p' 148 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

p' 148

Description:

B. Lee Roberts, on behalf of the Intense Muon Physics Working Group - p. 1 /48 ... B. Lee Roberts. Department of Physics. Boston University ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: leer167
Category:
Tags: roberts

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: p' 148


1
WG4 Summary and Future Plans
  • The muon trio
  • and
  • more

B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston
University
roberts_at_bu.edu http//physics.bu.edu/robert
s.html
2
The Muon Trio
  • Lepton Flavor Violation
  • Muon MDM (g-2) chiral changing
  • Muon EDM

3
MEG
MECO
PRIME
4
Today with ee- based theory
All E821 results were obtained with a blind
analysis.
world average
5
Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments
Transformation properties
An EDM implies both P and T are violated. An EDM
at a measureable level would imply non-standard
model CP. The baryon/antibaryon asymmetry in the
universe, needs new sources of CP.
6
Present EDM Limits
projected
7
General Statements
  • We know that n oscillate
  • neutral lepton flavor violation
  • Expect Charged lepton flavor violation at some
    level
  • enhanced if there is new dynamics at the TeV
    scale
  • in particular if there is SUSY
  • We expect CP in the lepton sector (EDMs as
    well as n oscillations)
  • possible connection with cosmology (leptogenesis)

8
The Physics Case
  • Scenario 1
  • LHC finds SUSY
  • MEG sees m ? e g
  • The trio will have SUSY enhancements
  • to understand the nature of the SUSY space we
    need to get all the information possible to
    understand the nature of this new theory

9
SUSY predictions of m-A ? e-A
From Barbieri,Hall, Hisano
Rme
MECO single event sensitivity
PRIME single event sensitivity
100 200
300 100 200
300
  • ? eg m-A ? e-A Branching
  • Ratios are linearly correlated

Complementary measurements (discrimination
between SUSY models)
10
Connection with n oscillations
Additional contribution to slepton mixing from
V21, matrix element responsible for solar
neutrino deficit. (J. Hisano N. Nomura, Phys.
Rev. D59 (1999) 116005).
tan(b) 30
tan(b) 0
Largely favoured and confirmed by Kamland
After Kamland
MEG goal
All solar n experiments combined
11
SUSY connection between am , Dµ , µ ? e

12
aµ sensitivity to SUSY (large tanb)
13
SUSY, dark matter, (g-2) DE821
CMSSM
14
D E969 Dnow
15
D E969 0
16
The Physics Case
  • Scenario 2
  • LHC finds Standard Model Higgs at a reasonable
    mass, nothing else, (g-2) discrepancy could be
    the only indication beyond neutrino mass of New
    Physics
  • Then precision measurements come to the
    forefront, since they are sensitive to heavier
    virtual particles.
  • µ-e conversion is especially sensitive to other
    new physics besides SUSY

17
Sensitivity to Various me Conversion Mechanisms
Supersymmetry
Compositeness
Predictions at 10-15
Second Higgs doublet
Heavy Neutrinos
Heavy Z, Anomalous Z coupling
Leptoquarks
After W. Marciano
18
?-N ? e-N vs. m?e g as Probes of LFV
  • ?-N ? e-N is more sensitive for essentially all
    processes not mediated by photon
  • ?-N ? e-N is more sensitive than is ??e g to
    chirality conserving processes
  • ??e g is more sensitive for processes mediated by
    photons
  • B(??e ?) ? 300 ? Rme for these processes
  • The motivation is sufficiently strong that both
    experiments should be done
  • Relative rates for ??e g and ?-N ? e-N would give
    information on underlying mechanism
  • A significant rate for ??e g with polarized muons
    could give additional information on mechanism

19
The Experiments LFV
  • µe conversion and Muonium-anti-Muonium conversion
  • pulsed beam
  • µ? eg and eee
  • DC beam

20
Near Term Experiments on LFV
  • MEG _at_ PSI (under construction, data begins in
    2006)
  • 10-13 BR sensitivity
  • MECO _at_BNL (funding not certain)
  • 10-17 BR sensitivity

21
MEG _at_ PSI (10-13 BR sensitivity)
Discovery Potential 4 Events BR 2 X
10-13
22
The MECO Apparatus
Straw Tracker
Muon Stopping Target
Muon Beam Stop
Superconducting Transport Solenoid
(2.5 T 2.1 T)
Crystal Calorimeter
Superconducting Detector Solenoid (2.0 T
1.0 T)
Superconducting Production Solenoid (5.0
T 2.5 T)
Collimators
approved but not funded
10-17 BR single event sensitivity
p beam
23
Future Experiments on LFV
  • PRIME-type experiment
  • with FFAG muon storage ring
  • few X 10-19
  • Such an experiment is perfect for the front end
    of a muon factory

24
(No Transcript)
25
m e- ? m - e
Muonium production
Full M search
26
An improvement of 102 on GMM
  • would confront these types of models which
    would also contribute to double b decay. At
    the front end of a n factory with a pulsed beam
    this might be possible.

