Title: Pretreatment Headworks Analysis
1 2007 HEADWORKS ANALYSIS WORKSHOP
2Todays Presentation
- Objectives of Pretreatment Program
- Purpose of Headworks Analysis
- Introduce TYPICALVILLE
- Discuss the Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan
(L/STMP) - Develop Removal Rates from L/STMP data
- Determine Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading
(MAHL)
3Todays Presentation (cont,)
- Evaluate Uncontrollable Load to the POTW
- Determine Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading
(MAIL) - Allocation Table (AT)
- Headworks Addendum for Sludge Loading(HASL)
4TYPICALVILLE
NPDES Permit Limits
WWTP
Aeration Basin Clarifier Disinfection Digester
Water Quality Standards
Land Application Standards
5Objectives of the Pretreatment Program- 40 CFR
403.2
- 1) Protect the Waters of the State (the stream)
- 2) Protect the POTWs Microorganisms WWTP
- 3) Protect the Land/ Groundwater (Sludge)
- 4) Protect Worker Health and Safety
6Headworks Analysis What is it Good for?
- Tool to help POTW meet the objectives of 40 CFR
403.2 - Summarizes Operating Conditions at the POTW
- Summarizes Ability of POTW to remove Pollutants
of Concern (POCs) - Calculates
- Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL)
- Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL)
7Three Limiting HWA Criteria or Basis for MAHL
- 1) Pass Through Criteria-
- a) NPDES
- b) NC-Water Quality Standards
- 2) Biological Processes Inhibition-
- a) Activated Sludge Inhibition
- b) Nitrification Inhibition
- c) Anaerobic Digester Inhibition
- 3) Sludge Criteria- 503 Regulations
- a) Ceiling concentration
- b) Cumulative loading
8HWA -Limiting CriteriaPass Through
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
1a
River Styx
9Pass Through for Lead- based on NPDES Permit Limit
Commercial
SIUs
NPDES Permit
NPDES Permit Limit 0.05mg/l
WWTP
10 MGD 75 RR
Limits
0.2 mg/l (16.7 s/day) Influent
Water Quality Standards
Residential
Land Application Standards
10Three Limiting HWA Criteria or Basis for MAHL
- 1) Pass Through Criteria-
- a) NPDES
- b) NC-Water Quality Standards
- 2) Biological Processes Inhibition-
- a) Activated Sludge Inhibition
- b) Nitrification Inhibition
- c) Anaerobic Digester Inhibition
- 3) Sludge Criteria- 503 Regulations
- a) Ceiling concentration
- b) Cumulative loading
11HWA -Limiting CriteriaBiological Process
Inhibition
2a and 2b
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
2c
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
River Styx
12Inhibition Loading for Lead- based on Activated
Sludge Inhibition
Commercial
SIUs
WWTP
10 MGD Activated Sludge
0.5 mg/l (41.7 s/ day) Influent
Water Quality Standards
Land Application Standards
13Three Limiting HWA Criteria or Basis for MAHL
- 1) Pass Through Criteria-
- a) NPDES
- b) NC-Water Quality Standards
- 2) Biological Processes Inhibition-
- a) Activated Sludge Inhibition
- b) Nitrification Inhibition
- c) Anaerobic Digester Inhibition
- 3) Sludge Criteria- 503 Regulations
- a) Ceiling concentration
- b) Cumulative loading
14HWA -Limiting CriteriaSludge 503 Regulations
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
3a 3b
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
River Styx
15Sludge Loading for Lead- based on Cumulative
Sludge Loading
Commercial
SIUs
WWTP
10MGD
75 RR
0.125 mg/l (10.4 s/ day) Influent
- Given
- 267 lbs/acre std. from permit
- 122 acres permitted
- 3.5 solids
- 0.001 MGD flow to disposal
Water Quality Standards
Land Application Standards
16Compare Allowable Loads
- Pass Through Loading
- NPDES 16.7 s/day
- Inhibition Loading
- Activated sludge inhibition 41.7 s/day
- Sludge Loading
- Cumulative sludge loading 10.4 s/day
- Use the most limiting criteria to protect the
plant!
17What does this number mean?
- All things being equal
- The POTW can safely treat 10.4 s/day of Lead
- Greater than 10.4 s/day may cause violation of
the cumulative sludge loading criteria. - The POTW has 10.4 s/day of lead allocation to
distribute to its users.
18Example Allocation
19Three Limiting HWA Criteria or Basis for MAHL
- 1) Pass Through Criteria-
- a) NPDES
- b) NC-Water Quality Standards
- 2) Biological Processes Inhibition-
- a) Activated Sludge Inhibition
- b) Nitrification Inhibition
- c) Anaerobic Digester Inhibition
- 3) Sludge Criteria- 503 Regulations
- a) Ceiling concentration
- b) Cumulative loading
20HWA -Limiting Criteria
2a and 2b
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
2c
3a 3b
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
1a
River Styx
21Preparing Your HWA
- Where do I begin?
- How long will it take to prepare a HWA?
- Where can I find the answers to common questions?
22Preparing Your HWA
- Where do I begin?
- Long or Short Term Monitoring sampling.
- How long will it take to prepare a HWA? Anywhere
from 2 weeks to 2 months. - Where can I find the answers to common questions?
