Title: Michael T. Frank
1Converting Stock Awards in a Merger or
Acquisition July 12, 2006
- Michael T. Frank
- DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP
- 2000 University Avenue
- East Palo Alto, CA 94303
- (650) 833-2000
- michael.frank_at_dlapiper.com
Ellen N. Sueda Hewlett-Packard Company 3000
Hanover Street, MS 1050 Palo Alto, CA 43304 (650)
857-3984 ellen.sueda_at_hp.com
2What Do the Plans Provide?
- Targets Plan
- Does the Plan permit conversion of awards?
- Does the Plan permit early termination of awards
that will not be continued? - Are there notice or consent provisions?
- Buyers Plan
- Does the Plan provide for substitution of awards?
2
3Should Buyer Convert Awards?
- Determine the retention impact
- Part or full acceleration of vesting upon the
change may impact retention planning - Buyer may not want to convert options if there is
no retention value
3
4Should Buyer Convert Awards?
- Consider tax impact
- The loss of qualification of ISOs with
acceleration of options due to the ISO 100K
limit - Section 280G non-deductibility of certain
accelerated awards and compensation - Consider the number of former employees of Target
who hold awards - Securities held by a former employee may require
additional securities filings
4
5Should Buyer Convert Awards?
- Non-U.S. jurisdictions
- Determine labor/employment laws, regulatory
requirements, e.g., governmental filings, and
foreign exchange requirements - Determine if awardees subject to immediate
taxation upon the change of control - Consider Buyers policies concerning awards in
various jurisdictions
5
6Retention
- Buyer may not want to convert awards that have no
retention value, e.g., awards that have full
acceleration of vesting upon a change of control - Do not forget to review individual employment
agreements or arrangements in addition to the
plan and individual award agreements - Consider the following
- Consent from key employees to amend awards to
remove or modify acceleration of vesting - If a cash deal, arrange for a holdback of award
proceeds for key employees (do not forget about
409A)
6
7Due Diligence
- A good due diligence list is important. It will
remind you of the pitfalls and challenges of
mergers and acquisitions!
7
8Assume or Substitute?
- Assumption Pros
- Preserves your share reserve
- Can grant assumed reserve shares, but not for
employees of Buyer
8
9Assume or Substitute?
- Assumption Cons
- Multiple share buckets in multiple deals
- Awards treated as non-shareholder approved for
201(d) table in proxy/10-K - Additional overhang
- Form S-8 filing, including a prospectus
- Administration of another plans terms and
conditions in addition to already existing plans - Who will administer the plan and update
prospectus? - Different plan terms and conditions complicate
any future communications - Reserves and registration need to be tracked
separately
9
10Assume or Substitute?
- Substitution Pros
- One share reserve
- May be able to harmonize rules (beware ISO
modification and 409A) - Report awards as shareholder approved in the
proxy - No separate Form S-8 filing
- No need to administer another plans terms and
conditions however, if material terms are
preserved and are different from regular option
grant terms, then should be described in the
prospectus and other communications (also, watch
modification)
11Assume or Substitute?
- Substitution Cons
- Impacts existing share reserve
- Changing terms may require optionee consent and
cause confusion to optionees
12Conversion Mechanics
- Preserve Aggregate Spread
- Typically, when applying the conversion ratio,
round price up and round share number down - Preserve Ratio of Fair market Value to Strike
Prices - Example
- Target holds an option to buy 100 shares _at_ 5
per share. Target shares worth 10 at closing.
Buyer shares worth 20 at closing. Target option
becomes buyer option to buy 50 buyer shares _at_10 - Used to retain ISO status and avoid 409A problems
12
13Restricted Stock Specific Issues
- Does Plan require explicit assumption/assignment
of forfeiture or repurchase right? - Cash deal right to get cash?
- Securities law issue of treating shareholders of
the same class of stock differently
14Employee Stock Purchase Plans
- Generally are terminated upon an acquisition
- Target should expect that its ESPP will be
terminated and ensure that the plan document
provides for mid-period termination
14
15Additional Issues to Consider
- ISO rules
- 409A compliance
- Earn outs
- Cash transactions
- Grant documentation (accounting or 409A issues?)
15
16ISO Issues
- Is there a 100K limitation issue?
- Will acceleration of options disqualify all or
part of the option? - Will there be any modification causing a
disqualification? - Conversion mechanics nearest whole cause a
disqualification? E.g., rounding shares up or
rounding strike price down - If substituting, does Buyers plan provide for
applicable ISO rules?
16
17Section 409A Issues
- Discounted stock options
- Option pricing history and methodology
- Reasonable valuation or safe harbor for stock
valuation for private companies - Modification of plans or stock awards after
12/31/04 - Extension of exercise period?
- Faulty conversion?
- Repricing?
- RSUs with retirement features and/or deferral of
equity awards
17
18Earn Out Issues
- Exchange of share right for earnout right?
- Including earn out right in option
18
19Negotiation Items
- Have Target revise non-compliant plans and
arrangements, e.g., reprice or limit exercise on
discounted options. - Special Indemnity Escrow?
- Cover future compliance and other HR costs?
- Consider in light of Section 409A and recent
option backdating issues - Adjust purchase price by amount necessary to
gross-up taxes, e.g., 409A or 280G, and cost of
withholding/reporting, or include adjustments as
part of the escrow arrangement.
19
20For Questions Please Contact
- Michael T. Frank
- DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP
- 2000 University Avenue
- East Palo Alto, CA 94303
- (650) 833-2000
- michael.frank_at_dlapiper.com