Title: MUON TRACKER FOR CBM experiment
1MUON TRACKER FOR CBM experiment
Detector Choice
Murthy S. Ganti, VEC Centre
2Highest hit density expected at various muon
stations (URQMD, central)
Effective rate 10MHz/Cm2
3Comparison of detectors..
Both GEM MICROMEGAS are suitable for high rate
applications
4Gas Electron Multiplier - GEM
Manufactured with technology developed at CERN
100-150 µm
Typical geometry 5 µm Cu on 50 µm Kapton 70 µm
holes at 140 mm pitch
5GEM..
Thin metal-coated polyimide foil chemically
etched to form high density of holes. On
application of a voltage gradient, electrons
released on the top side drift into the hole,
multiply in avalanche and transfer to the other
side. Proportional gains above 103 are obtained
in most common gases.
F. Sauli, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A386(1997)531
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Multi GEM configurations..
11Single-Double-Triple GEM
Multiple structures provide equal gain at lower
voltage The discharge probability on exposure to
a particles is strongly reduced
For a gain of 8000 (required for full efficiency
on minimum ionizing tracks) in the TGEM the
discharge probability is not measurable.
S. Bachmann et al, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A479
(2002) 294
12GEM..
13GEM..
14GEM..
15Narrow charge distribution problem..
16GEM
- High (100 mm) pitch small pad response function
- No ExB effects better resolution
- Direct electron signal no losses
- Efficient ion collection
- Easy to build
- Robust to aging insensitive to LHC backgrounds
- Multi-stage structures large gains (103-104)
- Low mass construction no wire frames
17Issues of implementing GEM in Large area
detectors..
- Only a few sources of supply
- Large area GEM foils are difficult to
fabricate. Small foils leave large dead areas in
the tracking plane - Single stage GEM gain is low
- Expensive (relative)
18MICROMEGAS..
High (50 mm) pitch small pad response function No
ExB effects better resolution Direct electron
signal no losses Funnel effect very efficient
ion collection Electron amplification independent
of the gap to first order promising dE/dx Easy
to build dead zones potentially small Robust to
aging insensitive to LHC backgrounds Good
electro-mechanical stability large gains (103
-104) Low mass construction no wire frames
19MICROMEGAS discharges ..
- Detailed investigations have shown that the rate
capability of the gaseous detector strongly - depends of the type of the incident particle
beam and the nature of the gas mixture. A test in
a - high energy muon beam at a rate of 108/s showed
that Micromegas can cope with very high flux of - these particles.
- However, an undesirable effect has been observed
when the incident beam is composed by high- - energy hadrons a discharge rate proportional
to the incident hadron rate. It is believed that
- sparks are triggered by large charge deposits
in the drift space from recoil nuclei produced by
- charged particles, especially hadrons,
traversing the detector. In the case of muons the
- corresponding cross section is several orders
of magnitudes lower, therefore the probability to
- induce sparks is negligible.
- Several investigations in the PS beam have shown
a continuous decrease of the discharge - probability from heavy to light gas fillings.
The most promising are Helium mixtures and the
effect - is illustrated in Fig.1. With a gas mixture of
He 10 Isobutane the discharge probability - decreases with the cathode mesh voltage of the
detector at 420 Volts, the lowest required - voltage for full detection efficiency, the
probability reaches a value (lt108) that is
suitable for safe - operation of the detector in high particle
environment.
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22Mesh Choice for MICROMEGAS..
Copper with integrated polyimide pillars (by
etching technology
Electroformed mesh
SS woven mesh
Advantages of Woven mesh
1. they exist in rolls of 4 m x 40 m and are
quite inexpensive, 2. they are commonly produced
by several companies over the world, 3. there are
many metals available Fe, Cu, Ti, Ni, Au, 4.
they are more robust for stretching and handling.
23Mass produced MICROMEGAS
24Double mesh MICROMEGAS
- Protection of Front end electronics from
discharges - Cathode and readout pad plane are separated
S. Kane et al./NIM A 505(2003)215-218 Purdue
University
25- MICROMEGAS Some practical questions
- Choice of wire mesh Woven vs. electro-formed
vs. etched copper clad kapton - Bulk MICROMEGAS pillars of photo resist. Also
other spacers like fish line - How to optimize ion backflow? Practical
limitations of mesh aperture(LPI) - Minimizing discharges due to heavily ionizing
particles ( nuclear recoils) - Choice of gas mixtures
- Muon tracking at high rates how to widen pad
response function? - Need of resistive coating ( Cermet, graphite)
- Other readout schemes Second anode mesh and a
separate readout pad plane - Practical construction
- How to
paste mesh to frame? how to protect mesh edges? - How much
Minimum frame width? - How to
tap HV connection? - Frame
material, rigidity - Mesh sag
due to temperature fluctuations - Invar
mesh (shadow mask of CRTs)? - Effect of
pad ridges on field uniformity
26Thick GEM.. Worth investigating further for CBM
Muon Tracker..
27Design concepts..
- Wheel type design of planes with 8 sector type
chambers in each plane - Each sector with a single woven mesh supported
on insulating pillars or THGEM - Readout pad granularity to vary from 3mm to 7mm
pads radially in 3 zones - to keep occupancy
within 10 level - (needs further optimization study)
28Lot of Work to do!