Title: International Seminar on Drug Advertising Canadian Experience
1 International Seminar on Drug
AdvertisingCanadian Experience
- Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency and
- Pan American Health Organization
- Brasilia, Brazil
- April, 2005
- Erwin Friesen, Pharm.D, FCSHP
- efriesen_at_cha.ab.ca
2 Presentation Outline
- Overview of Canada and Health Care System
- Arguments to Allow and Prohibit Direct to
Consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs
- Current status of DTC advertising in Canada
- Reasons for Canadian decision
- Canadian challenges with advertising
- Difference in impact of advertising in Canada/US
- Questions
3(No Transcript)
4Canada Health Overview
- Life expectancy 2004 (Source - WHO)
- Canada 79.8 years
- USA 77.3 years
- All citizens are covered by the government for a
wide range of services (e.g. hospitals,
physicians) regardless of financial status - People have access to health care regardless
where you happen to be or live in Canada. - Health care system is publicly administered
through tax revenues not by private business - Provinces and territories administer their own
publicly funded drug programs
5Clinical Arguments to Allow DTC Advertising of
Prescription Drugs
- Lead to better health because public becomes
educated - Under diagnosed e.g. high cholesterol
- Under treated e.g. erectile dysfunction
(impotence) - Increase discussion between patient and health
care workers about drugs and medical conditions - Better patient compliance with prescription drug
treatment regimens - New and better medications
6Economic Argument to Allow DTC Advertising of
Prescription Drugs
- Earlier management of more serious, costly
conditions that consumers typically ignore, or
chose not to treat when symptoms appear to be
minor or non-acute
7Clinical Arguments to Prohibit DTC Advertising
of Prescription Drugs
- DTC has emotional rather than educational content
- Negative effect on relationships by creating
conflicts between the patient's desire and the
caregivers more informed judgement - No discussion of non drug or non prescription
treatments - Lead to medicalisation of normal human
experiences in healthy patient populations - No evidence of improvement in choices by
physicians, patients or public health
8Economic Arguments to Prohibit DTCAdvertising
of Prescription Drugs
- Increases prescription expenditures
- Usually only advertise new drugs which are more
expensive than older drugs - No good evidence of value for money
92004 Canadian Parliamentary Inquiry Recommended
against Direct to Consumer Advertising for
Prescription Drugs
- Reason 1
- DTC advertising of prescription drugs could
contribute to increased or inappropriate drug
consumption.
10Total Expenditure on Drugs and Health OECD 2001
11Top 10 Pharmaceutical Markets in the world in
current US billion
Source IMS Midas Customized Insights (October
2001)
12Change in U.S Health Expenditures 1970 - 2002
13Drug Expenditure - International Comparisons
142004 Canadian Parliamentary Inquiry Recommended
against Direct to Consumer Advertising for
Prescription Drugs
- Reason 2
- Drug advertisements could endanger rather than
empower consumers by minimizing risk information
and exaggerating benefits
15Leading 10 US Products in Dollars Spent on
Advertising - 2002
Represents cost in millions of
advertising Source IMS Health 2002-2003
16 However - Canada is not insulated against
advertising!!!
- Spillover from American media
- Television
- Newsprint, magazines
- Canadian government has allowed two types of
indirect advertising - Reminder advertisements
- Help seeking advertisements
17Three Forms of DTC Advertising to Public
- 1. Product-disease advertising that includes both
the product name and specific therapeutic claims - 2. Reminder advertisements that provide the
name of a product without stating its use - 3. Help-seeking advertisements, which tell
consumers about a new but unspecified treatment
option.
18Reminder Advertising
- Birth control product that is now mainly
indicated for treatment of severe acne - Banned in several countries due to liver toxicity
and possibly blood clots - Why is second line second line drug in bus
shelters?
19Help Seeking Advertising
20Comparison of DTC Advertising Effect in
USA/Canada
Canadian Medical Association Journal
2003169(5)405-12
21Possible reasons that Canadians ask and spend
less often for advertised drugs
- USA public has constant advertising
- Canadian reminder and help seeking
advertising is not as effective as product -
disease advertising - Payment expenditure increases hampered by public
funding mechanisms and public/government is more
cost conscious - Canadians less inclined to see drug therapy as
another marketplace commodity
22Closing
- Currently Canadas view is that direct to
consumer advertising for prescription drugs is
not in the best interest of the patient or
society - However due to television, press and internet --
Canadian society is not isolated from US
advertising