- Comprehensive Guide or contact the PERCS Unit.
23 - The Key To A Headworks Analysis
24Longterm Monitoring Plan
- Division approved LTMP has
- proper sampling locations
- proper pollutants of concern
- proper detection levels
- Typically, your LTMP will say to monitor monthly
for 12 months to provide adequate sampling data
for the HWA - Or use at least three years of quarterly sampling
25Longterm Monitoring Plan
- Use your DMR data plus your LTMP data
- Flow
- BOD
- TSS
- NH3
- Other parameters you may sample more often for
your NPDES permit metals, cyanide
26Short-term Monitoring Plan Modified Programs
- Frequency
- Four sets of quarterly samples
- Use your DMR data plus your STMP data
27 - for Pollutants of Concern in your Publicly Owned
Treatment Works
28Town of Oz WWTP
Gold Brick Metal Finishing
Flying Monkey Kitchen
NPDES Permit Limits
WWTP
Aeration Basin Clarifier Disinfection Digester
Water Quality Standards
Land Application Standards
29OZ- WWTP
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
Sludge
Chlorine Disinfect
River Styx
30What Do I Need To Calculate POTW Removal Rates?
- Long/Short Term Monitoring Data
- DMR Data for BOD and TSS, etc.
- Removal Rate Equations
- Default Removal Rates/Literature RRs
- Literature RRs found in Appendix 5-D
31Calculating Removal Rates
- POTW Removal Rate Calculation
- RR (CI- CE)/ CI 100
- RR Removal Rate Percentage
- CI Concentration Influent, mg/L
- CE Concentration Effluent, mg/L
32Removal Rate - Spreadsheet
33Removal Rate - Answers
34Removal Rates- Spread Sheet Continued for Cadmium
35Cadmium - RR Continued Use 1/2 Detection
36When Do I Use Literature RRs?
- When more than 50 of the data collected is below
the detection level - When you have a small data set or a
misrepresentative data set - Any Questions? Call the Pretreatment Unit or
Consult The Comprehensive Guidance for
Pretreatment Programs in North Carolina, Chapter
5, Section 5-D, page 1
37Cadmium - RR Continued Answers
38Calculate Removal Rates For Each POC
- Average influent/effluent for all POCs, mg/L
- All summarized data must be sent to DENR-
- not lab sheets
- Calculate the Removal Rate for all POCs
- Document the basis for your Removal Rate
39Removal Rates Summary Page
Review DWQ Removal Rates Spreadsheet!!
40 41Calculate Pass Through Using EitherNPDES Permit
Limit or NC Water Quality Standards
PROTECTING THE STREAM
42HWA -Limiting CriteriaPass Through
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
1a
River Styx
43What Do I Need To Calculate Pass Through?
- Current NPDES Permit
- Which parameters are limited?
- New NPDES limits expected/drafted?
- NC Water Quality Standards Table
- All parameters not limited in your NPDES
- Pass Through Equations
- Removal Rates
- Average POTW Flow (NOT Permitted flow)
44Calculating Pass Through
- NPDES Limit Calculation
- LNPDES(8.34)(CNPDES)(QPOTW)
- (1-RRPOTW)
- LNPDES Allowable Headworks Loading based on
NPDES - Limit in lbs/day
- CNPDES NPDES Permit Limit, mg/L
- QPOTW Average POTW Effluent Flow, MGD
- RRPOTW Removal Rate Across the POTW, as a decimal
45Calculating Pass Through For BOD
- NPDES Limit Calculation
- LNPDES_BOD( 8.34 )( )(
) ________ - ( 1-
) - CNPDES_BOD NPDES Permit Limit, mg/L1
- QPOTW Average POTW Flow, MGD2
- RRPOTW_BOD Removal Rate Across the POTW,
decimal3 - 1) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - NPDES Permit
- 2) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - General Info
- 3) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Removal Rate Summary
lbs./day
46Pass Through for BOD
- NPDES Limit Calculation
- LNPDES (8.34)(CNPDES_BOD)(QPOTW)
- (1-RRPOTW_BOD)
- CNPDES_BOD 30 mg/L
- QPOTW 2.206 MGD
- RRPOTW_BOD 0.954
47Pass Through- BOD Answer
- LNPDES (8.34)(30)(2.206)
- (1- 0.954)
- 11,999 lbs./day BOD
- allowed to meet the NDPES Permit Limit of 30 mg/L
48What If I Calculate A Different Removal Rate?
- For Example
- What if your POTW
- removal rate 98?
- What if your POTW
- removal rate 94?
- How much difference does it make?
49 If Your RR were 98?
- LNPDES_BOD_98 (8.34)(30)(2.206)
- (1-0.98)
- (using 98Removal Rate)
- 27,597 lbs./day
50 If Your RR were 94?
- LNPDES_BOD_94 (8.34)(30)(2.206)
- (1-0.94)
- (using 94Removal Rate)
- 9,199 lbs./day
51 52What about the Concentrations?
Lbs/day / (MGD 8.34) mg/l
53What about the Concentrations?
Lbs/day / (MGD 8.34) mg/l
54What about Design?
