Addressing the Psychological Needs of Adolescent Cancer Survivors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Addressing the Psychological Needs of Adolescent Cancer Survivors

Description:

'long-term sequelae of childhood cancer and its treatment' Langeveld et al, 2004 ... Quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:245
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: grae8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Addressing the Psychological Needs of Adolescent Cancer Survivors


1
Addressing the Psychological Needs of Adolescent
Cancer Survivors
  • Lynley Wicks
  • Consultant Clinical Psychologist
  • Paediatric Oncology Team
  • Capital Coast Health
  • lynley.wicks_at_ccdhb.org.nz

2
Overview
  • Importance of Late Effects
  • Academic outcomes
  • Psychosocial outcomes
  • Addressing the psychological needs

3
Importance of Late Effects
  • Some Statistics
  • Survival from childhood cancer has improved
    dramatically
  • lt30 in 1960
  • gt80 in 2000
  • 1 in 900 adults are survivors of childhood cancer

4
Importance of Late Effects
  • Improvement in survival is due to
  • Increased intensity of treatment
  • Survival is most important
  • If the survival rate can be maintained then
    treatment protocols will investigate treatment
    effects

5
Importance of Late Effects
  • Now with increasing survival rates we can begin
    to examine treatment effects
  • Improvement in survival comes at the cost of
    increased long-term toxicity
  • Physical
  • Cognitive
  • Psycho-social

6
Importance of Late Effects
  • Late Effects
  • long-term sequelae of childhood cancer and its
    treatment Langeveld et al, 2004
  • Frequency of Late Effects
  • Reports from studies vary
  • 58 to 69 at least one late effect
  • 32 to 49 two or more late effects

7
Academic Outcomes
  • Survivors more likely to have declined in
    intellectual / cognitive functioning
  • Outcomes are highly variable
  • Skills most likely to be effected
  • Attention
  • Working memory
  • Planning organising
  • Processing speed

8
Academic Outcomes
  • Usually have a positive learning slope

9
Academic Outcomes
  • Increased intellectual declines associated with
  • Being younger at age of treatment
  • Being female
  • Type of treatment
  • Cranial irradiation
  • Type of drug
  • More aggressive treatment

10
Academic Outcomes
  • Biological factors
  • Tumour size, location
  • Brain abnormalities found on MRI
  • Other physical effects
  • seizures
  • hearing

11
Academic Outcomes
  • Time since treatment

12
Academic Outcomes
  • Non-biological factors
  • Missed school days
  • Loss of social and environmental stimulation
  • Loss of motivation
  • Reduced focus on developing academic skills

13
Academic Outcomes
  • Survivors
  • more likely to repeat school grade
  • Inconsistent data re
  • number of examinations passed
  • finishing school
  • attending tertiary education

14
Academic Outcomes
  • How can we address these psychological needs?
  • Reduce the neuropsychological toxicity of
    treatment
  • Increase surveillance of cognitive status
  • Teach skills to compensate for cognitive losses
  • Educate of caregivers, teachers and survivors
  • Have realistic expectations
  • Celebrate the skills the child has!!

15
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Fewer studies evaluating
  • behavioural / emotional / social differences

16
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Most use measures of Quality of Life (QoL)
  • QoL many different meanings
  • Freedom from physical symptoms
  • Being happy
  • Meaningful relationships
  • the state of complete physical, mental
  • and social well-being (WHO)

17
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Studies have examined
  • Self-esteem
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Social skills
  • Body Image
  • Loneliness
  • Mood
  • Personality
  • Coping
  • Social desirability
  • Intrusiveness
  • Physical symptoms
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

18
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • In many studies no major differences
  • Langeveld et al, 2004
  • No difference in self esteem scores
  • Fewer concerns re. general health, self image
    dying
  • More concerns re. fertility, insurance,
    employment
  • Lower physical functioning
  • Higher vitality
  • Less bodily pain

19
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Emotional outcomes
  • No increase in emotional difficulties
  • (including depression and anxiety)
  • Not at greater risk for psychiatric
    hospitalisation
  • (except survivors of brain tumour increased risk
    of psychoses)
  • Biological rather psychosocial vulnerability
  • ? More likely to have symptoms of Post Traumatic
    Stress Disorder
  • (inconsistent - related to family functioning and
    support?)

20
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Body Image
  • More likely to report Body Image disturbance
  • Side effects more critical for children than
    adults e.g. infertility, limited growth
  • Where the survivor has no obvious physical
    problem Body Image not compromised

21
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Social outcomes
  • ALL improves social skills!
  • Less likely to be heavy drinkers
  • Participated in fewer activities
  • More likely to pass driving test than siblings

22
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Marriage and parenting
  • Lower marriage higher divorce rates
  • Inconsistent
  • More likely to worry about the health of the
    children

23
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Employment
  • Generally no difference
  • Increased work discrimination?
  • Females less likely to be employed

24
Psychosocial Outcomes
  • Variations in QoL
  • Physical late effects
  • Practical implication of late effects
  • Compromised social life / independence
  • Gender
  • Unemployment
  • Age at follow up
  • Years since completion of therapy

25
Addressing the Psychological Needs
  • Regular long-term follow up
  • Multi-Disciplinary teams
  • Psychologists / Social Workers attached to
    Pediatric Oncology teams
  • Joint Late Effects clinics
  • Education
  • Parents
  • Adolescent/young adult
  • Others involved in survivors care

26
Late Affects Assessment Programme
  • LEAP (began June 2006)
  • All survivors to be seen by a clinical
    psychologist and paediatric oncologist 2 years
    after completion of treatment up to 20 years
    approx
  • All survivors reviewed at least every two years
  • Neuropsychological assessment if receive cranial
    radiation or academic problems reported
  • Referred on to other services as required
  • Clinics in Starship, Wellington Christchurch

27
  • Ultimately, cure is about controlling the
    disease, but is also about preserving dreams and
    maximising potential.
  • Eiser, 2004
  • Thanks to

28
References
  • Langeveld, N. E., et al. (2004). Quality of life,
    self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors
    of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncology 13 867-881
  • Mulhern, R. K., Butler, R. W. (2004).
    Neurocognitive sequelae of childhood cancers and
    their treatment. Pediatric Rehabilitation 7
    1-14.
  • Oeffinger, K. C., Hudson, M. M. (2004).
    Long-term complications following childhood and
    adolescent cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 54 208
    236
  • Wallace, W. B. H., Green, D. M. (2004). Late
    effects of childhood cancer. Arnold London.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com