Title: Regional Analysis
1Regional Planning in Southwest Minnesota
- Cameron Macht
- Regional Analyst, Southwest MN
- Dept. of Employment and Economic Development
- www.deed.state.mn.us/lmi/
- 320-231-5174 ext. 7535
- cameron.macht_at_state.mn.us
2Presentation Agenda
- Regional profiling in Southwest MN
- Changing Demographics
- Changing Labor Force
- Changing Economy
- Conclusions and Questions
3Why Does Regional Matter?
- Despite the intricacies of each countys
workforce and economy, there are more
similarities than differences - We are in a global competition for good jobs and
good workers including our own youth! - Businesses and people make decisions on where to
locate based on the image and reputationof the
region - Southwest Minnesota is at a turning point
- Competing on low-cost, low-wage production
- Rural areas, but also other countries
- Competing on high skills that can support higher
wages
4Opportunities For Success
- There is no guarantee that Southwest Minnesota
will be a region in which advanced manufacturing
or other high-skilled industries can compete and
survive - This report presents a baseline of information
about where the region stands today - There are strengths and weaknesses
- The challenge for Southwest Minnesota isto fully
embrace the notion of becoming aregion that is
focused on growingemployment in high-skill
industries - That change will require strategic thinking,
commitment, and effective leadership
5There Are No Easy Answers
- Regions and economies are giant, complex
organisms that change slowly in some ways and
quickly in others - No single idea or answer is going to solve every
problem or maximize every strength - Everyone should feel open and welcome to provide
ideas, comments, and feedback at any time - Everyone needs to be able to say whatever they
want to say whenever they want to say it. - This meeting is for brainstorming and creating
ideas the next meeting will focus on
formulating action plans and building work
groups/industry forums
6Population is Declining
- Region 6W has seen a steady decline -27.6
decrease in population since 1960 - -1.6 decrease from 1990 to 2000
- -2.7 from 2000 to 2003 (-1,350)
- Region 8 has seen a steady decline -18.5
decrease in population since 1960 - -1.3 decrease from 1990 to 2000
- -2.0 from 2000 to 2003 (-2,422)
- Central Minnesota more than doubled (114.5
increase) - Region 6E increased 20.1
- State of Minnesota increased 48.2 from 1960 to
2003
2003
2003
7Percent Population Change, 1990 to 2000
- Slow but steady decline
- Only Lyon (2.6) Nobles (3.7) Swift (11.5)
grew from 1990-2000 - Big Stone -7.4
- Chippewa -1.1
- Cottonwood -4.2
- Jackson -3.5
- Lac qui Parle -9.6
- Lincoln -6.7
- Murray -5.1
- Pipestone -5.7
- Redwood -2.5
- Rock -0.9
- Yellow Medicine -5.2
- ZERO Southwest counties grew from 2000 to 2003
Source 1990 2000 Census
8Moving From Rural to Urban
- Nationwide trend U.S. population was 75 urban
in 1990 it jumped to 79 urban in 2000 - Statewide trend MN population was 69.8 urban in
1990 it crept up to 70.9 urban in 2000
9Negative Rate of Natural Increase
- In 11 of the 14 counties, there were more deaths
than births - Only Lyon, Nobles, and Chippewa County had more
births than deaths - Big Stone, Lac qui Parle, Cottonwood, Lincoln,
and Murray had the largest natural rate deficits
(-5 through -9) - Southwest Minnesota has a natural rate of
decrease of -1 percent - The state of Minnesota has a natural rate of
increase of 6 percent
10(No Transcript)
11Percentage of the Population Age 65 and Over
- Ahead of our time . . .