- The engineers who designed your WWTP designed it
to be able to treat a specific target or design
influent value for selected parameters and still
meet your NPDES limit. - LDesign
- (8.34)(Design Influent, mg/l)(Design flow, MGD)
- Use average Design values, not max or peak
55Where are my Design values?
- OM Manual
- Plans and Specs
- Engineers Calculations
- What about
- Upgrades
- Expansions
- New design parameters
56BOD Design MAHL
- Town of Oz Design BOD _______ mg/l1
- Town of Oz Design Flow _______ MGD1
- (8.34) ( _____ mg/l) ( ______ MGD)
- ________ lbs/day
- Tab 2- References and Answers OM Manual
57BOD Design MAHL
- Town of Oz Design BOD 200 mg/l
- Town of Oz Design Flow 5.0 MGD
- (8.34) (200 mg/l) (5 MGD)
- 8,340 lbs/day
58What about the Concentrations?
When does the influent concentration become too
high?
59287 mg/l or 200 mg/l ?Whats the Big Deal?
- All NC POTWs must evaluate the Design Load for
any applicable parameters and compare to the
Pass-through Load, in both mg/l and lbs./day - Pass-through less than Design, use Pass-through
as MAHL - May be able to use Design if underloaded.
Contact PERCS to discuss. - Design less than Pass-through,use Design as MAHL
- Remember thats all MAHL you will ever have.
- Not happy?
Show HWA Spreadsheet!
60287 mg/l or 200 mg/l ?Whats the Big Deal?
- Sometimes a WWTF can actually treat wastewater
better than the design criteria set by the
engineer. - An MAHL Design Criteria may be approved with
- Design Multiplier
- Historic Data Design Load?
- NC Professional Engineer provides new Stamped
Design Calculations - Other Compelling Argument?
- More specific guidance on web-site soon!
Show HWA Spreadsheet!
61Calculating WQ Pass Through
- NC Water Quality Standard Calculation
- LWQS(8.34)(CWQS)(QPOTW QSTR)
- (1-RRPOTW)
- LWQS Allowable Headworks Loading based on
WQS,lbs/day - CWQS Water Quality Standard, mg/L
- QPOTW Average POTW Flow, MGD
- QSTR Receiving Stream 7Q10 Flow, MGD
- RRPOTW Removal Rate Across the POTW, as a
decimal - except phenols in WS streams-use 30Q2 Flow,
MGD- Call DWQ for assistance - Human Health Carcinogens use Average
Flow, MGD - Call DWQ for assistance
62Calculating WQ Pass Through For Cadmium
- NC Water Quality Standard Calculation
- LWQS_Cd (8.34)( )(
) ________ - ( 1-
) - CWQS_Cd Water Quality Standard, mg/L1
- QPOTW Average POTW Effluent Flow, MGD2
- QSTR Receiving Stream 7Q10 Flow, MGD3
- RRPOTW_Cd Removal Rate Across the POTW, as a
decimal4 - 1) Blue Sheet - COMP GUIDE 94 - Water Quality
Standards Appendix 5-E - 23) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS -General Info
- 4) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Removal Rate Summary
lbs./day
63WQ Pass Through For Cadmium
- NC Water Quality Standard Calculation
- LWQS(8.34)(CWQS)(QPOTW QSTR_7Q10)
- (1-RRPOTW)
- CWQS 0.002 mg/L (Aquatic Life Standard- Class
C) - QPOTW_AVG 2.206 MGD
- QSTR_7Q10 58.17 MGD (to covert CFS to MGD, by
1.55) - RRPOTW 0.67
64WQ Pass Through Cd- Answer
- LWQS_Cd (8.34)(0.002)(58.172.206)
- (1- 0.67)
- 3.0517 lbs./ day Cadmium
- allowed to meet the NC WQS
- of 0.002 mg/L, Aquatic Life Class-C
65What If Your 7Q10 Flow Equaled Zero?
- LWQS_Cd(8.34)(0.002)(02.206)
- (0.33)
- 0.1115 lbs./ day
- of Cadmium to Meet NC WQS if your 7Q10 were Zero
66Action Levels
- Action Level Parameters in NC are
- Cu, Fe, Ag, Zn, and Chlorides
-
- Do not calculate Water Quality Standard Pass
- Through for Action Level Parameters, UNLESS
- The POTW is failing Toxicity and an Action Level
Pollutant is the cause for failing.
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!!
67 68Calculate Biological Inhibition By
Evaluating Activated Sludge Inhibition
Nitrification Inhibition Anaerobic Digester
Inhibition
PROTECTING THE POTW's MICROORGANISMS
69HWA -Limiting CriteriaBiological Process
Inhibition
2a and 2b
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
2c
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
River Styx
70What Do I Need To Calculate Biological
Inhibition?
- A Basic understanding of the microorganisms
active at your WWTP - Wastewater Biological Treatment Units-
- Activated Sludge, Aeration Basin, etc.
