Title: Another week of COMM 3100 fun
1Another week of COMM 3100 fun!
- M W Arguing Communication Practices from
Ethical Perspectives, cont. - W Read Is It Ever OK to Lie essay found on
WWW Links Page of course web page - Due in Lab
- COMPLETE Plagiarism e-Tutorials (2 parts)
- (5 pts. each for LAB WORK on tutorials)
- Essay 1 topic assigned
2Communication Controversy O the Day Report
- The Sailors
- Maggie Davolos
- Megan Hencey
- Katherine Koehn
- Matt Quijas
3The Generic Ballot . . .
- A. YES . . .
- (pro, affirmative)
- B. NO . . .
- (con / negative)
4Moving On . . . Whos Up Next?
- MART
- Rosalena Baez
- Tarek Tabbara
- Marcus Watkins
- April Wright
5Major Ethical Perspectives (E)
- Political (Democratic) Perspective
- 2. Human Nature Perspective
- 3. Dialogical Perspective
- 4. Situational Perspective
6Human Nature Perspective (e)
- Focus
- Does communication seek to control or divide
people OR acknowledge the value of competing
views and differences?
7Human Nature Perspective--Assumptions (e)
- Is the communication / message structured to
promote differences among people? - we / they us / them
- e.g. --how are we (you!) segregated as a
society? - --One nation under God?
- --same-sex marriage
8Human Nature Perspective--Assumptions (e)
- Does the communication primarily serve a
communicators self-interest / selfish cause? - ( or designed to foster the
- audiences well being? )
-
- e.g. --security advertising / emotional appeals
- --Oral Roberts example
9Human Nature Perspective--Assumptions (e)
- Is the communicator holder of absolute truth
which is somehow inaccessible to others? - e.g. --Govt. communication
- --Technical / Caring professions
- --Religious persuasion . . .
-
10Human Nature Perspective (e)
- Conclusion
- Communication activity should promote an
equalness among people, and structure messages
and practices that acknowledge all audience
members.
11What do you believe?
- Is it right or acceptable for universities
to have predominately segregated (by race) social
organizations (i.e. all white / all black
fraternities and sororities)? - A. YES
- B. NO
12What YOU believe . . .
- 50 YES acceptable for segregated
fraternities / sororities - 50 NO
- not acceptable for segregated fraternities /
sororities
13Where do you stand in this one?
- Im Greek, it is ACCEPTABLE for Greek
organizations to be segregated - Im Greek, it is NOT ACCEPTABLE for Greek
organizations to be segregated - Im Independent, it is ACCEPTALBE for Greek
organizations to be segregated - Im Independent, it is NOT ACCEPTABLE for Greek
organizations to be segregated
14Major Ethical Perspectives (E)
- Political (Democratic) Perspective
- 2. Human Nature Perspective
- 3. Dialogical Perspective
- 4. Situational Perspective
15Dialogical Perspective (E)
- Focus
- Communication practices that focus on dialogue
instead of monologue - --An Invitational Discourse
- --Not to change / dominate you.
- --Inviting you to understand my view.
- --I wish to understand yours.
16Martin Bubers Philosophy of Dialogue (Jewish
Philosopher, 1878-1965) (e)
- Authenticity
- Inclusion
- Confirmation
- Presentness
- Spirit of Mutual Equality
- Supportive Climate
17Dialogical Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Authenticity
- Not seeming to be an other or playing a
role. - Inclusion
- Be willing to do more than tolerate the
other affirm the other as a worthy dialogic
partner.
18Dialogical Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Confirmation
- Without giving up ones own conviction,
willingness to listen to / understand the
perspective of others. - Presentness
- Willingness to become fully involved in the
communicative act (risking attachment).
19Dialogical Perspective--Assumptions-- (E)
- Spirit of Mutual Equality
- Diminish unequal status or accomplishment.
- Supportive Climate
- Encourage the other to communicate /
- facilitate their communication.
20Dialogical Perspective (E)
- Conclusion
- Communication should focus more on learning the
attitudes and views held by the other rather than
on winning an argument or exerting power over
others.
21Is Your Approach to Communication Dialogical???
- Carl Rowan so often writes as if there can be
just no viewpoint other than his own. His recent
column on immigration was a case in point. I am
not writing to take issue with his position, but
to chide him for his attitude toward those who
disagree with him . . . let him refrain from
disparagementto the point of contempttoward
those who disagree with him.