpretation of
    the law and isnt likely to before November
  • Were stuck in the middle for now

14
MBTA Web Resources
  • http//ipl.unm.edu/cwl/fedbook/mbta.html
  • Migratory Bird Treaty Act
  • http//migratorybirds.fws.gov/EO5Cmigbrdeo.pdf
  • Executive order
  • http//www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/migbird.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com