What is SelfRegulation Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

What is SelfRegulation Theory

Description:

Steve Jones. Alex Wood. Alyson Dodd. Ruth Searson. Peter Taylor. Gemma Paszek. Sari Saatsi ... Sarah Amelia Jones. Karen Seal. Helen Mannion. Kim Drummond ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: SPS18
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is SelfRegulation Theory


1
What is Self-Regulation Theory Why is it
Important for CBT?
  • Dr Warren Mansell
  • University of Manchester

2
Plan
  • The History of Self-Regulation
  • Self-Regulation in Psychology
  • Why is it important for CBT?
  • Examples of self-regulation theories in
    psychology
  • The benefits of a Control Theory approach
  • Related theory research on bipolar disorder

3
Example of a Definition
  • Self-regulation refers to the exercise of
    control over oneself, especially with regard to
    bringing the self in line with preferred (thus
    regular) standards. Such processes can be found
    deep in nature.
  • Vohs Baumeister (2004)
  • The Handbook of Self-Regulation

4
Self-Regulation Deep in Nature
  • Self-regulation in plant animal physiology
    (Bernard, 1878)
  • Homeostasis of temperature, ion concentrations,
    hormone levels, etc (Cannon, 1932)
  • Examples within psychology

5
Self-Regulation in 19th Century
  • Every ascending form of organic life, moreover,
    tends more and more to realise the one
    culminating purpose to which all the lower
    spheres of organisation perpetually tend- that,
    namely, of producing an independent individual,
    containing in it the power of self-regulation,
    and capable of reacting in opposition to the
    outward impulses of nature
  • Morell (1853) Elements of Psychology
  • See William James (1890) John Dewey (1896)

6
20th Century Cybernetics
  • Research on self-regulation was greatly
    influenced by cybernetic theory, which showed how
    even inanimate mechanisms can regulate themselves
    by making adjustments according to programmed
    goals or standards.
  • Vohs Baumeister (2004)
  • The Handbook of Self-Regulation

7
Control Engineering
8
What is Cybernetics?
  • Basis in control engineering
  • Based on ancient greek cyber meaning steersman
    or governor
  • Wiener (1948) "the science of control and
    communication in the animal and the machine"
  • Utilises negative feedback

9
Self-regulationThe negative feedback loop
(e.g. Wiener, 1948 Pribram et al., 1960 Powers
et al., 1960)
REFERENCE VALUE, e.g. touching glass
Organism
COMPARATOR, e.g. 5cm
PERCEPTION, e.g. 5cm from glass
OUTPUT, e.g. move arm muscles
CONTROLLED VARIABLE e.g. proximity to glass
Environment
ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE, e.g. person moves glass
10
Why is self-regulation theory important for CBT?
  • Interpersonal control as a developmental factor
  • Loss of control as a consequence
  • Mental control as a maintenance process
  • Reduced interpersonal control during therapy,
    i.e. collaboration or client-centred
  • Control of ones life as an outcome
  • These are transdiagnostic factors (cf Harvey et
    al., 2004)

11
Interpersonal control
  • Overcontrolling parenting implicated in the
    development of psychopathology
  • e.g. Large-scale reviews by Chorpita Barlow
    (1998) Rapee (1997)
  • High Expressed Emotion relatives show greater
    control over others
  • Hooley Campbell (2002) control by family
    members predicts relapse in schizophrenia

12
Loss of control
  • Loss of control and Fear of Loss of Control
    implicated in
  • Eating disorders (Fairburn et al., 2003)
  • Bipolar Disorder (Mansell, 2006)
  • Panic Disorder (Cloitre et al., 1992)
  • Social Phobia (Cloitre et al., 1992)
  • Alcohol Substance Dependence (Bechara, 2005)
  • Depression (Learned helplessness)
  • Psychosis (e.g. thought disorder)
  • Many other disorders

13
Intrapersonal/mental control
  • Thought Suppression as a maintenance process
    (e.g. Purdon, 1999 Wegner 1994)
  • Thought Control as a maintenance process (e.g.
    Reynolds Wells, 1999)
  • Experiential Avoidance Control is the problem
    (Hayes, 2004)