27
Future Muon (g-2) Experiments
  • E969 _at_ BNL 0.5 ? 0.20 ppm (scientific approval
    but not funded)
  • expected near-term improvement in theory, ? the
    ability to confront the SM by x 2
  • The next generation 0.20 ? 0.06 ppm
  • substantial RD would be necessary
  • new ring or improved present ring?

28
Use an E field for vertical focusing
0
spin difference frequency ws - wc
29
Muon (g-2) Store m in a storage ring
magnetic field averaged over azumuth in the
storage ring
30
E969 Systematic Error Goal
  • Field improvements will involve better trolley
    calibrations, better tracking of the field with
    time, temperature stability of room, improvements
    in the hardware
  • Precession improvements will involve new scraping
    scheme, lower thresholds, more complete
    digitization periods, better energy calibration

31
SM value dominated by hadronic issues
  • Lowest order hadronic contribution ( 60 ppm)
  • Hadronic light-by-light contribution ( 1 ppm)

The error on these two contributions will
ultimately limit the interpretation of a more
precise muon (g-2) measurement.
32
A (g-2) experiment to 0.06 ppm?
  • Makes sense if the theory can be improved to 0.1
    ppm, which is hard, but maybe not impossible.
  • With the present storage ring, we already have

33
Where we came from
34
Today with ee- based theory
All E821 results were obtained with a blind
analysis.
world average
35
Muon EDM
  • Present limit 10-19 e-cm
  • Could reach 10-24 to 10-25 at a high intensity
    muon source?

36
Spin Precession Frequencies m in B field with
both an MDM and EDM
The motional E - field, ß X B, is much stronger
than laboratory electric fields .
GV/m with no sparks!
The EDM causes the spin to precess out of plane.
37
EDM up/down Asymmetry
  • avoid the magic ? and use a radial E-field to
    turn off (g-2) precession
  • Place detectors above and below the vacuum
    chamber and look for an up/down asymmetry which
    builds up with time

38
Up/Down asymmetry vs. time
time
39
The EDM ring
  • run with both µ and µ-.
  • there must be regions of combined EB along
    with separate focusing elements.
  • There needs to be a scheme to inject CW and CCW.

Possible Muon EDM Ring Parameters
40
A possible lattice
Yuri Orlov
41
NP2
  • the figure of merit is Nµ times the
    polarization.
  • we need
  • to reach the 10-24 e-cm level.
  • Narrow pulsed beam every 100 ms

42
Additional topics
  • Muons for condensed matter (m SR)
  • Muon catalyzed fusion (m CF)
  • Muon lifetime (GF)
  • Muon capture (gp)
  • . . .

43
Depth dependent mSR measurements in near surface
regions
B(z)
Superconductor
l
z
0
  • Magnetic field profile B(z) over nm scale
  • Characteristic lengths of the sc l, x

? B(z)
44
Magnetic Field Profile in YBa2Cu3O7-d
  • Direct, absolute measurement of
  • magnetic penetration depth
  • effective mass
  • density of supercarriers
  • Direct test of theories (London, BCS)

local response ?? exponential profile
T.J. Jackson, T.M. Riseman, E.M. Forgan, H.
Glückler, T. Prokscha, E. Morenzoni, M. Pleines,
Ch. Niedermayer, G. Schatz, H. Luetkens, and
J. Litterst, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4958 (2000).
45
Beams needed
  • Pulsed intense muon beams
  • energy from surface (28 MeV/c) to 3.1 Gev/c
  • A few experiments could used DC beam, but almost
    all can use the pulse structure of a pulse, and
    some ms with no beam

46
Beam requirements A few examples
47
Plans for next year
  • LFV experiments will continue to develop the
    techniques needed for these challenging
    experiments
  • Muon EDM collaboration will continue to
    investigate the appropriate ring structure.
  • Participate in scoping study for n factory
  • At present muon physics is not mentioned in the
    document of 10 June 2005

48
Summary
  • The questions addressed are at the center of the
    field of particle physics
  • There is an important program of muon physics
    which will be possible at the front-end of a n
    factory.
  • It makes use of the very intense flux which will
    be available there
  • If such a muon facility exists, there will also
    be a program of other very interesting muon
    experiments which is possible.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com