Title: Performance Evaluation and Risk Management
1Performance Evaluation and Risk Management
13
2Performance Evaluation
- Can anyone consistently earn an excess return,
thereby beating the market? - Performance evaluation is a term for assessing
how well a money manager achieves a balance
between high returns and acceptable risks.
3Performance Evaluation Measures
- The raw return on a portfolio, RP, is simply the
total percentage return on a portfolio. - The raw return has no adjustment for risk.
- The raw return is not compared to any benchmark,
or standard. - Therefore, the usefulness of the raw return on a
portfolio is limited.
4Performance Evaluation Measures
- The Sharpe Ratio
- The Sharpe ratio is a reward-to-risk ratio that
focuses on total risk. - It is computed as a portfolios risk premium
divided by the standard deviation for the
portfolios return.
5Performance Evaluation Measures
- The Sharpe Ratio
- Find the Sharpe ratio for the portfolio below
- The Media Portfolio has average return of 16,
standard deviation of 20. - The risk-free rate is 6
6Performance Evaluation Measures
- The Treynor Ratio
- The Treynor ratio is a reward-to-risk ratio that
looks at systematic risk only. - It is computed as a portfolios risk premium
divided by the portfolios beta coefficient.
7Performance Evaluation Measures
- The Treynor Ratio
- Find the Treynor ratio for the Media Portfolio,
assuming a beta of 0.8 - Average return is 16, risk free rate is 6
8Performance Evaluation Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- Jensens alpha is the excess return above or
below the security market line. It can be
interpreted as a measure of how much the
portfolio beat the market. - It is computed as the raw portfolio return less
the expected portfolio return as predicted by the
CAPM.
Actual return
Extra Return
CAPM Risk-Adjusted Predicted Return
9Performance Evaluation Measures
- Jensens Alpha
- Find Jensens alpha for the Media Portfolio
- Beta 0.8, risk-free rate is 6 and the market
rate of return is 14
Extra Return
10Jensens Alpha
11Performance Attribution
- Which investment decisions resulted in superior
or inferior performance? - Managed portfolio vs. benchmark portfolio -
Difference in performance is the sum of
contributions based on portfolio construction
decisions - Three possible components are
- Asset allocation across equity, fixed-income and
money mkts - Sector choice within each market
- Security selection within each sector
- The benchmark is called the bogey
12Bogey Performance vs. Managed Portfolio
13Bogey Performance vs. Managed Portfolio
- The managed fund outperformed the bogey by 1.37
or 137 basis points - Now we must determine which of the managers
decisions are responsible for the superior
performance of the fund - We will first examine the managers asset
allocation decisions by comparing the portfolios
composition - Cash
- Fixed Income
- Equities
14Contribution of Asset Allocation to Performance
15Contribution of Asset Allocation to Performance
- The managers asset allocation decisions caused
his portfolio to outperform the bogey - The amount of superior returns attributed to
asset allocation is 0.3099 or 30.99 basis points - The managers fund outperformed the bogey by a
total of 137 basis points - The remainder of excess performance (137 30.99
106 basis points) can be attributed to sector
selection and security selection
16Contribution of Selection Within Markets
Given Given Solve Given Solve
NOTE Money market instruments are not included,
because they are treated as cash (involves NO
security selection)!
17Contribution of Sector Selection
Within the Equity portion of the portfolio, these
are the sectors the manager picked vs. the Bogey
18Contribution of Sector Selection
- The managers equity portion outperformed the
bogey by 1.47 or 147 basis points - The managers sector selection within the equity
portion of the portfolio outperformed the bogey
by 1.29 or 129 basis points - The remaining difference (147 129 18 basis
points) can be attributed to the managers
security selection within each sector.
19Portfolio Attribution Summary
- Contribution
- 1.Asset allocation 31.0
- 2. Selection
- a. Equity
- Sector allocation 129
- Security allocation 18
- 147 x 0.70 102.9
- b. Fixed-income excess 44 x 0.07 3.1
- Total excess return 137.0 1.37
20Style Analysis
- 91.5 of the variation in returns of 82 mutual
funds could be explained by the funds asset
allocation to bills, bonds and stocks - Brinson, Singer, Beebower
- Regress fund returns on indexes representing a
range of asset classes (12) - Examine regression coefficients for each
- Fidelitys Magellan Fund had 4 positive
regression coefficients, therefore the fund
returns are well explained by only four style
portfolios - Three style portfolios explain 97.3 of returns
- Magellan vs. SP 500 shows a much wider spread
21Sharpes Style Portfolio
- Bills 0
- Intermediate Bonds 0
- Long term bonds 0
- Corporate bonds 0
- Mortgages 0
- Value stocks 0
- Growth stocks 47
- Medium-cap stocks 31
- Small stocks 18
- Foreign stocks 0
- European stocks 4
- Japanese stocks 0
- R-squared 97.3
22Market Timing
- Consider three investors
- Investor 1 Put 1 in 30 day T-bills on January
1, 1926, and rolled over all proceeds into 30-day
T-bills. - Investor 2 Put 1 in large stocks on the same
date and reinvested all dividends into the same
portfolio. - Investor 3 Shifts all funds at the beginning of
each year into either bills or stocks, whichever
is going to do better. - On December 31, 2001 who has the most money?
23Market Timing
- So, why dont we all just time the market?
- There are no perfect timers!
- Suppose the market is up two days out of three
and Investor 1 always predicts a market advance.
The investor is correct 2/3 of the time, is this
a measure of their forecasting ability? - No, we should examine the proportion of bull
markets correctly forecast and the proportion of
bear markets correctly forecast - Empirical tests show little evidence of market
timing ability
24Quick Quiz
- What does Jensens alpha measure?
- What does performance attribution tell us about
asset allocation and security selection? - Which strategy is better active or passive?