Title: Risk Assessment
1Risk Assessment Risk Management
2Risk Assessment
US Airways Magazine, October 1991
3Risk Management
US Airways Magazine, October 1991
4Risk Assessment/Risk Management
- Risk Identification
- Adverse events?
- Risk Estimation
- Probability of adverse event?
- Risk Management
- Control measures?
5Risk (Definitions)
- Possibility of loss, injury, disease, or death.
Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary (1986) - The probability that exposure to a hazard will
lead to a negative consequence. David Ropeik,
George Gray (2002) - To risk living is to risk dying. Anonymous
6Risk Assessment
- The emergent science based on toxicology,
epidemiology and statistics that utilizes
qualitative and quantitative hazard analysis to
provide the public with a reasonable estimate of
probability of harm. - Not a scalpel, but a crude tool that allows you
to make estimates. Peter Preuss, US EPA
7Risk Assessment
- Difficult process
(expertise of many fields needed) - Involves uncertainty
- Range provided (not a specific number)
- Estimates for society (individual risk may vary)
- Reasonable worst-case estimate (better to
overestimate than underestimate risk) - Costs and benefits of proposed actions helpful
84 Steps in Risk Assessment (Jeff Wheelwright,
1996)
- 1) Identify health hazard
- 2) Quantify hazard
- 3) Exposure assessment (from source to at risk
person) - 4) Determine probability of disease (based on
exposure estimate and potency of agent)
9Biohazard Epidemiology
- Incidence of Hepatitis among Danish clinical
chemistry workers 7X higher than general
population (Skinholj, 1974) - Risk of acquiring TB 5X greater among medical lab
workers in England than general population
(Harrington Shannon, 1976)
10Hierarchy of Controls
- Anticipation
- Recognition
- Evaluation
- Control
- substitution
- administrative
- engineering
- work practices
- personal protective clothing
- facility features
11Biohazard Risk Assessment
- Qualitative exercise
(inexact) - General guidelines
to assess/control risk - agent in use, volumes, concentration
- proposed practices/procedures
- proposed location
- training, experience, health status of worker
12Biohazard Risk Assessment
- Use to determine appropriate combination of
containment - lab practices
- safety equipment
- facility design
- Primary Containment
- protects handlers and those in immediate vicinity
- Secondary Containment
- protects environment and those outside the lab
13Biohazard Risk Assessment Pathway
- Principal Investigator (initiates risk review)
- Biosafety Officer (assists PI)
- Institutional Biosafety Committee (must review
and approve PIs submission) - Assistance through
- published listings, guidelines (U.S. and abroad)
- other experts at host institution, local public
health - other institutions working with same agents
- Government entities (CDC, NIH, USDA, FDA, etc.)
14Risk Assessment Pathway
- Principal Investigator initiates process
- Qualitative process
- Agent
- Virulence, pathogenicity, communicability,
environmental stability, dose, route of exposure,
availability of therapy - Use Risk Group Lists
- Consider proposed procedures
- Operations, quantity (volume/concentration),
generation of aerosols, sharps, animals
15(No Transcript)
16Routes of Exposure to Infectious Agents
- Inhalation of aerosols
- Through intact or non-intact skin (needlestick,
injury (broken glass), animal bites or scratches,
vector (mosquito, tick, parasite), eczema,
dermatitis - Mucous membranes of eyes, nose or mouth
- Ingestion (mouth pipetting)
- Contact (indirect transfer from hands or
contaminated surfaces)
17Infectious Agents are Classified by Level of
Hazard
- 4 Agent Risk Group Classifications
- RG1 RG2 RG3 RG4
Moderate individual risk
Low individual risk
High individual risk
High risk to community
No risk to community
Low risk to community
18Risk Groups (RG)
- RG1
- Not infectious to healthy adults
- e.g. E. coli K12 strains, B. subtilis, S.
