Title: Worker
1Workers Compensation and the Undocumented
Worker
- Alfredo J. Antezana, Esq
- Antezana Antezana, LLC
2Overview
- Counseling a Spanish Speaking Client
- Design Kitchen v. Lagos
- Medical Concerns to the Spanish Community
3Counseling a Spanish Speaking Client
- Representation means more than being a counselor
- No Pain and Suffering in Workers Compensation
- Checks delivered to office
4Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. Natl Labor
Relations Bd.535 U.S. 137 (2002)
- FACTS
- An employer terminated an employee, who was
undocumented, for engaging in pro union
activities. - The discharged worker filed suit for back pay.
- The employer argued that the discharged employee
was not entitled to back pay because he was
undocumented.
5Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. Natl Labor
Relations Bd.535 U.S. 137 (2002)
- 5 to 4 Decision
- The Supreme Court held that an undocumented
worker had no right to recover wages under a
federal statute because it conflicts with
immigration laws
6What is an undocumented worker?
- An individual who does not have a valid social
security account number card under 8 U.S.C.
1324a(b)(C)(i)
7Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005
- FACTS
- Lagos injured his left hand while operating a saw
under the employment of Design Kitchen and Baths - The injury required medical treatment, including
2 surgical procedures - A Workers Compensation claim was filed
8Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005
- Issues Raised at the hearing level by the
employer/insurance company - Accidental injury
- Causal relationship
- AWW
- Proper insurer
- Undocumented worker
9Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005
- Issues for the Court of Appeals
- Does the undocumented worker have workers
compensation rights?
10Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005
- 6 to 1 Decision
- Undocumented workers are covered employees under
the Act and are eligible to receive workers
compensation benefits
11Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005
- Clear language of the statute
- Legislative History
- Purpose of the Act
- Public Policy
12Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005Statute Language
- The Court agreed that 9-202 is not ambiguous
- The clear and unambiguous language of 9-202
encompasses undocumented aliens - The statute provides a covered employee is
characterized by two elements an express/implied
contract of hire and is in service of an
employer.
13Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005Legislative History
- 21 defined a covered employee as every
personwhether lawfully or unlawfully employed - Revisions of 21, now 9-202, were intended to be
made without substantive change
14Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005Purpose of the Act
- to protect employees, employers, and the public
alike.
15Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 2005Public Policy
- If no coverage under statute then no relief for
injuries OR sue in tort - Encourage a safe work environment with no fear of
retribution
16Design Kitchen v. LagosCourt of Appeals of MD
Filed Sept. 12, 20052 Interpretations
- Undocumented workers are entitled to all benefits
except voc rehab (status quo)
- Undocumented workers are entitled to all benefits
since they are covered employees per the Court of
Appeals
17Medical Concerns
- The need for a Spanish speaking doctor
- The impact of Chiropractic care
- The cultural belief of 100 recovery
- The inability to provide proper medical history
to doctors
18Any Questions