- By 2030, 20 of the MN population is projected to
be aged 65 years over - Minnesota 12.1
- In 2000, 20 of the Southwest MN pop. already
was - By 2030, 30 of the Southwest MN pop. is
projected to be aged 65 years over
Source 2000 Census
12So the Population is Growing Older
- Region 6W is already there 20.7 were 65 years
and over in 2000 projected to reach 30.2 by
2030 almost 1 in every 3 people! - Region 8 was 19.1 in 2000 projected to reach
26.3 in 2030 - Region 6E was 15.6 in 2000 projected to reach
24.4 in 2030
Baby Boomers begin reaching retirement age in
2011
Source Minnesota Planning
13Pop. Increases
- Southwest Minnesota can expect a marginal 2.3
pop. increase from 2000 to 2030 - Not due to births or in-migration
- Due to longer life expectancies
- Only one age group (25-29) under the age of 55
will grow - 35-49 sees the biggest declines
- 0-19 sees corresponding losses
- Every age group from 55 years on will grow
rapidly - 65-79 sees the biggest growth
- However, this assumes that retirees will remain
in the region
14Migration Patterns Losing Our Youth?
Net Migration, Age 30 to 44
Net Migration, Age 15 to 24
Source 1990 2000 Census
15Minority Populations, 2000
Source 2000 Census
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Demographics Affect the Labor Force
- Demographic trends set a crucial context for
workforce strategy decisions - Any future regional strategies will need to
account for continued population declines and an
aging population - Actions designed to stop the loss or reverse the
trend - Actions designed to maximize the experience and
productivity of the residents who currently live
in the region - Low growth regions risk being perceived by
employers and people as places in which they
wont be able to find what they need (labor
force, wages) - Southwest MN may have to rely more heavily on
in-migration to support the growth of its
population
19What can we do?
- These trends impact
- Workforce availability
- Industrial recruitment efforts
- The politics of economic development
- Rural v. Urban service distribution
- Youth v. Aging service needs
- These trends make a compelling justification for
- Increasing our birth rate
- Making Southwest Minnesota more attractive to our
youth - Making Southwest Minnesota more attractive and
more receptive to international migrants - Lowering our expectations for the future
20Why?
Access to a skilled work force remains the No. 1
priority of corporate site seekers, according to
a recent Site Selection survey of economic
development (ED) groups and service providers.
Survey Reveals New Factors Behind Site
Location Decisions by Mark Arend, Site
Selection magazine, May 1999
21Brainstorming about Demographics
22A Job Bust from the Baby Boom?
- Labor force participation rates are increasing
for - Women of all ages
- For females aged 16 years and over, Labor force
participation rates grew from 62.5 in 1990 to
66.0 in 2000 (Minnesota ranks 1 in the U.S.) - Older adults
- For males aged 65 to 69, Labor force
participation rates grew from 28.7 in 1990 to
33.2 in 2000 females grew 18.2 to 24.0 - Teenagers
- For males aged 16 to 19, Labor force
participation grew from 59.7 in 1990 to 60.3
in 2000 females grew from 61.0 to 63.9
23Not Necessarily
- The Region 8 labor force is projected to grow
2.8 through 2030 - Female labor force will grow 5.9 in Region 8
- 65 years labor force will grow 108.3
- 25-44 years labor force will decline -11.9
24Not Necessarily
- The Region 6W labor force is projected to grow
0.8 to 2030 - Female labor force will grow 5.0 in Region 6W
- 65 years labor force will grow 123.2
- 25-44 years labor force will decline -13.7
25Women in the Work Force
- The region has long had a much lower female labor
force participation rate - Minnesota is 1 in the U.S. at 66.0
- Southwest Minnesota was at 59.9 overall
- Only Lyon County surpassed the state rate
(66.3) - Big Stone (51.4), Lincoln (56.0), Cottonwood
(57.5), Lac qui Parle (57.7), and Yellow
Medicine (58.2) were lowest - However, there were more females aged 25 years
and over in every county except Swift (prison)
26Growing Faster in Regional Centers
- Kandiyohi, Lyon, McLeod, Meeker, Nobles, Swift,