cerevisiae - RG2
- Infectious agents of varying severity, treatment
usually available, predominantly bloodborne,
ingestion, and mucous membrane routes of exposure - e.g. Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Plasmodium,
Hepatitis B Virus, Cryptococcus neoformans - Both RG1/RG2 can be used in a basic lab
- containment equipment to contain aerosols
19Risk Groups (RG)
- RG3
- potential to cause serious or lethal disease,
airborne route of exposure (and others),
treatment generally not available, lower
infectious dose. - Containment Lab 2 doors off general corridor,
dedicated air handler, controlled airflow, all
work contained - e.g. TB, Vesicular Stomatitis Virus, Yellow Fever
Virus, Coxiella burneti, Francisella tularensis
20Risk Groups (RG)
- RG4
- Dangerous, exotic agents with high risk to
individual and community. Aerosol transmission
along with all other routes. Very low infectious
dose, high mortality rates. - Building within building approach for research
purposes. - e.g. Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Junin, Lassa,
Machupo, Sabia, Equine Morbillivirus (Hendra-like
viruses), Tick-Borne Encephalitis Viruses
21Risk Assessment Pathway
- Principal Investigator responsible for completing
initial risk assessment - Start with risk group for parent organism
- Consider the proposed procedures
- Identify Risk Management Procedures
- Facility design elements
- Safety or containment equipment
- Work practices
22 Laboratory Safety
Containment Levels
- 4 Laboratory Biosafety Levels
- BSL1 BSL2 BSL3 BSL4
Basic laboratory, confine aerosols in biosafety
cabinet if needed
Containment lab, 2 door separation from general
traffic, negative air flow, alarms
Maximum containment lab, building w/in building,
all features isolated, pos. pressure suits, glove
box type isolation
23Hybrid Biosafety Level
- BSL2/BSL3 (BL2)
- Creutzfeld Jacob
- HIV
- High risk clinical specimens
- BSL3-Enhanced (HEPA filtered exhaust Lab)
- Yellow Fever, Rift Valley Fever Virus, VEE
- Rickettsia rickettsii
24Unknown Specimens
- Facility Evaluation (highest level of protection
available) - B.A.R.E
- Block All Routes
of Exposure
25Containment achieved with
- Good microbiological practices
- Safety Equipment
- Facility Design
26Risk Assessment Pathway
- Institutional Biosafety Committee verifies and
approves PI Risk Assessment - Review of written risk assessment
- Verification of personnel training and experience
- Biosafety courses
- Hands-on experience/proficiency
- Safety record
- Inspection of facility and work practices
- Formal approval of protocol
27Find Assigned Risk Group for
- Brucella canis
- Chlamydia trachomatis
- diagnostic work
- high concentrations
- Francisella tularensis
- diagnostic/clinical work
- cell culture experiments
- Coccidioides immitis
- clinical specimens
- cultures
- Prions
- human prions
- animal prions
- Rabies virus
- HIV/SIV
- research scale
- Vesicular Stomatitis virus
- lab adapted strains
- Isolates from livestock
- rDNA, Insertion of oncogene into human cells
- Vesicular Stomatitis virus-NJ with HIV gp 120
- Botulinum toxin
28Risk Assessment Risk Management
- Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance
29Risk Assessment Risk Management
- Pathogen (Agent)
- Procedures (Protocol)
- Personnel
- Protective Equipment
- Place (Proposed lab facility)
30P-1 Pathogen
- Should this agent be used in this experiment? On
this campus? - Note concentration or amplification in lab may
present greater hazard than in nature.
31PATHOGEN
- Agent Classification (Prior LAIs)
- Source of agent
- Routes of Exposure
- Infectious Dose (LD50s for toxins)
- Pathogenicity
- Virulence
- Antibiotic resistance
32Infectious Dose
- Agent
- Ebola virus
- TB
- Tularemia
- Anthrax
- Cholera
- Salmonella typhi
- E. coli
- Shigella
- Dose
- 1
- 1 - 10
- 10
- gt1300?????
- 108
- 105
- 108
- 109
33PATHOGEN
- Quantity/Concentration
- Incidence in the Community
- Immunization/Treatment
- Communicability
- Presence of Vectors
- Environmental Concerns (stability)
- Data from animal experiments
- Clinical specimens
34Immunizations
- Vaccinia
- Tetanus
- Meningococcal Immunization
- Typhoid
- Botulinum
- Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis A virus
- Yellow Fever, EEE
- Rabies
35rDNA Molecules
- Classification of parent agent
- Toxins
- Antibiotic resistance genes
- Altered host range or tropism
- Replication competency
- Integration into host genome
- Toxicity, allergenicity, other
36P-2 Personnel
- Are the proposed researchers capable of safely
conducting these experiments?
37 PERSONNEL
- Host Immunity
- neoplastic disease/infectionimmunosuppressive
therapyage, race, sex, pregnancysurgery
(splenectomy, gastrectomy)diabetes, lupus - Reproductive age
- Contraindications for therapy
38PERSONNEL
- Medical Surveillance
- prophylactic immunizations
- serum storage
- post-exposure prophylaxis/treatment
- screening
39PERSONNEL
- aware of hazards
- prior documented work experience
- microbiological proficiency (observed)
- comfort/choice
40PERSONNEL
- Safety Attitude
- Those who have fewer accidents adhere to safety
regulations respect infectious agents defensive
work habits able to recognize potential hazards - Women
- Older employees (age 45-64)
41PERSONNEL
- Safety Attitude
- Those who have more accidents low opinion of
safety take excessive risks work too fast less
aware of risks - Men
- Younger employees (age 17-24)
42P-3 Protective Equipment
- Has the Principal Investigator selected the
appropriate combination of personal protective
clothing and safety equipment for the safe
conduct of research?