- Trickling Filter
- Carbonaceous Vs. Nitrogenous/Nitrification
- Sludge Biological Treatment Units-
- Anaerobic Digester
- Inhibition Formulas
- LTMP/STMP data from basins and Digesters
- Note No literature Biological Inhibition
Criteria for BOD, TSS, Mo, Se, Phenol, or several
other parameters
71Activated Sludge/ Nitrification Inhibition
- L2INH (8.34)(C2INH)(QPOTW)
- (1-RR1)
- L2INH Secondary Inhibition, lbs./day
- C2INH 2 Inhibition Criteria, mg/L
- QPOTW_AVGAverage POTW Flow, MGD
- RR1 Primary Removal Rate, as
- a decimal
Aeration Basin
No primary clarifiers? No problem! Divide by 1
72Activated Sludge/ Nitrification Inhibition for
Cadmium
- L2INH_Cr (8.34)( )( )
_____ - ( )
- C2INH_Cd 2 Inhibition Criteria, mg/L1
- QPOTW_AVGAverage POTW Flow, MGD2
- RR1_Cd Primary Removal Rate, as a decimal3
- 1) Pink Sheet - COMP GUIDE 94 TAB - Appendix 5-D,
table 3.2 and 3.4 - 2 3) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - General Info
- note OZ WWTP does not have primary clarifiers
lbs./day
73Activated Sludge/ Nitrification Inhibition for
Cadmium
- L2INH_Cd (8.34)(C2INH_Cd)(QPOTW)
- (1-RR1_Cd)
- C2INH_Cd 1.0 mg/L Activated Sludge
- C2INH_Cd 5.2 mg/L Nitrification
- QPOTW 2.206 MGD
- 1-RR1_Cd 1
- RR1_Cd 0 , because OZ doesnt have Primary
Clarifiers
Which Inhibition value do I use?
74Which Inhibition Value Do I Use? Activated Sludge
or Nitrification
- Activated Sludge Inhibition
- All POTWs must evaluate for Activated Sludge
Inhibition - Nitrification Inhibition
- Only POTWs who have
- an Ammonia limit
- and/or
- Nitrogenous Bacteria
75Which Inhibition Value Do I Use, Activated Sludge
or Nitrification?
- Look at the OZ NPDES Permit1
- Do they have a limit?
- Look at the LTMP Data2
- Does the data suggest the WWTP Nitrifies?
- Ask the ORC
- Does your POTW Nitrify?
- 1) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - NPDES Permit
- 2) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Removal Rates Summary
Page
76Activated Sludge/ Nitrification Inhibition for
Cadmium
- L2INH_Cd (8.34)( )( )
_____ - ( 1- )
- C2INH_Cd 2 Inhibition Criteria, mg/L1
- QPOTW_AVGAverage POTW Flow, MGD2
- RR1_Cd Primary Removal Rate, as a decimal3
- 1) Pink Sheet - COMP GUIDE 94 TAB - Appendix 5-D
table 3.2 and 3.4 - 2 3) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - General Info
- note OZ WWTP does not have primary clarifiers
lbs./day
77Activated Sludge/ Nitrification Inhibition for
Cadmium- Answer
- L2INH_Cd (8.34)(1.0)(2.206)
- (1-0)
- Use the most limiting Criteria- in this case use
Activated Sludge Inhibition Criteria at 1.0 mg/L - 18.3980 lbs./day
- of Cd to Meet Literature Wastewater
- Inhibition Criteria for Activated Sludge
Inhibition
78Site Specific Inhibition Criteria
- What if Site Specific cadmium values are
- greater than Literature Values?
- For Example What if ...
- LTMP Aeration Basin Sampling 1.25 mg/L
- Can the POTW use this number for Biological
- Inhibition Criteria instead of 1.0 mg/L found in
the - Literature Inhibition Criteria for Activated
Sludge ?
79Site Specific Inhibition Criteria
- The LTMP data suggests that the WWTP is
acclimated to higher levels of Cadmium than
traditional literature values Questions for the
ORC - Does the 1.25 mg/l of Cd upset the plant?
- Were there NPDES or Toxicity violations?
- Were any effluent parameters (usually BOD, TSS
NH3) elevated above normal for no other apparent
reason? - Was there Foaming?
- Was there fluctuations in the DO?
- Did the Bugs Die?
- If No, then the POTW may reevaluate the
Biological Activated Sludge Criteria using
1.25mg/L - (this gives the POTW 22.9976 lbs./day of Cd for
meeting the Site Specific Biological Inhibition
Criteria)
80Anaerobic Digester Inhibition
- LSLINH (8.34)(CSLINH)(QDIG)
- (RR)
- LSLINH Sludge Inhibition, lbs./day
- CSLINH Anaerobic Digester Inhibition Criteria,
mg/L - QDIGAverage POTW Flow to Digester, MGD
- RR Removal Rate across the POTW, as a decimal
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!!
Note Town of OZ WWTP- Doesnt Have an Anaerobic
Digester
81 - Land Application Residuals
82Calculate Sludge Criteria-503 Regulations By
EvaluatingCeiling ConcentrationCumulative
Loading
PROTECTING THE LAND AND GROUND WATER
83HWA -Limiting CriteriaSludge 503 Regulations
Bar Screen
Clarifier
Aeration Basin
Aeration Basin
Grit Removal
Filter
3a 3b
Digester
Sludge
Chlorine/ UV Disinfect
River Styx
84Sludge Criteria
- What do I need to determine the sludge Criteria?
