The Levels of Processing approach to memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

The Levels of Processing approach to memory

Description:

Were the P's using orienting task they were told to use during the exps? ... Shallow processing doesn't always lead at rapid forgetting depends how you are ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: ecgbertSh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Levels of Processing approach to memory


1
The Levels of Processing approach to memory
  • Craik Lockhart - concentrated on processes
    involved in memory, not structures.
  • 2 assumptions-
  • Way info is processed affects how likely it is to
    be recalled in future
  • Info can be processed at different levels range
    from shallow /superficial deep /richer levels.
  • Deeper processing ---- longer lasting memories
  • Shallow processing----- less likely to retrieve
    info

2
  • Examples of ways of processing words-
  • What does word mean? deep processing
  • Does word rhyme with another? intermediate
    processing
  • Is word in lower /upper case letters? shallow
    processing

3
Shallow end appearance
Intermediate sound
Deep end meaning
4
  • Use these questions to help you structure your
    notes on the Levels of Processing approach to
    memory. Use pages 270 272 in your text book.
  • 1. What aspect of memory did Craik Lockhart
    focus on?
  • 2. What were the two important assumptions they
    made?
  • 3. What does the LOP approach predict?
  • 4. What are the different levels at which we
    process information?
  • 5. How did Craik Tulving investigate these
    different levels? remember Aim, Method, Results
    Conclusion

5
Evaluation of Levels of Processing approach
  • encoding activity affects recall supported by
    research
  • LOP emphasises active aspects of encoding
  • Rote rehearsal (shallow processing) can improve
    recognition, (not free recall) doesnt fit LOP
    theory
  • Descriptive, not explanatory.
  • How do you measure depth of processing?
  • Info well recalled - must have been deeply
    processed.
  • How do we know info was deeply processed? It is
    recalled well. Circular argument!

6
  • Deep /semantic processing more elaborate than
    shallow processing could be that distinctive
    /unusual processing recall.
  • Were the Ps using orienting task they were told
    to use during the exps?
  • Eysenck (1986) 4 factors affect memory-
  • 1. nature of task
  • 2. type of material to be memorised
  • 3 individual knowledge of subject
  • 4. how memory performance is measured

7
  • Craik Lockhart admitted original model rather
    oversimplified have updated it.
  • Need to consider retrieval processes in more
    detail.
  • Shallow processing doesnt always lead at rapid
    forgetting depends how you are measuring
    recall!
  • Storing semantic processing no use if memory is
    to be tested by identifying words which rhymed
    with words on original list!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com