and Redwood Counties will see the biggest
increases in labor force through 2030 - Willmar, Marshall, Hutchinson, Litchfield,
Benson, Worthington, and Redwood Falls - Other counties will see declines or increases
only in 65 years over
27Hard Work Ethic
- In Region 8, labor force participation rates for
young people (16-34), middle-aged people (35-54
and 55-64), and senior citizens (65 and over)
exceeded comparable rates for the state
28The Loyalty Effect
- Research shows that Americans are changing jobs
and careers more frequently, regardless of the
economy. The median number of years that wage and
salary workers had been with their current
employer (referred to as employee tenure) was 3.7
years in January 2002 - Despite these trends to the contrary, workers in
Southwest Minnesota continue to display a
remarkable amount of loyalty to their
employers. According to a recent Labor Force
Assessment, the median employee tenure was set
almost twice as high, at 7 years
29Demography and the Economy
- These regional demographic trends impact the
local economy - A long-term tightening of the labor force in our
region is predicted - The loss of the young adult population leads to a
different kind of labor market - Right now, there is slower growth in entry-level
workers - That leaves an available pool of experienced
workers - But experienced workers typically demand higher
wages, or perhaps better health insurance or
more schedule flexibility - In-migration has become much more important to
the local labor force, requiring new workers to
fill in available jobs - Therefore, non-traditional students and
continuing education are areas of potential
future growth for higher education - What does that mean for businesses?
30What Does It Mean?
- With fewer mid-career and less growth in new
entrants, employers will probably be looking for - Productivity increases
- Workforce development
- Recruitment
- Relocation
- What comes first, the people or the jobs?
- Population and income growth generates demand
for services - If people are retiring or moving away, who will
fill the jobs?
31Educational Attainment
- The region has fewer entry-level workers, but a
stable, available pool of experienced, older
workers - Although they are loyal, they arent necessarily
more skilled - Southwest Minnesota lags the rest of the state in
most measures of educational attainment, with
fewer workers having associates, bachelors, or
advanced degrees - 56 percent of the population aged 25 years and
over stopped with a High School diploma or less
(State 40.9)
32(No Transcript)
33Market-Clearing Match
- Research shows that close to 71 percent of jobs
in Minnesota and 76.4 percent of jobs in
Southwest require only a High School diploma - As compared to 8.2 percent of jobs that require
some college or an associates degree - 15.4 percent of jobs require a bachelors degree
or above
34Wages are VERY Important
- 90 of respondents rated an increase in pay as
important with 64 of respondents rating it as
very important - 87 of respondents rated an increase in job
benefits as important with 64 of respondents
rating it as very important - 80 of respondents rated better utilization of
skills as important - 79 of respondents rated more job security as
important
35Wage Comparison Analysis
- Wages are much lower in Southwest Minnesota than
in the rest of the state (exc. NWMN) less than
10 of jobs pay 25 or more - State 21
36Wage Comparison Analysis
- Low wages in Southwest Minnesota have got to be
one reason for our high rate of out-migration - The median hourly wage for Region 6W is 11.83
(78 of state) - The median hourly wage for Region 8 is 12.29
(80.6) - The median hourly wage for Minnesota is 15.25
- The highest paying jobs are typically
- Management occupations (27.10-29.55)
- Architecture and engineering occupations
(21.93-22.48) - Business and financial operations occupations
(21.65-19.69) - Life, physical, and social sciences occupations
(21.04-18.93) - The lowest paying jobs are concentrated in
- Food preparation and serving related occupations
(7.55-7.71) - Sales and related occupations (8.15-8.95)
- Building, grounds cleaning, and maint.