- Copy of your current Sludge Permit
- Copy of your current Annual Sludge Report
- Sludge Formulas
85Ceiling Concentration
- LSLCEIL(8.34)(CCEIL)( Solids/100)(QDISP)
- (RRPOTW)
- LSLCEIL Ceiling Concentration
- Allowable Headworks, lbs./ day
- CCEIL Sludge Ceiling Standard/Limit, mg/kg
- Solids Percent Solids to Disposal
- QDISP Sludge Flow to Disposal, MGD
- RRPOTW POTW RR, as a decimal
86Ceiling Concentration For Cadmium
- LSLCEIL_Cd(8.34)( )( /100)(
) ______ - ( )
- CCEIL_Cd Sludge Ceiling Standard/Limit, mg/kg1
- Solids Percent Solids to Disposal2
- QDISP Sludge Flow to Disposal, MGD3
- RRPOTW_Cd POTW RR, as a decimal4
- 1) TAB 2 REF. ANSWERS -Sludge Permit Limits Page
- 2 3) TAB 2 REF. ANSWERS - General Info
- 4) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Removal Rates Summary
lbs./day
87Ceiling Concentration for Cadmium
- LSLCEIl_Cd(8.34)(CCEIl_Cd)( Solids/100)(QDISP)
- (RRPOTW_Cd)
- CCEIL_Cd 85 mg/kg
- Solids 3.59 Solids
- QDISP 0.005MGD
- RRPOTW_Cd 0.67
88Ceiling Concentration for Cadmium- Answer
- LSLCEIL_Cd(8.34)(85)( 3.59/100)(0.005)
- (0.67)
- 0.1899 lbs./day Cadmium
- allowed in order to meet the Ceiling
- Concentration Standard/Limit for Land Application
89Cumulative Loading
- LSLCUM (CAR)(SA)
- (SL)(RRPOTW)(365 days/year)
- LSLCUM Cumulative Application, lbs./day
- CAR Cumulative Application Limit, lbs./acre
- SA Site Area, in acres
- SL Site Life
- RRPOTWRemoval Rate, as a decimal
90Cumulative Loading For Cadmium
- LSLCUM_Cd ( )(
) ___________ - ( )( ) (365
days/year) - CAR_Cd Cumulative Application Limit, lbs./acre1
- SA Site Area, in acres2
- SL Site Life3
- RRPOTW_CdRemoval Rate, as a decimal4
- 1) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Sludge Permit Limits
Page - 2) TAB 3 - REF. ANSWERS - Sludge Permit Cover
Page - 3 4) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - General
Info,-Removal Rate Summary
lbs./day
91Cumulative Loading for Cadmium
- LSLCUM_Cd (CAR_Cd)(SA)
- (SL)(RRPOTW_Cd)(365 days/year)
- CAR_Cd 34 lbs./acre
- SA 122, in acres
- SL 400 years
- RRPOTW_Cd 0.67
92Cumulative Loading for Cadmium Answer
- LSLCUM_Cd (34)(122)
- (400)(0.67)(365)
- 0.0424 lbs./day Cadmium
- allowed in order to meet the Cumulative Sludge
- Limit for Land Application
93Compare Sludge Values for Cd
- Ceiling Loading
- 0.1899 lbs./day
- Use 0.0424 lbs./day in the MAHL comparison
because Cumulative Loading is more limiting
- Cumulative Loading
- 0.0424 lbs./day
Vs
Vs
94Sludge Loading Comparison
BOD TSS, Ammonia, and Cyanide do not have
established sludge criteria.
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!!
95Notice To Composters!
The previous example was for land applied
sludge. If you compost your sludge or create a
high quality sludge for distribution to the
public you must replace the ceiling limits with
the more stringent monthly average concentration
limits (40 CFR 503.13). Please note the
Molybdenum ceiling concentration will still apply
as it is the most restrictive criteria.
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!!
96 - Determines the Amount of Pollutant the POTW can
Treat Based on the Most Restrictive Criteria
97MAHL Comparison Of The Three Criteria- Choose
Most Limiting
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!
98 - Determines the Amount of Uncontrollable Flow and
Pollutants to the POTW
99What Is Uncontrollable Load?
- Everything that contributes to the POTW not
covered in an SIU Permit - Residential
- Non-Residential, but not SIU
- Some Examples
- Commercial
- Hospitals, Funeral Homes
- Doctors, Dentists
- Car Repair/Wash Centers
- Inflow/Infiltration
- ALL Non-SIUs
100Uncontrollable Flow Determination
- Uncontrollable Flow Calculation
- Q UNC_Flow (Q POTW_Flow-S QSIU_Flow)
- QUNC_Flow Uncontrollable Flow
- QPOTW_Flow Average POTW Flow
- S QSIU_Flow Sum of the Average SIU Flow
101Uncontrollable Flow Determination
- Uncontrollable Flow Calculation
- Q UNC_Flow ( - S
) _________ - Q POTW_Flow Average POTW Flow1
- QSIU_Flow1 Average SIU 1 Flow2
- QSIU_Flow2 Average SIU 2 Flow3
- 1) Tab 2 - REF. ANSWERS - General Info
- 2 3) Tab 2 - REF. ANSWERS - SIU Data Summary
MGD
102Uncontrollable Flow Determination
- Q UNC_Flow (Q POTW_Flow-SQSIU_Flow)
- Q POTW_Flow __________
- QSIU_Flow1 __________
- QSIU_Flow2 __________
- QUNC_Flow _____ - (____________)
- __________ of Uncontrollable Flow
- to the POTW
103Uncontrollable Flow Determination- Answer
- Q UNC_Flow (Q POTW_Flow-SQSIU_Flow)
- Q POTW_Flow 2.206 MGD
- QSIU_Flow1 0.187 MGD
- QSIU_Flow2 0.15 MGD
- QUNC_Flow 2.206-(0.1870.15)
- 1.869 MGD of Uncontrollable Flow
- to the POTW
104Uncontrollable Pollutant Load may be determined
in two ways
- 1)Mass Balance Method
- Sum of all SIU contributions for each POC
- Subtract this amount from the total WWTP Influent
- 2)Sampling Method
- Sample for uncontrollable pollutants per LTMP
105What Do I Need In Order To Evaluate The
Uncontrollable Load To The POTW- Using The Mass
Balance Method?
