Title: Building Social Capital for Economic Advancement
1Building Social Capital for Economic Advancement
2Overview
- Thematic Area Social Capital
- Topic Building Social Capital for
Economic Advancement - Structure of Presentation
- - Introduction- Objectives-
Motivation/Rationale- Methodology- Results- C
onclusion
3Introduction
- Social Capital
- - James Coleman 1988 developed the original
thought. (SC used by individuals to further
their own personal objectives.) - - Robert Putnam 1990s popularised the concept.
- - Economists have become increasingly interested
in SC and have formed a number of arguments as
to why higher levels of SC can lead to improved
economic performance.
4What is Social Capital
Macro
Institutions of State, rule of law
Governance
Structural
Cognitive
Trust, norms and values
Local Institutions, networks
Micro
5Definition
- Social Capital can be defined as aspects of
informal organisation, which can be used for
productive purposes and also increase the
potential for economic development in a society
by creating and sustaining social relations.
(Coleman and Turner)
6Definition
- The three main ideas of the concept of social
capital are - - SC generates positive externalities- These
externalities are achieved through shared trust,
norms, and values and their consequent effect
on expectations and behaviour - shared trust,
norms and values arise from informal forms of
organisations based on social networks and
associations.
7Critique
- No consensus on a definition . (The concept seem
to be all things to all men) - No uniform guideline for measurement instruments
making it difficult to do cross comparison
studies - The causal direction of SC difficult to determine
- SC also has a negative side
8Objectives
- The objectives of this study are to
- - Review the literature on social capital and
its economic value - - Highlight existing case studies which uses
social capital as a determinant of growth - - Determine and evaluate the economic benefits
of social capital on sporting groups in
Trinidad.
9Problem Statement
- The standard neo-classical models of growth have
had limited success in explaining growth. - - There is research on cross country growth
differences which suggest that physical and human
capital accumulation did not play a dominant role
in accounting for economic growth.
10 Table 1 Selected Growth Accounting Results for
Individual Countries
(The World Bank Economic Review, 2001, Vol. 15,
No2)
11Importance to TT
- Policy makers are greatly influenced by the
traditional neoclassical theory. - The common proxy used to measure economic growth
is GDP. - TT economy dependant on petroleum.
- Social capital can increase productivity levels
in all sectors.
12Methodology
- Assumed Social Capital exists (Putnam criteria)
- Focused on Sporting groups
- - Football, Basketball, Netball and Cricket
- Interviewed sporting administrators
- Administered questionnaires to athletes
- Results
13Table 4a Networking as an economic benefit of
Social Capital
14Table 4b Collective Action as an economic
benefit of social capital
15Table 4c Credit availability as an economic
benefit of social capital
16Conclusion
- Social Capital has economic benefits
- This economic benefit forms part of TFP
- Need for further research, especially in the
Caribbean, to capitalize on these benefits.
17THANK YOUfor your attention