14
Reduced Control in CBT
  • The relationship is collaborative, i.e. equal
    control
  • The client sets their own goals
  • Alliance predicts positive outcome (Krupnik et
    al., 2006 Horvath Bedi, 2002)
  • Further research needed

15
Control during Recovery
  • Autonomous motivation stronger predictor of
    outcome than alliance (Zuroff et al., 2007)
  • Empowerment involved in recovery
  • Sense of Purpose associated with recovery and
    well-being (Brown et al., 2008 Nygren et al.
    2005)
  • Reclaiming life (Clark Ehlers, 2000)
  • Heading towards chosen values (Hayes, 2004)
  • A higher order sense of control in contrast to
    rigidly controlling thoughts and feelings?

16
Examples of Self-Regulation Theories
  • Gross (2001) - Affect regulation
  • Situation selection situation modification
    attentional deployment cognitive change
    response modulation
  • Wells Matthews (1994)
  • Procedural beliefs manage intrusive experiences
    self-maintaining cycle
  • Treatment challenge metacognitive beliefs
    enhance attentional control
  • But how is the self-regulatory system organised?

17
Carver Scheier (1981)
  • Hierarchically organised control systems
  • Powers (1973) explicitly considered the
    possibility that control systems can be
    interconnected hierarchically and argued that
    such an organisation underlies self-regulation in
    living systems. It is on his reasoning that we
    now build.
  • The following 5 pages of Carver Scheiers
    article describe Powers (1973) theory
    Perceptual Control Theory (PCT)

18
SYSTEM CONCEPT Be a responsible
person PRINCIPLE Follow through on
commitments PROGRAM Drive over and return the
notes RELATIONSHIP Drivingness SEQUENCE Make
a turn TRANSITION Turning of steering
wheel CONFIGURATION Fingers around rim of
wheel SENSATION Gripping INTENSITY Muscle
tensions
A Control System Hierarchy
Adapted from Carver Scheier (1981, 1982) based
on Powers (1973)
INPUT
Effect on environment
19
I
A Control System Hierarchy in more detail.
20
Principles of PCT(Powers et al., 1960 Powers,
1973 2005)
  • Living organisms control their input, not their
    output
  • Behaviour is the control of perception
  • Complex, purposeful goals achieved through
    hierarchies of negative feedback loops
    automatic life is control
  • Chronic, unresolved conflict at higher levels of
    control is responsible for psychological distress
    (transdiagnostic)

21
PCT, Conflict Emotion (Powers, 1973 2006)
  • Emotions can form controlled input (perception)
    output (e.g. preparation) of control systems
  • Emotions imply conflict (i.e. a goal that is not
    immediately pursued through action)
  • Control is unhelpful when it is reactive and
    creates internal conflict arbitrary control
  • Control is helpful when it regulates lower
    systems towards higher ends (e.g. personal
    values)

22
Reorganisation
  • Conflict is reduced by reorganisation
  • Trial-and-error changes in control system
    properties (Marken Powers, 1989)
  • Occurs during learning
  • Occurs at the appropriate level e.g. tying shoe
    lace low level
  • Higher level reorganisation may be experienced
    as
  • shifting perspectives, changing appraisals,
    seeing the bigger picture, reprioritising

23
Revisiting Affect RegulationControl
Reorganisation at different levels?
Higher order goals Cognitive
change Situational selection Situational
modification Response modulation Attention
al deployment
24
Advantages of a PCT approach
  • Provides a detailed framework that allows working
    models to be constructed tested against
    real-world situations (Marken, 2009 Powers,
    2009)
  • Is not specific to mood regulation wide range
    of publications across sociology, education,
    biology, neuroscience (www.pctweb.org)
  • Leads to its own cognitive therapy Method of
    Levels (Powers, 1972 Carey, 2006)
  • transdiagnostic highly accessible

25
An Integrative Cognitive Model of Bipolar
Disorder(Mansell, Morrison, Reid, Lowens Tai,
2007)
  • Mood swings are a consequence of multiple,
    conflicted, extreme, personal appraisals of
    changes in internal state
  • Leads to internal conflict
  • trying to exert extreme control over mood in
    opposing directions
  • rather than pursuing long term goals irrespective
    of mood