- POTW Influent Data
- Flow data (actually from effluent)
- Pollutant data
- SIU Effluent Data
- Flow data
- Pollutant data
106Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Using the Mass
Balance Method
107Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- LUNCMB_BOD
- (8.34)(QPOTW)(CINF)-S(8.34)(QSIUn)(CSIUn
) - QPOTWAverage POTW Flow, MGD1
- CINF_BOD Average Influent BOD, mg/L2
- QSIUn_Flow Average SIUn Flow, MGD3
- CSIUn_BOD Average SIUn BOD, mg/L4
- 1 -4) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS -General Info,-
Removal Rate Summary, - SIU Data Summary, SIU Data Summary
108Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- LUNCMB_BOD (8.34)(QPOTW)(CINF)-S(8.34)(QSIUn)(C
SIUn) - QPOTW_Flow _______ MGD
- CINF_BOD _______ mg/L
- QSIU1_Flow _______MGD
- CSIU1_BOD _______mg/L
- QSIU2_Flow _______MGD
- CSIU2_BOD _______mg/L
109Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- LUNCMB_BOD (8.34)(QPOTW)(CINF)-S(8.34)(QSIUn)(C
SIUn) - QPOTW_Flow 2.206 MGD
- CINF_BOD 195 mg/L
- QSIU1_Flow 0.187 MGD
- CSIU1_BOD 75 mg/L
- QSIU2_Flow 0.15 MGD
- CSIU2_BOD 311 mg/L
110Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- STEP ONE Solve for SIU BOD Load
- SIU1 (8.34)(QSIU1)(CSIU1_BOD)1
- SIU1 (8.34)(_____)(_________)1 _______
lbs./day - SIU2 (8.34)(QSIU2)(CSIU2_BOD)2
- SIU2 (8.34)(_____)(_________)2 _______
lbs./day - TOTAL SIU CONTRIBUTION
- _____________ __________ __________
- 1 2) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - SIU Data Summary
111Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- STEP ONE Solve for SIU BOD Load
- SIU1 (8.34)(QSIU1)(CSIU1_BOD)1
- SIU1 (8.34)(0.187 MGD)(75 mg/l)1 117 lbs./day
- SIU2 (8.34)(QSIU2)(CSIU2_BOD)2
- SIU2 (8.34)(0.150 MGD)(311 mg/l)2 389
lbs./day - TOTAL SIU CONTRIBUTION
- 117 lbs/day 389 lbs/day 506 lbs/day
- 1 2) TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - SIU Data Summary
112Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Mass Balance
Method for BOD
- STEP TWO
- Solve for Influent BOD to the POTW
- POTW Influent BOD (8.34)(QPOTW)(CINF)
- POTW_INF_BOD (8.34)(2.206)(195) 3588 lbs./day
113Uncontrollable Pollutant Load Mass Balance - BOD
Answer
- STEP THREE
- Solve for Uncontrollable BOD Load
- LUNCMB_BOD (3588) - (506)
- 3082 lbs./day
- of Uncontrollable BOD to the POTW
114Uncontrollable Pollutant Load Confirm Mass
Balance Answer
- BACK CALCULATE FOR EQUIVILANT
- BOD IN mg/L
- POTW_Uncontrollable Uncon_BOD in lbs./day
- (8.34)(QUNC)
- Back Calculate to see if this number makes sense
115Uncontrollable Pollutant Load Confirm Mass
Balance Answer
- BACK CALCULATE FOR EQUIVILANT
- BOD IN mg/L
- POTW_INF_BOD 3082
- (8.34)(1.869)
- 198 mg/L of BOD from Uncontrollable
Sources
116What Do I need to Calculate Uncontrollable Load
- Using the Sampling Method?
- SIU Effluent data
- Flow data
- POTW Influent data
- Flow data (actually from effluent)
- DENR Approved Sampling Location
- for Uncontrollable Determination!!
117Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Sampling Method
- LUNCs (8.34)(CUNC)(Uncontrollable Flow)
LUNCS Uncontrollable Loading Sampling,
lbs/day CUNC Uncontrollable Pollutant
Concentrations Uncontrollable Flow from previous
Calculations
118Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Sampling Method
for BOD
- LUNC_BOD
- (8.34)(_ CUNC_BOD mg/l)(Uncontrollable Flow MGD)
-
- (8.34)(_______mg/l)(_________MGD)
- CUNC_BOD Uncontrollable BOD as sampled, mg/L1
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS -General Info
- Uncontrollable Flow from previous calculations
119Uncontrollable Pollutant Load- Sampling Method
for BOD
- LUNC_BOD
- (8.34)(CUNC_BOD)(Uncontrollable Flow)
- CUNC_BOD 350 mg/L1
- Uncontrollable Flow 1.869 MGD
- 1)As sampled in LTMP. See TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS
- General Info
120Uncontrollable Pollutant Load Sampling Method -
BOD Answer
- LUNC_BOD
- (8.34)(350)(1.869)
- 5456 lbs./day
- or 350 mg/l (as sampled in LTMP)
- Do I use 350 mg/l or 198 mg/l as my
Uncontrollable Load?
121Uncontrollable Pollutant Load Confirm Sampling
Method Results
- Which number makes sense? What is a typical
Uncontrollable value for BOD? - Should I use the Mass Balance Method number of
198 mg/L - or
- the Sampling Method number of 350 mg/L
- or
- the literature value of 220 mg/l?
- Wastewater Engineering, Metcalf Eddy, 3rd
Edition.
122Mass Balance Vs. Sampling Method Comparison
- Mass Balance Sampling Literature
-
- 198 mg/L 350 mg/L
220 mg/L - 3082 lbs./day 5456 lbs./day
3429 lbs./day - use 3082 lbs./day (198 mg/L) as Uncontrollable
Load because - 1) the average Influent BOD is only 3587 lbs./day
- 2) 198 mg/L of BOD makes more sense then 350 mg/L
- Most of the influent is from uncontrollable
sources
or
or
123Uncontrollable Sampling Troubleshooting
- Sample location not really uncontrollable, i.e.
- 1 house and 27 restaurants
- new subdivision (low flow toilets, no sewer
leaks) - No commercial and/or non-SIU
- Inaccurate sample collection
- May need 1 sampling point or a larger data set
- Flow may be too low
- BOD will degrade in the collection system
124Uncontrollable Mass Balance Troubleshooting
- Inaccurate flow or pollutant data
- in particular- SIU flow data
- Limited data set
- Widely variable detection levels
- Inflow and Infiltration
- Degradation of the pollutant in the collection
system - Conservative/non conservative pollutant
Review SIU Uncontrollable and HWA.AT Spreadsheets
125 - Determines the Amount of MAHL
- Available to your Industries
126Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL)
- MAIL MAHL- LUNC
- MAIL Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading,
lbs./day - MAHL Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading,
lbs./day1 - LUNC Uncontrollable Loading, lbs./day2
- 1 2) See the next slide for this information.
127MAHL And Uncontrollable BOD Values Revisited
- MAHL BOD 8,340 lbs./day
- from Design Criteria
- as determined earlier
- minus
- Uncontrollable BOD 3082 lbs./day
- from the Mass Balance Method
- as determined earlier
- MAIL __________________
128Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading for BOD
- MAIL_BOD MAHL_BOD- LUNC_BOD
- MAHL_BOD 8,340 lbs./day
- LUNC_BOD 3,082 lbs./day
- MAIL_BOD(8,340- 3082)
- 5,258 lbs./day
- of BOD Available to SIUs (MAIL)
129Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL)For
Each POC
Review HWA.AT Spreadsheet!!
130 - Allocating The MAIL To Your Industries
131Sample AT- For Cadmium
See the next slide for this information
132Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL)For
Each POC
133Over Allocated For Cadmium!
134What Do I Do When Im Over Allocated?
- Does this over allocation make sense?
- Are you violating MAHL Criteria based on
- 1) NPDES/NC Water Quality Standards
- 2) Biological Inhibition
- 3) Sludge Criteria
- If NO, then Reevaluate the MAHL
135What Do I Do When Im Over Allocated?
- Generally-
- Are the Uncontrollable values appropriate?
- Is the Removal Rate correct?
- Specifically
- Is Inhibition Limiting?
- If yes Can you use site specific Inhibition
Criteria? - Is Sludge Limiting?
- If yes, Can you perform the HASL Worksheet?
- Can you lower SIU limits (pollutant or flow)?
136What Do I Do When Im Over Allocated? EXAMPLE- Cd
- For OZ Cadmium is limited by the Cumulative
Sludge Criteria - Is OZ violating their Land Application Program?1
- Can we use the HASL?
- 1)TAB 2 - REF ANSWERS - Sludge Permit- Land
Application Summary
137 - Headworks Addendum for Sludge Loading
- (Updated January 2004)
138HASL Worksheet
- Re-evaluates MAHL for Sludge Criteria by taking
into consideration - Historical WWTF Performance Data,
- Historical Sludge Report Data, and
- Applicable Sludge Criteria.
Only applicable for pollutants over allocated
based on sludge criteria!
Only applicable for pollutants over allocated
based on sludge criteria!
