Chapter 5 Portfolio Allocation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 5 Portfolio Allocation

Description:

As wealth increases, the amount held of all assets tends to increase ... expected return for extra risk (Buyers of lottery tickets, gamblers in Los Vegas) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: pc7546
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 5 Portfolio Allocation


1
Chapter 5Portfolio Allocation
2
Some Data ()
3
Factors in Portfolio Choice
  • Wealth
  • Expected Return
  • Risk
  • Liquidity
  • Information costs

4
Wealth
  • As wealth increases, the amount held of all
    assets tends to increase
  • Demand for some assets increases more than in
    proportion and others, less
  • Wealth elasticity of demand
  • change in amount held/ change in wealth

5
Facts about Wealth Elasticity E
  • As wealth increases,
  • The assets share in the portfolio falls if E
  • (Such assets are called necessities)
  • The share stays constant if E 1
  • The share rises if E 1
  • (Such assets are called luxuries)
  • E averages 1 across the portfolio so the
    typical asset has E 1

6
Example
  • Consider a person who allocates her wealth of 100
    as follows 50 in bonds, 50 in stock.
  • Suppose her wealth rises 10 to 110, and she
    holds 53 in bonds (6 more) and 57 in stock (14
    more).
  • Wealth elasticity of bonds 6/10 0.6
  • Wealth elasticity of stocks 14/10 1.4
  • The wealth elasticity must average 1
  • (50/100)?0.6 (50/100)?1.4 1.

7
Expected Return
  • The most important factor
  • The higher an assets expected return is relative
    to other assets, the more is held
  • Example The expected return of an asset rises
    while the expected returns on all other assets
    remain unchanged. Result More of the former and
    less of the latter are held.

8
Riskiness
  • Next in importance after expected return
  • An asset is risky if its return cant be
    predicted perfectly.
  • The riskier an asset is relative to other assets,
    the less of it is held
  • Example The risk of one asset rises while the
    risks on all other assets remain unchanged.
    Result Less of the former and more of the latter
    are held.

9
Example 1 NYSE Stock
  • Until recently, the expected real rate of return
    on the typical NYSE stock was about 8/yr since
    1926
  • The standard deviation was 49/yr
  • Implications
  • One year in six, real return 8 49 57
  • One year in six, real return
  • 10K becomes 15.7K with probability 1/6 and 5.9K with probability 1/6.
  • High expected return but very risky!

10
Example 2 Treasury Bills
  • Expected real return on Tbills has been about
    1/yr since 1926
  • Standard deviation has been about 1/yr
  • Implications
  • One year in six, real return 1 1 2
  • One year in six, real return
  • 10K becomes 10.2K with probability 1/6 and 10K with probability 1/6.
  • Low expected return but not very risky

11
Risk Preferences
  • Risk-adverse persons prefer less risk to more and
    give up expected return for risk reduction (Most
    asset holders)
  • Risk-neutral persons only care about expected
    return (Firms in theory)
  • Risk-loving persons give up expected return for
    extra risk (Buyers of lottery tickets, gamblers
    in Los Vegas)

12
Liquidity
  • The more liquid an asset is relative to other
    assets, the more is held
  • Liquidity is valued because it may be important
    to be able to quickly sell an asset
  • Illiquid assets require higher expected returns
    than liquid assets
  • Cash is perfectly liquid

13
Information Costs
  • The more transparent and anonymous an asset is
    and the less monitoring it requires relative to
    other assets, the more is held.
  • Example Treasury bills vs. limited partnerships

14
Diversification
  • Holding many assets with returns that do not move
    in lockstep reduces portfolio risk
  • Example Two assets A and B
  • Four possible cases 1, 2, 3, 4
  • A earns 20 in cases 1 and 2 and 0 in cases 3
    and 4
  • B earns 20 in cases 1 and 3 and 0 in cases 2
    and 4
  • Each case has probability ¼ of happening

15
Table
16
Calculations
  • Expected returns
  • A ¼x20 ¼x20 ¼x0 ¼x0 10
  • B ¼x20 ¼x0 ¼x20 ¼x0 10
  • ½A½B ¼x20 ¼x10 ¼x10 ¼x0 10
  • Standard Deviations
  • A ¼(20-10)2 ¼(20-10)2 ¼(0-10)2
    ¼x(0-10)21/2
  • 1001/2 10
  • B ¼(20-10)2 ¼(0-10)2 ¼(20-10)2
    ¼(0-10)21/2
  • 1001/2 10
  • ½A½B ¼(20-10)2 ¼(10-10)2 ¼(10-10)2
    ¼(0-10)21/2
  • 501/2 7.07

17
On average, portfolios of N randomly selected
NYSE stocks had annual returns with the following
standard deviations as a function of N
18
Limits to Diversification
  • Diversification can greatly reduce risk but
    cannot eliminate it
  • It eliminates unsystematic or idiosyncratic risk
  • It cannot eliminate systematic or market risk
  • The systematic risk of an asset is measured by
    its beta

19
Beta
  • Beta gets its name from a statistical procedure
    called regression, which estimates relationships
    among variables.
  • The beta of an asset measures how closely its
    return moves with the return on a portfolio of
    all assets.

Rit
Regression equation Rit ai ßiRmt eit
Slope ßi
Std dev measures idiosyncratic risk.
ai
2/3 points w/i dashed lines
Rmt
20
More on Beta
  • Examples
  • If an assets beta .5, its return moves half as
    much on average as the markets.
  • If an assets beta 2, its return moves twice
    as much on average as the markets.
  • An assets expected return is higher, the higher
    its beta

21
Examples of Some Betas
22
Postwar Portfolio Changes
  • Checking accounts fell from 13 in 1950 to 1 in
    2000
  • Wealth elasticity
  • Deregulation afforded more choice i.e. higher
    expected returns became available elsewhere
  • SDs and TDs fell from 23 in 1970 to 15 in 2000
  • Deregulation again i.e. higher expected returns
    became available elsewhere
  • Bonds etc. fell from 24 in 1950 to 8 in 2000
  • Supply changes changes in relative expected
    returns

23
More on Postwar Portfolio Changes
  • Rise in equity mutual funds from 2 in 1970 to
    11 in 2000
  • Computer revolution and its effect on expected
    returns
  • Decline in life insurance reserves from 13 in
    1950 to 3 in 2000
  • Effects of deregulation and term life on expected
    return available elsewhere
  • Rise in pension reserves from 6 in 1950 to 35
    in 2000
  • Wealth elasticity 1
  • Changes in the tax system and their effects on
    expected returns
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com