Title: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
1CISNET Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Mod
eling Network
Eric J. (Rocky) Feuer, Ph.D. Chief, Statistical R
esearch and Applications Branch, Division of
Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National
Cancer Institute
2Overview
- NCI Sponsored Consortium Focused on Why and
What If Questions in Cancer Trends
- Statistical Modeling of the Impact of Cancer
Control Interventions (Screening, Treatment,
Prevention) on Current and Future Trends
- Optimal Cancer Control Planning
- Two Rounds of Funding (4 year grants) U01
Cooperative Agreement
- Sept. 2000 - 9 Funded Grants- Breast (7),
Prostate (1) and Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Aug. 2002 8 Funded Grants - Prostate (1),
Colorectal (2), and Lung Cancer (5)
- RFA to be reissued shortly
3Funded CISNET Grantees
Three CRC Models Zauber (MSK), Kuntz (Harvard),
Rutter (Group Health)
4CISNET Goals
- Develop and enhance multi-cohort based population
models (including new methodology)
- Real cohorts representing the necessary birth
cohorts to construct cross- sectional rates for
specified years and age groups
- Ideally can address the full range of
interventions
- Establish infrastructure to facilitate
communication and understanding among modelers
- Model Profiler
- Comparative Modeling Projects (Base Cases)
- Gain access to data sets that might not otherwise
be available
- Develop liaisons and provide assistance to
outside groups to address questions amenable to
modeling
- AHRQ/CMS CE of immunochemical FOBT
- CDC/NCI Healthy People 2010 mid-course
correction studies
5Types of Questions Population Models Can Address
- Responsive to Challenges Due to Increasing Pace
of Technology.
- Provide short term answers while Randomized
Controlled Trials (RCTs) are still in progress
(e.g. PSA testing for prostate cancer)
- Address emerging questions while they are still
being debated in the scientific/policy forum.
- Impact of smokeless tobacco products.
- Virtual colonoscopy esp. policies/practices in
polyp-size threshold for sending patients on for
conventional colonoscopy
- Translate RCT evidence to the population
setting.
- Population impact of adjuvant therapy and
mammography for breast cancer.
- Provide estimates of quantities that will never
be derived from RCTs.
- Impact of smoking cessation in the US on future
lung cancer trends.
6Making Results of Modeling Efforts More
Transparent
- Modeling has been marred by
- Difficulty of understanding and comparing
different model assumptions and structure
- Lack of comparability of inputs, outputs, basic
definitions
- Addressed with Model Profiler and Base Cases
7CISNET Model Profiler
8(No Transcript)
9CISNET Model Profiler
10CISNET Model Profiler
11CISNET Model Profiler
12CISNET Model Profiler
cisnet.cancer.gov (public site)
13CISNET Base Cases
- Groups jointly decide to address a common
question
- Common population-based inputs are used
- Modelers maintain the unique deeper aspects of
their models (e.g. assumptions and formulation of
the natural history of disease)
- Common computer runs and content/format of
outputs are specified
- Provides a chance to reach common consensus on
important questions, and to better understand
differences between models
14CISNET Breast Cancer Base QuestionWhat is the
Impact of Mammography, Adjuvant Therapy, and the
Combination on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality
1975-2000?
15Colorectal Cancer Base Case Questions
- Graduated approach
- Base Case I What is the impact of different
natural history models on incidence and mortality
- Hypothetical situation with conditions in 1978
frozen in time with no interventions
- Base Case II What is the impact of a single
screen (FOBT, colonoscopy, flex sig) at age 65
w/wo follow-up surveillance after detection of an
adenoma
16Modeling Hypothetical Cohorts vs. Population
Cohorts
- Cost effectiveness models usually conducted on
hypothetical cohorts
- In some settings population models can add
additional insights to C/E issues especially
when
- Capacity is an issue
- Costs depend on volume