26
I am excelling and overcoming all my problems
I am about to make a fool of myself, get
controlled by people and relapse
Conflict
High Energy, Agitated, High Mood
27
Modelling Mood Swings
Success!
Safety!
Failure!
Catastrophe!
INTERNAL STATE
De-activated
Highly Activated
28
Conflict Between Appraisals Task (CBAT)(Dodd,
Mansell, Tai, Morrison, in prep)
  • E-prime computer paradigm
  • 2 levels of Activation (high/low)
  • 4 domains of Internal State (cognitive,
    behavioural, physiological, affective)
  • 3 types of Appraisal (self, others, world)
  • 2 valences (positive negative)
  • Conflict Total ve x ve

29
Conflict Between Appraisals Task
  • When I feel my thoughts are racing, I think that
    I am about to have a breakdown
  • I DONT BELIEVE I BELIEVE THIS
  • THIS AT ALL COMPLETELY
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9

30
Conflict Between Appraisals TaskInteraction, p
valence on appraisals
31
A Measure of Extreme Conflicting Appraisals of
Internal State
  • HAPPI Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive
    Predictions Inventory
  • Five different categories of appraisal, e.g.
  • Self-activated When I feel really good, I
    known nothing can go wrong
  • Catastrophic When I feel agitated and
    restless, I am about to have a breakdown
  • Discriminates bipolar vs non-clinical controls
    (Mansell, 2006)

32
Mean HAPPIControlling for age, education (both
ns), and current ISS symptoms p 33
ESRC Large Grant2008-2012
Emotion Regulation of Others and the Self (EROS)
  • A Collaborative Research Network

Peter Totterdell (PI) Warren Mansell Brian
Parkinson David Holman Pasco Fearon Thomas
Webb Tom Farrow Andy Lane Paschal Shearan
Clinical Developmental Neuroscience Work
Social Health - Sports
34
EROS Manchester Site
  • Conflicting control of affect in non-clinical
    sample and in bipolar disorder (with Wood, Kelly,
    Samad, Ulph)
  • Method of Levels case series and test of
    adherence validity in primary care (with
    Lansbergen, Tai, McEvoy)

35
Summary
  • Self-regulation theory and applications have a
    long history within and outside psychology
  • Several important reasons to apply to CBT
  • A range of contemporary theories
  • Versatility utility of PCT substantial
    foundation across disciplines
  • Further research needed within CBT

36
Acknowledgements to Collaborators
  • Alyson Dodd
  • Ruth Searson
  • Peter Taylor
  • Gemma Paszek
  • Sari Saatsi
  • Sally Higginson
  • Rebecca Pedley
  • Nia Thomas
  • Sarah Amelia Jones
  • Karen Seal
  • Helen Mannion
  • Kim Drummond
  • Timothy Bird
  • Marijke Linbergen
  • Maari Faruq
  • Elizabeth Reilly
  • Lars White
  • Vaneeta Sadhnani
  • Rosie Beck
  • Alison Harvey
  • Ed Watkins
  • Roz Shafran
  • Tim Carey
  • Bill Powers
  • Tony Morrison
  • Sara Tai
  • Graeme Reid
  • Ian Lowens
  • Steve Jones
  • Alex Wood

37
Further References
  • Mansell, W., Carey, T. A. (in press). A century
    of psychology and psychotherapy. Is an
    understanding of control the missing link
    between theory, research and practice? Psychology
    and Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice.
  • Carey, T. A., Carey, M., Mullan, R. J., Spratt,
    C. G. Spratt, M. B. (in press). Assessing the
    statistical, clinical, and personal significance
    of the Method of Levels. Behavioural and
    Cognitive Psychotherapy.
  • Special Issue of the Cognitive Behaviour
    Therapist on control theory http//journals.cambr
    idge.org
  • BABCP SIG on Control Theory
  • www.pctweb.org
  • warren.mansell_at_manchester.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com