Relativism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Relativism

Description:

S – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:462
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: heba3
Category:
Tags: relativism | ssed

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relativism


1
  • Relativism

2
Im skeptical about cultural relativism
3
Concepts
  • Reducio ad absurdem argument
  • False dichotomy
  • Ethical Universalism
  • Ethical Relativism
  • Reflective Equilibrium
  • Theme Its alright to be wrong!

4
SubjectivismTruth is relative to individuals
  • The view thatwhatever anyone believes is true.
  • Plato Protagorasadmittingthat everybodys
    opinion is true, must acknowledge the truth of
    his opponents belief about his own belief, where
    they think he is wrong.

5
They cant both be right
San Diego isnorth of LosAngeles.
Yourewrong!
6
Argument against subjectivism
  1. Suppose subjectivism were true If a person
    believes that P, then P assume subjectivism
    for reductio
  2. x believes that P and y believes that x is wrong
    in believing that P, i.e. y believes that not-P
    people disagree
  3. P and not-P by 1 and 2
  4. Subjectivism is false reductio given that
    people disagree, subjectivism implies a
    contradiction

7
Is ethics a game without rules?
8
Ethical Relativism
  • There are no true universal moral judgments.
  • Moral judgments
  • __ is wrong
  • __ is right
  • __ is obligatory
  • __ is good
  • __ is bad
  • Etc.

9
False Dichotomy
  • The fallacy of false dichotomy is committed when
    the arguer claims that his conclusion is one of
    only two options, when in fact there are other
    possibilities.
  • The arguer then goes on to show that the 'only
    other option' is clearly outrageous, and so his
    preferred conclusion must be embraced.

If the Ten Commandmentsarent absolutely true
withno exceptions thenanything goes!
10
Thou shalt not lie.
I wouldnt becaught dead in that rig.
Cuteoutfit!
  • What about white lies?

11
Thou shalt not steal.
  • What about Jean Valjean stealing that loaf of
    bread when he was starving?

12
Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.
And it came to pass, that he went through the
corn fields on the sabbath day and his disciples
began, as they went, to pluck the ears of corn.
And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do
they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?
And he said unto themMark 223 -27
The Sabbath was made for man--not man for the
Sabbath.
13
Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.
NO!
14
Ethical Relativism vs. Ethical Universalism
  • Ethical relativists hold that there is no kind of
    action that is always, everywhere and for
    everyone right or wrong.
  • Ethical universalists hold that there is some (at
    least one) kind of action that is always,
    everywhere and for everyone right or wrong.
  • This kind can be highly abstract!
  • Ethical universalists do not claim that every
    kind of action is either always right or always
    wrong!

15
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
You break your promise to give a madman a gun on
Tuesday.
  • Promise-breaking
  • Breaking a promise when keeping itwould have
    very bad consequences
  • Doing something on a Tuesday
  • Doing an action that brings about the
    greatestgood for the greatest number
  • Doing an action with the intention of preventing
    someone else from being harmed

16
What features of an action are morally relevant?
  • We ask what features of an action are morally
    relevant?
  • Surely not, e.g. the day on which it was done
  • We ask what are the right-making or wrong-making
    features of actions?
  • Every action belongs to many kinds
  • Which kinds are morally relevant?

17
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
18
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
19
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
20
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
21
Kinds of actionsAn action can belong to many
different kinds!
22
Moral Principles
  • An individual action is right or wrong in virtue
    of some general principle concerning kinds of
    actions
  • An action is ltright, wronggt if it is an action of
    kind K
  • But what is K???
  • A promise breaking? An act done with good
    intentions? An act that produces the greatest
    good for the greatest number? An act that does no
    harm?
  • An ethical relativist says that there is no way
    of filling in that Kno universal moral
    principles.

23
Ethical Universalism
  • To be a ethical universalist you only have to
    agree that there is some kind of action thats
    always right or always wrong.
  • The relevant kind may be something very general,
    for example, doing something that brings about
    the greatest good for the greatest number.

