Dr Kevin Paterson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr Kevin Paterson

Description:

Visual Perception. Muller-Lyer illusion. Are lines in top image of same or different lengths? ... and on use of unnatural stimuli such as illusions. Visual Perception ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Preins8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr Kevin Paterson


1
  • Topics
  • Introducing the eye the visual system
  • Theories of visual perception
  • Using visual illusions to study vision.
  • Dr Kevin Paterson
  • k.b.paterson_at_derby.ac.uk
  • Essential reading
  • Eysenck, M. W., Keane M. T. (2001). Cognitive
    psychology. Psychology Press Hove, UK.

2
  • FUNCTION OF EYE
  • Light is reflected from surface of objects. It
    passes through pupil lens before landing on
    retina at the back of the eye.
  • The optic nerve passes neural data to the
    mid-brain. This passes information onto the
    visual cortex.
  • Visual data is processed at the retina, by areas
    of the mid-brain, and regions of the visual
    cortex.

3
  • BOTTOM-UP TOP-DOWN PROCESSES
  • Major debate is vision predominantly a bottom-up
    or top-down process?
  • Bottom-up perception (e.g. Marr, 1980) sensory
    information is processed in terms of basic
    features, features are combined to form objects,
    and objects are recognised. Perceiver
    reconstructs objects in world.
  • Top-down accounts (e.g. Gregory, 1970) perceiver
    uses knowledge and expectations to impose
    interpretation on incoming sensory data.
    Perceiver hypothesises about objects in world.

4
  • Visual illusions provide evidence for top-down
    processes in vision
  • In order to recognise the image, viewers do not
    just process feature information, but must
    interpret it.
  • What do you see when you look at the image on the
    right a young woman or an old one?

5
  • Visual illusions provide evidence for top-down
    processes in vision
  • Do you see top image as glass, or as two faces?
  • Note you can only see one version at a time.
    Reversals follow shift in attention.
  • Look at version below. Depending on what you read
    it is possible to bias your interpretation
    towards one of the possibilities.

6
  • Knowledge-based visual illusions
  • In top image girls appear to be different height
    - however, they are in fact the same height.
  • Ames room is constructed so that it looks like
    real room, but has different dimensions and
    shape.
  • From viewing point, distant people appear nearby.
    Knowledge about normal rooms influences
    perception.

7
  • Muller-Lyer illusion
  • Are lines in top image of same or different
    lengths? Most people say that right-hand line is
    longer.
  • Illusion may occur because of familiarity with
    vertices in buildings and other environments.
  • Knowledge that ? angle usually indicate distant
    edge and ? angle usually indicates nearby edge
    may influence our perception of length.
  • Again, evidence that knowledge influences
    perception?

8
  • Cues to distance
  • Ames room - dimensions shape of room provides
    cue to distance.
  • Muller-Lyer - knowledge about vertices provides
    cue to distance.
  • Interposition / occlusion - object in front is
    taken to be nearer.
  • Relative size - large objects are taken to be
    nearer.
  • Location in visual scene - objects high in scene
    are more distant.

9
  • Cues to distance
  • Texture gradients - Close objects have a coarse
    texture distant objects have a finer gradient.
    See how the shape of the cobbles disappears fade
    into the distance in this painting.
  • Convergence of parallel lines indicates
    increasing distance.

10
  • Cues to distance
  • Convergence in binocular vision (two-eye)
  • Eyes converge at same point of the visual scene.
  • Eyes turn in for close objects.
  • Eyes look straight ahead for distant objects.
  • Eyes serve as range finders.
  • Most important for perceiving distance of objects
    located near us

11
  • Can you identify the following cues to depth?

12
  • Constructivist theories of visual perception
    (e.g. Gregory, 1980) assumes that perception is
  • Active constructive meaning that perceiver
    determines nature of the visual image and is not
    a passive recipient of information.
  • Perception is influenced by top-down factors
  • expectations knowledge motivation factors
    emotional factors
  • However, demonstrations rely on errors (when most
    perception is correct?) and on use of unnatural
    stimuli such as illusions.

13
Marrs (1982) computational approach to vision
  • Vision is an information processing task in which
    retinal information is processed as low-level
    feature that are combined bottom-up to produce a
    representation of objects and scene.
  • First extract basic features from visual image
    and use these to determine edges of surfaces.
    Having identified edges, it is possible to
    separate objects and identify them.

14
Marrs (1982) computational approach to vision
  • Stages in processing of visual information
  • Processing is bottom-up

15
  • Direct perception (Gibson, 1979)
  • Ecological approach emphasises the importance of
    interaction of people and their environment.
  • Dynamic visual perception rather than perception
    of static images. Dismissed illusions as
    tricks.
  • Emphasises use of optic array, which is the flow
    of environment during movement.
  • Argues that objects provide affordances about
    meaning.

16
  • Direct perception of distance is afforded by
    motion parallax.
  • Motion parallax occurs during movement. More
    distant objects appear to be passed or move more
    slowly than near objects.

Compare near and distant objects next time you
travel by car or train.
17
  • Affordance refers to the actionable properties
    of objects.
  • According to Gibson, objects are directly
    perceived in terms of the actions they afford.
  • For instance, a door handle affords the action of
    opening.
  • Objects can be throwable, hittable, can be sat on.
  • Gibson argued that mailboxes directly afford the
    act of posting mail. Do you think this is true?

18
Comparing approaches to vision
  • Constructive approach
  • Emphasis on top-down processing, but does not
    demonstrate how these effects occur.
  • Emphasis on processing of static images.
  • Gibsons approach
  • Emphasis on processing of dynamic visual
    information.
  • Concepts vague at time.
  • Marrs approach
  • Detailed testable.
  • Consistent with physiological knowledge.
  • Emphasis on bottom-up processes.
  • However, emphasis on processing of static images.
  • What happens when we view dynamic visual scenes?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com