Digital Images as Evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Digital Images as Evidence

Description:

It shows a tattoo of a rose on William's arm. ... When asked if he knew if the spot was grease, dirt, or a tattoo, he answers that he does not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: karlh9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Digital Images as Evidence


1
Digital Images as Evidence
  • Karl Harris
  • Computer Science 99
  • Dartmouth College
  • February 29, 2000

2
Introduction
  • Digital Image Enhancement is a process in which a
    digital image is enhanced so that more detail can
    be seen
  • This process has many applications
  • Entertainment such as movies and art
  • Law Enforcement
  • It is such a new technology that the legal system
    is struggling with how digitally enhanced images
    can be used as evidence

3
Topics of Discussion
  • The Reginald Denny beating and trial
  • Cognitech, Inc.,and the future of digital image
    enhancement
  • Ethical and legal ramifications of this technology

4
The Reginald Denny Case
  • On April 29, 1992, trucker Reginald Denny is
    severely beaten as he leaves his truck to help
    other victims during the LA Riots
  • Damian Williams and Henry Watson are charged with
    attempted murder
  • Because there are no clear photos and few
    witnesses, digital image enhancement is used by
    Cognitech to identify Williams as an assailant in
    the trial.

5
The Sequence of Events
  • Sept. 11, 1993
  • An enhanced image showing a cheek blemish and a
    stain on a T-shirt links Williams with a liquor
    store robbery and the beating
  • Sept. 15, 1993
  • Cognitech enhances an image taken from a
    helicopter showing the beating. It shows a
    tattoo of a rose on Williams arm.
  • The jurors are allowed to see enlarged photos of
    the beating, but not the enhanced images

6
The Sequence of Events
  • Sept. 16, 1993
  • Judge Ouderkirk rules that Cognitechs process to
    enhance the video is reliable enough to be used
    as evidence
  • Leonid Rudin, director of Cognitech, testifies
    that there is definitely something on the man in
    the photos arm and that it is consistent with
    Williams tattoo
  • When asked if he knew if the spot was grease,
    dirt, or a tattoo, he answers that he does not

7
Cognitech and the Future
  • After the Denny Case, Cognitechs top executives
    believed there could be a multi-billion dollar
    business in image enhancement for law enforcement
  • There are many applications
  • Video surveillance in convenience stores, parking
    garages, and ATM machines
  • Insurance claims
  • Acquittals

8
What is the Law?
  • An original of a writing or recording is the
    writing or recording itself or any counterpart
    intended to have the same effect by a person
    executing or issuing it. An original of a
    photograph includes the negative or any print
    therefrom. If data are stored in a computer or
    similar device, any printout or other output
    readable by sight, shown to reflect the data
    accurately, is an original - Federal Rules of
    Evidence

9
Ethical and Legal Implications
  • Digitex - digital, editing, and special effects
    used to manipulate images
  • With digitex, even experts will be unable to
    determine if images have been altered
  • Judges - exclude all photographic evidence?
  • New ethical situations
  • Wrongful convictions or acquittals due to
    mistakes in the image enhancement
  • To what extreme do we go?

10
What can be done?
  • Keep the source media intact showing the original
    directory with dates, files, sizes, and names
    generated by the camera
  • Find better ways of analyzing digital images to
    detect tampering
  • Make better and newer laws. Without a clear
    legal precedence the is no framework to start
    from.

11
Summary
  • The Reginald Denny case brings into question the
    use of digitally enhanced images as evidence in
    court
  • The Federal Rules of Evidence say a digital
    image, enhanced or not, is just as good as a
    photograph from film
  • There are many dangers associated with admitting
    digital images as evidence in a trial
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com