Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris Traceroute - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris Traceroute

Description:

Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris Traceroute. Brice Augustin ... Paris traceroute removes 10,662 from 19,159 (56%) Loops appear in 4.5% of the measured routes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Bri8180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris Traceroute


1
Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris
Traceroute
  • Brice Augustin
  • (Université Pierre et Marie Curie-LIP6/CNRS)
  • Xavier Cuvellier, Timur Friedman, Renata Teixeira
  • (Université Pierre et Marie Curie-LIP6/CNRS)
  • Fabien Viger, Benjamin Orgogozo, Matthieu Latapy
  • (Université Denis Diderot-LIAFA/CNRS)
  • Clémence Magnien
  • (Ecole Polytechnique-CREA/CNRS)

2
Problem ?
  • Identified traceroute deficiencies on load
    balanced paths
  • Measured paths are inaccurate and incomplete
  • False diamonds, false loops and false cycles
  • Built a new traceroute Paris traceroute

3
Traceroute under load balancing
Actual topology
A
C
Dst
E
Src
L
TTL 2
B
D
TTL 3
Inferred topology
A
C
False link
Dst
E
Src
L
D
B
Missing nodes and links
4
Anomalies happen even under per-flow load
balancing
Port 2
Flow 1
A
C
Port 1
Dst
E
Src
L
TTL 2
Port 3
B
D
TTL 1
TTL 3
  • Traceroute uses the destination port as
    identifier
  • Per-flow load balancers use the destination port
    as part of the flow identifier

5
Paris traceroute
  • Solves the problem with per-flow load balancing
  • Probes to a destination belong to same flow
  • How to identify probes?
  • Use the UDP checksum
  • Does not address per-packet load balancing

Checksum 3
Checksum 2
Port 1
Port 1
A
C
Checksum 1
Port 1
Dst
E
Src
L
TTL 2
TTL 3
B
D
TTL 1
6
Anomalies false loops and cycles
TTL 3
A
Actual topology
Src
Dst
L
D
B
C
TTL 4
TTL 2
Inferred topology
Src
Dst
L
D
B
7
Anomalies false diamonds
A
C
Actual topology
Dst
E
Src
L
B
D
Inferred topology
A
C
Dst
E
Src
L
D
B
8
Measurement artifacts are common
From our LIP6 vantage point
  • Diamonds appear in 30 of the destinations
  • Paris traceroute removes 10,662 from 19,159 (56)
  • Loops appear in 4.5 of the measured routes
  • Paris traceroute removes 5,047 from 5,795 (87)
  • Cycles appear in 0.25 of the measured routes
  • Paris traceroute removes 3,886 from 5,674 (68)
  • Other causes
  • Routing changes
  • NAT boxes
  • Buggy routers
  • Per-packet load balancing

9
AnomaliesLoops caused by buggy routers
-bash traceroute Dst traceroute to Dst 1 B
0.289 ms 2 B 0.278 ms 3 Dst 0.578 ms
Dst
Src
A
B
X
Forwards the probe with TTL equal to 0
Rejects the probe with a TTL of 0 and sends it
back to the source
TTL 1
TTL 2
TTL 1
Rejects the probe with a TTL of 0 and sends it
back to the source
Forwards the probe with TTL equal to 0
-bash traceroute-paris Dst traceroute to Dst 1
B 0.289 ms !T0 2 B 0.278 ms 3 Dst
0.578 ms
Src
Dst
B
10
AnomaliesLoops caused by NAT boxes
Response TTL 254 IP Identifier 12375
Response TTL 252 IP Identifier 9356

Dst (NAT)
Src
B
C
A
Dst
B
TTL 2
TTL 3
TTL 3
Response TTL 253 IP Identifier 5286
2
Dst
Src
A
11
Conclusion
  • Classic traceroute leads to anomalies
  • False diamonds, false loops and false cycles
  • Per-flow load balancers cause most of the
    anomalies
  • Paris traceroute reports more precise paths

12
More information
www.paris-traceroute.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com