24
Is ethics a game without rules?
  • Reflective equilibrium theory construction in
    ethics is comparable to theory construction in
    science
  • We get dataour moral intuitions about real and
    imaginary cases
  • We generalize
  • We test our generalizations against further data
  • We keep going back and forth until we achieve a
    reflective equilibrium

25
A sample theory to test
The Wiccan Rede Harm none
26
The Wiccan Rede prohibits eating obliging
strangers
27
A case of easy rescue
What is harm? Failing to help in some cases
when we dont actually do harm can be wrong.
28
Setting a bad example
Even when an action doesnt directly harm anyone
it maystill make others worse off by setting a
bad example,establishing a bad precedent or
undermining institutionsthat are in the public
interest.
29
Contributing to harmful practices
Some kinds of actions that are harmless
individually are harmful when lots of people do
them
30
Another sample theory Utilitarianism
  • PU an act is right iff it maximizes utility
  • Utility is understood as desire-satisfaction,
    pleasure or happiness
  • Consider moral intuitions that support the theory
  • Consider those that are go against the theory
    (example the promise to the dead man problem)
  • What should we do if intuitions go against the
    theory
  • reject the intuitions and keep the theory?
  • reject the theory in favor on one that explains
    our intuitions?
  • modify the theory to accommodate our intuitions?

31
The Promise to the Dead Man Case
Promise that when Im dead youll give me decent
burial
32
Maximizing utility
The greatest goodfor the greatest number!
A good Utilitarian cuts up the body and uses it
as fish bait.
33
The Moral of this Story
  • Even if end we agree to disagree, we can reason
    about moral issues
  • Ethics is not a game without rules
  • It is not merely subjective
  • It is not just a matter of personal feelings
  • It is not something we have to take on faith

34
Cultural Relativism means different things
  • T 1. Peoples beliefs, attitudes, tastes, etc.
    are significantly affected by their culture--and
    people in different cultures have very different
    beliefs, attitudes, tastes, etc.
  • T 2. Methodological cultural relativism cultures
    should be studied on their own terms.
  • F 3. Actions are right or wrong to the extent and
    only to the extent that they conform or dont
    conform to cultural norms.

35
Cultural Relativism reflections
  • Actions that are wrong may be excusable and
    people that do them may not be blameworthy.
  • Even if an action is wrong, it doesnt follow
    that it would be right to stop people from doing
    it.
  • Practices that produce good results in one
    culture may not produce good results in another,
    e.g. polygamy.

36
Countries where polygamy is legal
37
(No Transcript)
38
Would legalizing polygamy maximize utility in the
US?
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
Asking these questions assumes a universal
standard!
  • An ethical universalist may consistently hold
    that polygamy is ok in one context but not ok in
    another
  • Because he may hold that what makes an action
    right is something that holds across all cultures
    . . .
  • But that whereas a given KIND of action has that
    right-making property on one context it doesnt
    have that property in another.

42
Human Rights the hard question
43
Different Questions
Is it wrong?
Can you blame them?
Should you stop them?
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Quine speaks
  • Truth, says the cultural relativist, is
    culture-bound. But if it were, then he, within
    his own culture, ought to see his own
    culture-bound truth as absolute. He cannot
    proclaim cultural relativism without rising above
    it, and he cannot riseabove it without giving it
    up.

48
Charles Napier on Sati
  • "Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom
    prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also
    a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them,
    and confiscate all their property. My carpenters
    shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang
    all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us
    all act according to national customs."

49
Problems with Cultural Relativism
  • Who is my neighbor? (The problem of overlapping
    cultures)
  • Some practices are just plain wrong
  • The paradox of tolerance

50
The Paradox of Tolerance
  • The ethical relativist cannot hold that everyone
    everywhere should be tolerant without
    contradicting himself!
  • If the ethical relativist holds that actions are
    right if they conform to cultural norms then he
    must hold that people in intolerant societies
    ought to be intolerant!

51
When in Romedo as the Romans do
52
The Moral of the Story
  • Relativism isnt as good as its cracked up to be
    a little learning is a dangerous thing
  • Some forms of relativism are logically
    problematic
  • We can accommodate our intuitions and commitments
    (about tolerance, about not being dogmatic, etc.)
    without buying into any form of relativism.

53
Dont wish for Ethical Relativism
The End
you might just get it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com