OBJECTIVE BASED RULE MAKING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

OBJECTIVE BASED RULE MAKING

Description:

Is the process applied by States for establishing, overseeing and enforcing ... are meaningful regulatory statements which can be comprehended by the Regulatee; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: sruan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OBJECTIVE BASED RULE MAKING


1
  • OBJECTIVE BASED RULE MAKING
  • Tony LICU
  • Safety Regulation Unit
  • EUROCONTROL
  • INTERFACE - EATMP Programmes SRC
  • WORKSHOP
  • July 2002

2
Summary
  • Safety Regulation
  • Roles of regulator and Regulatee
  • Prescriptive vs. Objective-based Regulation
  • Flexibility offered to the Service Provider
  • Impact on EATMP Programmes and ANSPs

3
Safety Regulation
Is the process applied by States for
establishing, overseeing and enforcing minimum
safety levels in the public interest. It includes
  • Rule making, usually in the form of safety
    regulatory requirements
  • Means for ensuring compliance of those subject
    to safety regulation within national legal
    frameworks

4
ROLES OF THE REGULATED ORGANISATION
  • To verify externally-provided goods and services
  • To have effective monitoring systems
  • To detect changes which could affect safety,
    including deviations from standards
  • To have an organisational safety policy
  • To ensure staff safety-awareness
  • To ensure adequate training and competence
  • To respond to changes in requirements

5
ROLES OF THE REGULATOR
  • For national ATM
  • To agree key safety standards and principles
  • To ensure national standards meet international
  • To resist unacceptable shortcuts to safety
  • To ensure service providers have appropriate
    safety measures in place (including SMS)
  • To monitor overall ATM safety performance
  • To issue safety recommendations remedial actions

6
Spectrum of Regulation
Do Nothing
Audit Regime
Resident Inspector
Respond to Problems
Frequent Inspection/ Reporting
Regulator does The Job
SMS
Approved Organisation/Operations
7
Prescriptive vs. Objective based Regulations
  • In prescriptive regulations the specific means of
    achieving compliance is mandated

You shall install a 1m high rail, 1 meter from
the edge of the cliff
8
Shortcomings for Prescriptive Regulations
  • ?The Regulatee is required to carry out the
    mandated actions to discharge his legal
    responsibilities to the regulator
  • ?Prescriptive regulations encode the best
    practices at the time that they were written and
    become deficient as best practices change e.g.
    with evolving technologies
  • ?Prescriptive safety regulations are unable to
    cope with a diversity of design solutions.

9
Objective-based Regulations
  • Objective-based regulation defines a goal to be
    achieved without mandating the means of
    compliance
  • As such the Regulatee has the freedom to adopt
    the most suitable means of compliance

People shall be prevented from falling over the
edge of the cliff
  • Objective-based regulation can be refined in a
    hierarchical manner, to provide many levels of
    sub-goals
  • Objective-based regulation should reduce
    unnecessarily restrictive regulations which may
    be viewed as a barrier to open markets
  • Objective-based regulation should not adversely
    affect the cost and technical quality of
    available solutions.

10
An approach to Objective-based regulations (1)
  • The Regulator is required to set objective goals
    which do not remove the Regulatees freedom of
    solution by prescribing the AMCs
  • It is the responsibility of the Regulatee to
    present a claim that the safety goal has been
    achieved and convince the regulator that it is
    true
  • It is not the responsibility of the regulator to
    construct the claim on behalf of the Regulatee.

11
An approach to Objective-based regulations (2)
  • Goals/Objectives shall be decomposed into
    sub-goals until are meaningful regulatory
    statements which can be comprehended by the
    Regulatee
  • Unambiguous, concise, complete and measurable
    criteria must be agreed, to define areas where
    argument and evidence is required to support a
    claim that a goal is achieved
  • The rigour of the argument and supporting
    evidence should correspond to the risk of a claim
    not being substantiated

12
Impact on ANSPs and EATMP Programmes
  • Need to demonstrate (ANSPs) that changes to ATM
    system are safe
  • Need to demonstrate compliance with ESARRs
  • State HOW the compliance is intended to be
    demonstrated
  • Demonstrate through the Safety Documentation
    (Safety case)

13
Safety Policy Safety Plan
Safety Deliverables
14
Conclusion on Impact on ANSP and EATMP
Programme Safety Policy Describes the
Programme safety assessment strategy
Programme Safety Plan Outlines the
safety assessment activities, milestones,
timescale etc.
Programme Safety Deliverables Details safety
assessment, verification validation activities,
15
Summary
  • Safety Regulation
  • Roles of regulator and Regulatee
  • Prescriptive vs. Goal-based Regulation
  • Flexibility offered to the Service Provider
  • Impact on EATMP Programmes and ANSPs

16
  • OBJECTIVE BASED RULE MAKING
  • Tony LICU
  • Safety Regulation Unit
  • EUROCONTROL
  • INTERFACE - EATMP Programmes SRC
  • WORKSHOP
  • July 2002

END OF PRESENTATION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com