Title: Typical Effects of Voice Training
1Typical Effects of Voice Training
- Paper to be presented at PEVOC 6,
- London 31/8-4/9, 2005
-
- Peter Pabon and Rob Stallinga,
- Royal Conservatory, Den Haag,
- The Netherlands.
2Phonetogram recordings of one female classical
singing student showing some typical intermediate
changes during the study. Front Crest factor,
red chest voice quality. Back Previous
recording blue.
entrance
2 years
3 years
4 years, final
3Questions to ask
4Subjects / Material
- Singing department is the largest in the Royal
Conservatory. - Population ca. 180 students spread over 14
years. Predominantly female (80), classical
singing (90). - Ca. 45-50 new students enter each year.
- Entrance / first year phonetogram recordings made
of 97 students over 3 successive years. - An aselect group was recorded intermediately.
- Final recordings, made of 38 students.
- Only for 20 students complete and usable
questionaire and uniform phonetogram material.
5Questionnaire
6Recording method
- Machines, room, parameters, colour coding
7Device comparison recordings made at the same
moment with both the old and the new computer
phonetograph.
Front (red-green) new device Voice
Profiler Back (blue) old device M96000
Simultaneous recordings Front (red-green) old
device M96000 Back (blue) new device Voice
Profiler
Subject 1
Subject 2
8Protocol
- Allways
- Standing position.
- Only vowel /a/.
- Visual feedback on the screen.
- Complete filling of the phonetogram inner area.
- First recording
- All extremes, chest plus falsetto!
- Even if not accustomed or forbidden to do so.
- No limitation to a nice or desired quality only.
- Final recording(s)
- 1st Only using trained (mixing)
quality/technique, - 2nd Chest voice or Falsetto voice, any register
or quality that was avoided in the 1st. - As an extra stimulus the old recording was placed
at the back as a target to match during the 2nd
recording.
9Questionnaire results Q If you use mixing, what
method do you use, if possible give some simple
key words?
- Maintaining speaking voice quality when going up
or down. - Speak the words and use that as the core for
singing. - Open, high speaking voice is the reference.
- Bring your head voice quality down, avoid chest
voice. - Good breath support, free neck, singing to front
teeth. - I do not focus on it at all, I just developed it.
- I dont isolate chest and head voice.
- I use a little bit of head in my chest voice so
to avoid the break and therefore to mix. - Speaking voice present in all ranges, low present
in high, high present in low. - Stay in high position, larynx relaxed, in
resonance position/articulation of words. - Small words, good breathing, not closing the
resonance. - Openness of high register, quality of low
register. - Remain speaking while singing.
- Maintain a free sound/resonance.
- I focus not on placing but on allowing it to move
where it needs to go, method breathing and
speaking. - To use my body as well.
10Female classical singing student group Combined
effects, 10 voices averaged.Phonation density,
contour set at 50
Begin study
11Female classical singing student group Combined
effects, 10 voices averaged.Phonation density,
contour set at 50
End study, mixed voice only
12Female classical singing student group Combined
effects, 10 voices averaged.Phonation density,
contour set at 50
13Female classical singing students average 10
voices, 50 contour, Crest factorEnd study in
front, Begin at the back (blue)
- What is gained is made pink
Front only using mixed voice
14Female classical singing students average 10
voices, 50 contour, Crest factorEnd study in
front, Begin at the back (blue)
- What is gained is made pink
Front also using chest voice
15Conclusions Mixing
- Extreme levels reached in mid / mixed range
severely drop. - Complete deficit to used pushed chest voice.
- The large level drop is not noted by students and
teachers. - Mixed voice is in this case low pitched falsetto
mode. - Male mixed voice is likely to be using a
different mechanism.