Galactic and Extragalactic star formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Galactic and Extragalactic star formation

Description:

That there is a connection is clear from the various correlations found between star ... Stars form in spiral arms. M33 Spitzer Image. From Verley et al. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: malcolmw8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Galactic and Extragalactic star formation


1
Galactic and Extragalactic star formation
  • M.Walmsley (Arcetri Observatory)

2
Simplified View of Extragalactic Star Formation
  • Based upon
  • Assuming local IMF is valid
  • everywhere
  • Assuming for the SF efficiency some
  • version of the Schmidt Law

AMAZING IF TRUE !
3
What does galactic star formation tell us?
  • Star formation occurs in molecular clouds
  • More precisely, it occurs within the dense parts
    of molecular clouds

This raises the question of whether star
formation occurs because the gas is dense or
because it is molecular or both
4
(No Transcript)
5
Galactic Extragalactic connection
  • That there is a connection is clear from the
    various correlations found between star
  • formation and molecular line luminosity (most
    recently from Wu et al)
  • The HCN luminosity tracks the IR luminosity
    with the same relationship for galactic and
    extragalactic SFR

6
HCN luminosity
  • In galactic clouds, L(HCN) is thought to
    be
  • roughly given by
  • L(HCN) ?Cex n(H2) n(HCN) dV
  • This involves the HCN abundance and hence the
    Wu et al. result suggests similar chemistry in
    the extragalactic clouds as in galactic.

So the Wu et al. result seems to imply that
extragalactic starbursts are similar to galactic
starbursts but much larger
7
Do abundances differ in galactic and
extragalactic clouds?
  • Yes ! But there are some rough correspondences as
    one sees comparing NGC253 to galactic clouds
    (S.Martin et al.)

8
Simplified view of IMF
  • Field Star IMF is within errors same as that
    inferred for ONC (Orion Nebula Cluster) and other
    nearby star forming regions
  • It has a power law (Salpeter) down to about 0.5-1
    M(Sun) with most mass in solar mass stars but
    most luminosity at high M
  • Evidence for deviations from standard IMF in some
    Gal. Center clusters

9
One possible explanation of the IMF
  • It reflects the mass distribution of the cloud
    fragments or cores in the molecular cloud
  • The typical mass of around 1 MO then reflects
    the Jeans Mass (very T dependent)

M(JEANS) T3/2 n-1/2
10
The origin of the Initial Mass Function
Submm continuum surveys of nearby protoclusters
suggest that the mass distribution of
pre-stellar condensations mimics the form of the
stellar IMF
Condensations mass spectrum in r Oph
NGC2068 protocluster at 850 mm
(see also Testi Sargent 1998 Motte et al.
2001)
Motte et al. 2001
  • The IMF is at least partly determined by
    fragmentation at the pre-stellar stage.

11
Consequences for extragalactic SF
  • If fragmentation is fundamental in determining
    the IMF, the Jeans Mass and hence the temperature
    may determine the critical turn-over mass
  • This could cause the IMF in galactic nuclei to be
    more biased towards high mass ???
  • Temperatures in Galactic Center clouds are high

12
The Schmidt Law
  • The Schmidt Law for the star formation rate (SFR)
    has many forms

SFR d?/dt ?p with p1-2
Alternatively
d?/dt ?/t(SF)
Where ? is col.density and t(SF) is timescale for
star formation
13
Galactic timescale for Star Formation tSF
  • One might naturally think it was the free-fall
    time at the mean density of molecular clouds
  • But as pointed out in the 70s by Zuckerman and
    Evans, real galactic SF Rate is lower (tSF109
    yr) than from free fall time (tff roughly 106
    years)
  • This has given rise to two classes of theories
  • slow including ambipolar diffusion modulated
    theories.
  • inefficient turbulence, HII regions and winds

14
Star Form. Rate in Galactic Dense Clumps
  • From Plume et al (1997) the SF rate in galactic
    clouds corresponds to a timescale of 107 to 108
    years - but tff is 105 yr

tff/tSF as in GMCs
15
But it cannot be too inefficient
  • Some cluster masses are 10 percent of maximum GMC
    masses (Blitz et al., Clark)

16
Both slow and ineffcient SF may be needed
  • Maybe better to write the Schmidt law

d?/dt ??/ tSF where tSF ß tff
?/? 0.01
17
Conclusions
  • Extragalactic star formation may well be just
    galactic writ large
  • But we do not understand what determines the
    efficiencies and timescales
  • Of course the IMF might be playing tricks

18
Stars form in spiral arms
M33 Spitzer Image From Verley et al.
19
What theory can say about Schmidt Laws
  • Mainly that Nature can conspire to make t(SF)
    equal to orbital time scale
  • (Tan, McKee and others)
  • For example cloud collision rate depends on
    shear which in turn depends on orbital parameters
    ??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com