occupations (8.61-9.28)
37Regional Salary Surveys
- Minnesota Salary Survey is based on a rolling
survey of 22,000 employers - Updated quarterly and annually for the state,
regions, and MSAs - Third Quarter 2004
- Distribution stats for 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th,
and 90th percentiles - Southwest Minnesota typically pays less than 80
percent of the metro wage
www.deed.state.mn.us/lmi/tools/oes/
38Competitive Occupational Groups
- Only two major occupational groups pay more in
Southwest Minnesota - Education, training, and library occupations
- Protective service occupations
- Several occupational groups are competitive
- Healthcare support occupations
- Food preparation and serving related occupations
- Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations
- Transportation and material moving occupations
- Several occupational groups earn significantly
less - Management occupations
- Business and financial operations occupations
- Computer and mathematical occupations
- Architecture and engineering occupations
- Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media
occupations - Healthcare practitioners and related occupations
- Construction and extraction occupations
39Occupational Selection
- Southwest Minnesota had a much lower percentage
of people employed in management and professional
occupations (29.9) than the rest of the state
(35.8) - And a much lower number of sales and office
occupations (21.7) than the state (26.5) - But a much higher percentage of people employed
in production, transportation, and material
moving occupations (18.6 vs. 14.9 statewide) - Defined by the regions industry composition
- And most notably, in farmers and farm managers
(8.1 vs. 1.5 statewide)
40Gender Differences
- Males had a higher percentage of management
occupations (20.7 vs. 6.1) females had a
higher percentage of professional occs. (20.8
vs. 8.6) - Female workers were more likely to be employed
in - Office and administrative support occupations
- Education, training, and library occupations
- Healthcare practitioners (Registered Nurses)
- Bookkeeping clerks, accountants and auditors
- Cooks and food prep workers
- Male workers were more likely to be employed in
- Agriculture
- Construction
- Manufacturing
41What Money Cant Buy
- 93 of working residents in Region 8 and 84 in
Region 6W were employed within their region - Less than 5 are employed in the bordering
counties of North and South Dakota and Iowa - In Region 8 75 had one-way commute times under
15 minutes and 93 had one-way commute times
under 30 minutes - In Region 6W 74 had one-way commute times under
15 minutes - In Region 7W 46 had one-way commute times under
15 minutes and 18 at 46 minutes or more
42(No Transcript)
43Brainstorming about the Workforce
44Southwest MN Economy
- Region 8 had 3,978 firms 52,858 jobs paying
1.34 billion in 2003 - 75.6 of employment in Region 8 is in
services-producing industries 24.4 of jobs are
in the goods-producing domain (state 19.3) - 78.9 of employment in Region 8 is in the Private
sector 21.1 of jobs are in the Public or
Government sector (state 14.4) - Region 8 gained a net of 212 jobs but lost -66
firms from 2000 to 2003 - Region 6W had 1,653 firms 18,126 jobs paying
440 million in 2003 - 78.8 of employment in Region 6W is in
services-producing industries 21.8 of jobs are
in the goods-producing domain - 72.1 of employment in Region 6W is in the
Private sector 27.9 of jobs are in the Public
or Government sector - Region 6W lost a net of -269 jobs and -37 firms
from 2000 to 2003
45(No Transcript)
46Distinguishing Industries
- Value-added Agriculture Production
- Animal Production
- Crop Production
- Agriculture Support Activities
- Food Manufacturing
- Machinery Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade
- Farm Equipment
- Truck Transportation and Gasoline Stations
- Healthcare and Nursing Care
- Nursing and Residential Care for elderly
residents - Public and private
47Largest Industries Region 8
48Largest Industries Region 6W
49Manufacturing
- Manufacturing is the largest employing non-ag
industry in Region 8, with 17.8 of total
regional jobs (9,425 jobs) - Statewide, manufacturing lost just over -50,000
jobs during the recession - Region 8 lost -1,596 manufacturing jobs from 2000
