Title: Galactic and Extragalactic star formation
1Galactic and Extragalactic star formation
- M.Walmsley (Arcetri Observatory)
2Simplified View of Extragalactic Star Formation
- Based upon
- Assuming local IMF is valid
- everywhere
- Assuming for the SF efficiency some
- version of the Schmidt Law
AMAZING IF TRUE !
3What does galactic star formation tell us?
- Star formation occurs in molecular clouds
- More precisely, it occurs within the dense parts
of molecular clouds
This raises the question of whether star
formation occurs because the gas is dense or
because it is molecular or both
4(No Transcript)
5Galactic Extragalactic connection
- That there is a connection is clear from the
various correlations found between star - formation and molecular line luminosity (most
recently from Wu et al) - The HCN luminosity tracks the IR luminosity
with the same relationship for galactic and
extragalactic SFR
6HCN luminosity
- In galactic clouds, L(HCN) is thought to
be - roughly given by
- L(HCN) ?Cex n(H2) n(HCN) dV
- This involves the HCN abundance and hence the
Wu et al. result suggests similar chemistry in
the extragalactic clouds as in galactic.
So the Wu et al. result seems to imply that
extragalactic starbursts are similar to galactic
starbursts but much larger
7Do abundances differ in galactic and
extragalactic clouds?
- Yes ! But there are some rough correspondences as
one sees comparing NGC253 to galactic clouds
(S.Martin et al.)
8Simplified view of IMF
- Field Star IMF is within errors same as that
inferred for ONC (Orion Nebula Cluster) and other
nearby star forming regions - It has a power law (Salpeter) down to about 0.5-1
M(Sun) with most mass in solar mass stars but
most luminosity at high M - Evidence for deviations from standard IMF in some
Gal. Center clusters
9One possible explanation of the IMF
- It reflects the mass distribution of the cloud
fragments or cores in the molecular cloud - The typical mass of around 1 MO then reflects
the Jeans Mass (very T dependent)
M(JEANS) T3/2 n-1/2
10 The origin of the Initial Mass Function
Submm continuum surveys of nearby protoclusters
suggest that the mass distribution of
pre-stellar condensations mimics the form of the
stellar IMF
Condensations mass spectrum in r Oph
NGC2068 protocluster at 850 mm
(see also Testi Sargent 1998 Motte et al.
2001)
Motte et al. 2001
- The IMF is at least partly determined by
fragmentation at the pre-stellar stage.
11Consequences for extragalactic SF
- If fragmentation is fundamental in determining
the IMF, the Jeans Mass and hence the temperature
may determine the critical turn-over mass - This could cause the IMF in galactic nuclei to be
more biased towards high mass ??? - Temperatures in Galactic Center clouds are high
12The Schmidt Law
- The Schmidt Law for the star formation rate (SFR)
has many forms
SFR d?/dt ?p with p1-2
Alternatively
d?/dt ?/t(SF)
Where ? is col.density and t(SF) is timescale for
star formation
13Galactic timescale for Star Formation tSF
- One might naturally think it was the free-fall
time at the mean density of molecular clouds - But as pointed out in the 70s by Zuckerman and
Evans, real galactic SF Rate is lower (tSF109
yr) than from free fall time (tff roughly 106
years) - This has given rise to two classes of theories
- slow including ambipolar diffusion modulated
theories. - inefficient turbulence, HII regions and winds
14Star Form. Rate in Galactic Dense Clumps
- From Plume et al (1997) the SF rate in galactic
clouds corresponds to a timescale of 107 to 108
years - but tff is 105 yr
tff/tSF as in GMCs
15But it cannot be too inefficient
- Some cluster masses are 10 percent of maximum GMC
masses (Blitz et al., Clark)
16Both slow and ineffcient SF may be needed
- Maybe better to write the Schmidt law
d?/dt ??/ tSF where tSF ß tff
?/? 0.01
17Conclusions
- Extragalactic star formation may well be just
galactic writ large - But we do not understand what determines the
efficiencies and timescales - Of course the IMF might be playing tricks
18Stars form in spiral arms
M33 Spitzer Image From Verley et al.
19What theory can say about Schmidt Laws
- Mainly that Nature can conspire to make t(SF)
equal to orbital time scale - (Tan, McKee and others)
- For example cloud collision rate depends on
shear which in turn depends on orbital parameters
??