Report Tile - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Report Tile

Description:

US Postal Service (Estimate) 1,046. 541. 23. 30. 257. 195. Other Civilian ... For non-US Postal Service employees. Freeze COLA rates as of date of enactment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: joerat
Category:
Tags: postal | report | service | tile | us

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Report Tile


1
Report Tile
Non-Foreign Area Cost of Living Allowance (COLA)
Transformation
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
2
How Are COLA and Locality Pay Different?
  • Cost-of-Living Allowance (COLA) compensates
    Federal employees for differences in prices of
    goods and services in each COLA area compared to
    Washington, DC
  • Locality pay compensates Federal employees for
    the differences in the cost of labor in each
    locality pay area compared to the General Schedule

3
COLA Overview
  • Enacted in 1948
  • Paid to about 49,000 Federal white-collar and
    U.S. Postal Service employees
  • About 40 percent are in Hawaii
  • Compares living costs between Washington, DC, and
    each COLA area
  • Cannot exceed 25 percent
  • Can go up or down
  • Not subject to Federal income tax
  • Not creditable for retirement

4
Recent Developments
  • COLA rates have been reduced by one point in
  • Anchorage
  • Juneau
  • Fairbanks
  • Puerto Rico
  • Proposed rule would reduce Alaska rates another
    point
  • Maui and Kauai have reached the statutory limit
    of 25
  • Big Island rate proposed to increase one point to
    18
  • Pacific areas surveyed in March, 2007
  • Caribbean areas to be surveyed in March this year

5
COLA Areas and Rates
Area Rate Index Anchorage, AK (Proposed
23) 24.0 10.0 Fairbanks, AK (Proposed
23) 24.0 19.0 Juneau, AK (Proposed
23) 24.0 20.0 Rest of Alaska 25.0 33.0
City and County of Honolulu, HI 25.0 27.0 Maui
County, HI 25.0 33.0 Kauai County,
HI 25.0 29.0 Hawaii County, HI (Proposed
18) 17.0 18.0 Guam/Northern Mariana
Islands 25.0 29.0 U.S. Virgin
Islands 25.0 38.0 Puerto Rico (Proposed
13) 10.5 13.0 Effective January, 2008
6
COLA Employment
7
COLA Affects Retirement, Pay
  • Retirement benefits for COLA recipients are lower
    than for locality pay recipients
  • COLA is not creditable for retirement locality
    pay is
  • Disparity raises equity concerns, especially for
    employees near retirement, and may cause staffing
    problems
  • COLA is capped at 25, locality pay is not capped
  • Base pay in COLA areas is not keeping pace with
    base pay in locality pay areas, therefore
  • Overtime rates are lower
  • Premium pay rates are lower
  • Life insurance amounts are lower

8
Why Change Now?
  • Administration desires a more uniform approach
    and simplified pay structure for Federal
    employees
  • Administration wants equity in pension benefits
  • Current law results in minimal increases, or even
    decreases, in pay and allowances in non-foreign
    areas although labor costs increase annually
  • Cost of past, present, and future litigation
  • Improve recruitment and retention of employees in
    non-foreign areas

9
Key Elements of Proposal
  • Discontinue COLA surveys
  • For non-US Postal Service employees
  • Freeze COLA rates as of date of enactment
  • Extend locality pay to nonforeign areas
  • Offset COLA rates by 85 of locality pay
    percentage to reduce impact on take home pay
  • Abolish COLA payments once rates reach zero
  • For most US Postal Service employees, freeze COLA
    rates as of date of enactment

10
Key Elements (continued)
  • Proposal provides seven year locality pay
    phase-in
  • In first year, extend locality pay to all areas
    based on RUS rate (currently 13.18) to give
    Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Salary
    Council, and Presidents Pay Agent time to
    properly implement new locality pay areas
  • Extend locality pay to all nonforeign areas,
    including areas where a post differential is
    authorized, like American Samoa

11
Expected Impact of Proposal
  • Assuming Federal Salary Council, Pay Agent
    Action
  • Alaska and Hawaii areas are likely to become
    individual locality pay areas
  • All other non-foreign COLA areas are likely to be
    in the Rest of U.S. pay area
  • How soon locality pay would overtake COLA would
    vary by COLA area but could take 10 to 30 years
    depending on area

12
How Does This Affect Me?
  • With locality pay, retirement pay increases two
    ways
  • Annuity increases by locality pay in your high-3
  • TSP increases by Government, employee
    contribution
  • What does this cost
  • You would pay same percentage on locality pay
    that you pay on your base pay for retirement,
    social security contributions
  • You would pay Federal income tax on locality pay,
    just like on your base pay, but proposed offset
    mitigates tax

13
How Does This Affect Me? (continued)
  • What is the payback period?
  • Varies, depending on years of service, salary
    history
  • For 20 year CSRS employee, first 24 to 30 months
    of annuity approximates employee contributions
  • For 20 year FERS employee, first 6 to 8 months of
    annuity approximates employee contributions
  • Most employees working now in COLA areas would
    not make retirement contributions on locality pay
    as long as on their base salaries, so the payback
    for contributions made on locality pay would be
    faster

14
How Will It Work?
The chart below shows what happens in year one
15
How Will It Work? (continued)
  • Lets go to year seven
  • Your 100 is now 119 after seven years of 2.5
    increases
  • Assume locality pay starts at 20 and increases
    0.5 per year
  • After seven years, locality pay is 23, COLA is
    5.45
  • Your high-3 has been increased by 19.3, which
    means each and every annuity payment would be
    19.3 higher than it would have been

16
Summary
  • The proposal would
  • Phase out COLA in favor of more market-sensitive
    compensation
  • Protect employee take-home pay in all non-foreign
    COLA areas, including pay of USPS employees
  • Provide greater retirement benefits for non-USPS
    employees
  • Prevent further COLA rate reductions
  • Result in higher pay potential for employees
  • Provide equity in retirement benefits for
    employees in the nonforeign areas

17
Questions?
18
How Is Locality Pay Figured?
  • BLS surveys random sample of private, State/local
    establishments
  • Randomly samples up to 8 establishment jobs
    depending on establishment size
  • Matches each sampled job to Standard Occupational
    Classification (SOC) System job, GS grade level
  • Models missing data using linear regression
    techniques
  • Weights data within PATCO categories and grade by
    GS employment in each SOC job, computes
    category/grade averages, and sends information to
    OPM
  • OPM compares survey data to pay rates under base
    General Schedule, computes locality area pay gaps
  • Honolulus gap 41.72 (http//www.opm.gov/oca/fs
    c/recommendation07.pdf)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com