to 2003 - Food Manufacturing lost -1,225 jobs but is still
the largest employing manufacturing specialty
(4,339 jobs) - Computer Electronic Product Mfg. lost -460 jobs
- Machinery Mfg. gained 316 jobs (highest-paying)
- Manufacturing is the second largest employing
non-ag industry in Region 6W, with 13.7 of total
regional jobs (2,490 jobs) - Region 6W lost -631 manufacturing jobs from 2000
to 2003 - Food Manufacturing is the largest specialty (620
jobs) - Computer Electronic Product Mfg. gained 37 jobs
(highest-paying) - Fabricated Metal Product Mfg. gained 36 jobs, up
to 259 jobs - Machinery Mfg. lost -278 jobs, down to 470 jobs
50Healthcare Social Assistance
- Healthcare Social Assistance is the largest
employing industry in Region 6W, with 18 of
total regional jobs (3,259 jobs) - Statewide, healthcare social assistance added
just over 38,500 jobs from 2000-2003 (sometimes
called recession-proof) - Region 6W added 341 jobs from 2000 to 2003
- 1,047 jobs at regional Hospitals 329 jobs at
Ambulatory Healthcare Services (clinics,
doctors offices, dentists, chiropractors, etc.) - 1,263 jobs at Nursing Residential Care
Facilities - Added 106 jobs from 2000 to 2003
- Healthcare Social Assistance is the second
largest employing industry in Region 8, with 16
of total regional jobs (8,458 jobs) - Region 8 added 1,172 healthcare social
assistance jobs - 1,145 jobs at Hospitals 2,207 jobs at Healthcare
Services - 3,385 jobs at Nursing Residential Care
Facilities - Added 108 jobs from 2000 to 2003
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54A Trade-Off?
- Longevity and Stability
- Southwest Minnesota has a large number of
businesses that have been operating for more than
30 years - Vitality and Growth
- Southwest Minnesota has a smaller number of new
businesses created in the last five years - We need different industries not just more of the
same - Southwest has many older firms in older
industries - Competition in these mature industries has
already squeezed out the windfall profits - That leaves thin margin firms in thin margin
industries
55Thin Margin vs. High Tech
- Thin margin firms are more susceptible to
- Minimal investment in research and development
- Infrequent investment in new capital equipment
- Lean staff salaries
- High sensitivity to tax environment
- Vulnerable to merger and acquisition
- High Tech Industries tend to have fat margins
- Because of the high-value added production in
high-tech industries, and the greater demand for
high-skilled labor, these industries compensate
their employees well. - America's High-Tech Economy Growth Development,
and Risks for Metropolitan Areas Ross DeVol,
Perry Wong, John Catapano, and Greg Robitshek
The Milkin Institute
56Emerging Goods-producing Industries
57Brainstorming about Industries
58Conclusions
- People are moving into/around metropolitan areas
and out of rural areas - The population in Southwest Minnesota is growing
older - The Baby Boom will not necessarily create a Job
Bust - Labor force participation rates are increasing
for women, older adults, and teenagers but also
are bolstered by in-migration - Workers in Southwest Minnesota are more
affordable than metro areas, and they show
remarkable loyalty to employers - Many would change jobs if offered an increase in
pay - Commute times are much shorter than in metro
areas - The largest industries are Manufacturing,
Healthcare Social Assistance, Educational
Services, Retail Trade, Construction - Manufacturing is declining overall but various
specialties are still growing - Healthcare Social Services are increasing
aging population ensures demand - Agriculture is still the foundation of the local
and regional economy
59Making Sense
- Why is it so important that we
- Think and act regionally?
- Attract different industries not just more of
the same? - Because we need to overcome or compensate for
- The inevitable demographics of an aging,
declining population - The constraining impact of a tight labor market
60Questions?
- Cameron Macht
- Regional Analysis Outreach Unit
- 320-231-5174 ext. 7535
- cameron.macht_at_state.mn.us
- Dept. of Employment Economic Development
- LMI Analyst HelpLine
- 651/282-2714
- DEED Publications
- 651/296-6545
- DEED LMI Web Site
- www.deed.state.mn.us/lmi/
Thank You!