43Protective Equipment
- Personal Protective Equipment (clothing)
- Containment Equipment
- Biological safety cabinets
- Safety centrifuges
- Sealed sonicators, blenders, homogenizers
- Sealed tubes, transport carriers
- Safe sharps, needleboxes, medical waste bags,
tongs, forceps, etc.
44PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
- Protect skin clothing mucous
membranes respiratory system - Use gloves (double, kevlar) lab coats,
solid-front gowns sleeve covers full face
protection respiratory protection
45PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
- Disposable
- Decontamination
- Dedicated to area
- Donning/Doffing
- Compromised (wet/contaminated/torn)
- Respiratory Protection Program
46P-4 Place (Facility Design)
- Does this research group have (or have access to)
a laboratory with the requisite containment
features this work?
47PLACE FACILITY DESIGN
- Restricted access/Door sign
- Easily cleanable
- Hand washing sinks (near exit door)
- Eye wash
- Autoclave
- Vacuum system protection
- Biosafety Cabinet
48PLACE FACILITY DESIGN
- Anteroom
- Negative pressure gradient
- Airflow monitor
- Air changes per hour (10-15)
- Sealed penetrations, coved flooring
- Facility alarms/interlocks
- Communication outside the lab
49P-5 Procedures
- Has the Principal Investigator outlined all of
the proposed steps in the protocol? - Has the lab outlined sufficient protective work
practices to minimize the risk to those working
and those outside the lab?
50PROCEDURES
- Develop standard written practices (SOPs) for
handling pathogens - Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
- identify each task
- describe all steps
- hazard assessment at each step
- incorporate safety
- Focus on containing aerosol generating procedures
and equipment
51Aerosols
- Procedures that impart energy into a microbial
suspension are a potential source of aerosol
(Chatigny, 1974) - Many common lab procedures and accidents have
capability of releasing aerosols - homogenization, sonication, blending, mixing,
grinding, shaking, vortexing, spills, opening
vials, pipetting, animals excreting agent,
opening vials under pressure, etc.
52Viable Particles Recovered from Air (Chatigny,
1974)
- Procedure
- sonic oscillator
- mixing w/ pipette
- overflow from mixer
- opening lyophilized vial
- top removed after blending
- dropping flask of culture
- dropping lyophilized culture
- Particles/ft3 of air
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 135
- 1500
- 1551
- 4839
53Procedures - Sharps Hazards
- Syringe/Needle
- adjusting volume
- withdrawal from stopper
- separation from syringe
- leaking syringe
- leakage from injection site
- inappropriate disposal
- poor work practices
54Procedures - Sharps Precautions
- Syringe/Needle
- use needle-locking syringes
- cover with disinfectant soaked gauze
- animal restraints
- cleanse inoculation site
- safe needle practices
- immediate collection/disposal
55Procedures - Sharps Precautions
- Needle/syringe
- removal of needle from syringe (hemostat)
- no recapping, bending, breaking, etc.
- immediate disposal of intact needle/syringe
- location of needlebox (vicinity, height)
- replacement of needleboxes
- eliminate/minimize use/safe sharp devices
- avoid glass Pasteur pipettes
56Procedures presenting risk
- Microbiological loop
- streaking plates
- spreading material on slides
- cooling loop in media
- heating loop in an open flame
57Precautions in bacteriology
- Microbiological loop
- smooth plates
- disposable plastic loops
- well formed loops with short staff
- glass spreaders
- electric (walled) micro-incinerators
- work within a biosafety cabinet
58Procedures with general risk
- Pipetting
- mouth pipetting
- glass Pasteur pipettes
- blow-out pipettes
- mixing suspensions
- spill of droplets onto hard surfaces
- Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics
59PROCEDURES
- Pipetting
- no mouth pipetting
- disposable plastic pipettes
- mark to mark pipettes
- collect within biosafety cabinet
- work over disinfectant-wet pad
- Restrict consumption of food or beverage to well
defined break areas
60PROCEDURES
- Centrifugation
- broken/leaking tubes
- microfuge tubes (snap caps)
- (flawed/overfilled)
- Protective Measures
- check O-rings on rotors (use O-ring tubes)
- safety cups/sealed rotors
- load/unload in a biosafety cabinet
61Risk Assessment Example
- Hantavirus Protocol
- Application of 5 Ps
- Hierarchy of controls
- Pathogen
- Personnel
- Place
- Procedures
- Protective Equipment