139HASL Worksheet
- Three Steps to completing HASL
- Cumulative Sludge Criteria (lb/acre) Check
Cumulative Sludge Criteria. If available land is
over 80 of criteria, you can not use HASL
worksheet to alleviate over-allocation due to
sludge standards. - Sludge Ceiling Criteria (mg/dry kg) Calculate
of Ceiling Concentration Limit based on maximum
concentration from sludge report. If ceiling
concentration is over 80 of criteria, you can
not use HASL worksheet to alleviate
over-allocation due to sludge standards. - Recalculate Sludge MAHL Using historical WWTF
influent and the of Ceiling Concentration
Limit, recalculate a new sludge MAHL.
140What Do I Need For A HASL?
- Copy of your current Sludge Permit
- Copy of the current Annual Sludge Report
- Historic WWTF Influent Data
- HASL Worksheet and Calculations
141HASL Step 1 - CadmiumCumulative Criteria
- Check each POC to assure that the available land
does not exceed 80 of the Cumulative Loading
Rate.
For the Pretreatment World the most heavily
loaded field is the field with the highest
cumulative lbs/acre for that pollutant.
142HASL Step 1 - CadmiumCumulative Criteria
For the Pretreatment World the most heavily
loaded field is the field with the highest
cumulative lbs/acre for that pollutant.
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS Annual Field Summary Form
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS -Land Application Permit
143HASL Step 1 - CadmiumCumulative Criteria -
Answer
0.37 is much less then 80 Looks good for
Cadmium so far!!!
144HASL Step 2 - Cadmium Sludge Ceiling Criteria
2. Calculate the of Ceiling Concentration
of Ceiling Concentration Limit
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Annual Residual Sampling
Summary Form - TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS - Land Application Permit
145HASL Step 2 - CadmiumSludge Ceiling Criteria -
Answer
2. Calculate the of Ceiling Concentration
3.6 is much less then 80 So can use HASL to
resolve over allocation for Cadmium!!!
146HASL Step 3 - Cadmium Recalculate Sludge MAHL
A new Sludge MAHL is calculated using historical
WWTF influent and the of Ceiling Concentration
Limit.
147HASL Step 3 - Cadmium Recalculate Sludge MAHL
Part 1
1. Calculate the Average Influent Loading
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS Removal Rates Summary
- TAB 2 - REF. ANSWERS General Info.
148HASL Step 3 - Cadmium Recalculate Sludge MAHL
Part 1 - Answer
1. Calculate the Average Influent Loading
149HASL Step 3 - Cadmium Recalculate Sludge
MAHL Part 2
- Calculate a new Sludge MAHL based on Historical
Influent Data and the Sludge Ceiling Limit is
calculated.
- All values previously calculated
150HASL Step 3 - Cadmium Sludge Ceiling Criteria
- Part 2 - Answer
151Now What?
- If there are sludge violations you can not use
the HASL Worksheet! Call DWQ! - If HASL indicates Flags, then you must do a
Metals Management plan - call DWQ! - If HASL is applicable, then input an x in the
appropriate cell of the HWA spreadsheet (MAIL
Calcs) to - Include the Sludge Ceiling MAHL from the HASL
worksheet in the HWA spreadsheet (Sludge Loading
Calcs) - Ignore the Cumulative Sludge MAHL values in the
HWA Spreadsheet - Select the Sludge Ceiling MAHL from the HASL
worksheet as the minimum sludge loading criteria
in the HWA Spreadsheet.
Review HWA HASL Spreadsheet!!
152NEW AT For Cadmium- Using HASL MAHL in HWA
153Over Allocated?- NO!
- Do This For All POCs
- A complete copy of the OZ HWA
- can be found in the TAB 2 REF. ANSWERS - Final
HWA and AT Class Example - Any Questions?-Please Call
154HWA FLOW CHART
Pass Thru
Removal Rates
MAIL
Inhibition
Sludge
Reduce SIU Limits?
Yes
5 years or major change to WWTP or new NPDES
permit
Finished
155What To Submit to NCDENR?
- Letter of Transmittal
- Organized Data Summaries-
- LTMP, SIU, Uncontrollable, and DMR
- Data from all sampling sites in your approved
LTMP - Removal Rate Calculations
- HWA Spread Sheets
- MAHL Criteria, MAIL, and Uncontrollable
Calculations - HASL (if necessary)
- Allocation Table
- Copy of Land Application or Composting permit
- Explanation of Assumptions
156Extra HWA Info
- Typical Problems with HWA
- Extra Numbers
- standards,
- detection levels,
- literature uncontrollable, inhibition, and
removal rates - HWA Excel Spreadsheets
157DENR Address and FAX
- 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
- RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
- FAX 919-733-0059
158DWQ Pretreatment Website
- Homepage
- http//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/percs/
- Click On Left Bar
- For
- Pretreatment and then,
- Headworks Analysis and
- Workshops
159DWQ Pretreatment Contacts
Phone 919-733-5083 email firstname.lastname_at_n
cmail.net
- To Be Re-Assigned
- Broad
- Chowan
- French Broad
- Hiwassee
- Little Tennessee
- Lumber
- Roanoke
- Tar Pamlico
- Adrian Eaton - ext. 580
- Cape Fear
- Dana Folley - ext. 523
- Catawba
- Neuse
- New
- Tom Ascenzo - ext. 526
- Yadkin Pee-Dee
Thank You!