BACKGROUND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

BACKGROUND

Description:

BACKGROUND – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: mikeb74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BACKGROUND


1
BACKGROUND
  • What happens when a new medium challenges an
    existing one?
  • Several previous examples
  • radio and print
  • public changes -- actually a cohort effect
  • television and film
  • at first - film profits were hurt
  • later - film developed its own niche

2
VIDEOS VERSUSMOVIE THEATERS
BACKGRO VIDEOS VERSUSMOVIE THEATERS UND
  • Will availability of feature films on video
    affect theater attendance?
  • Windowing
  • (Owen Wildman, 1992 Litman, 1999)
  • A form of price discrimination
  • films are released to theaters before video
  • for a consumer, waiting offers a cost savings
  • Here Examination of CONSUMERS

3
HYPOTHESES
HYPOTHESES
  • Rational economic price discrimination model
  • Who will attend movies?
  • H1 Younger people
  • H2 Higher incomes
  • H3 Smaller households
  • H4 People with more interest in newer products
  • Who will watch videos?
  • H1 Older people
  • H2 Lower incomes
  • H3 Larger households
  • H4 People with less interest in newer products

4
METHODS
  • DDBs 1996 Lifestyles data
  • initial mailings of 5,000
  • 4,041 total respondents (70 response rate)
  • 3,130 supplemental survey (77 response rate)
  • This research
  • age, income, household size
  • desire for the latest products
  • movie and video consumption questions

5
OF FILMS AND VIDEOS SEEN LAST YEAR
  • last year Attended film Rented video Bought
    video
  • None 965 (31.1) 1264 (41.4) 931 (30.2)
  • 1-4 times 1051 (33.6) 527 (17.1) 932
    (30.5)
  • 5-8 times 510 (16.3) 455 (14.7) 442
    (14.5)
  • 9-11 times 265 (8.5) 367 (11.9) 226
    (7.4)
  • 12-24 times 215 (6.9) 414 (13.4) 123
    (4.0)
  • 25-51 times 68 (2.2) 248 (8.0) 45
    (1.5)
  • 52 or more 29 (0.9) 143 (4.6) 23
    (0.8)
  • MEAN 2.37 3.04 2.10

6
RESULTS OF FILMS
RESULTSNUMBER of FILMS
  • H1 Younger people
  • Beta -.191, p
  • H2 Higher incomes
  • Beta .201, p
  • H3 Smaller households
  • Beta -.137, p
  • H4 People w/more interest in newer products
  • Beta .138, p

7
RESULTSRATIO of VIDEOS/FILMS
  • H1 Older people
  • Beta .153, p
  • H2 Lower incomes
  • Beta -.082, p
  • H3 Larger households
  • Beta .189, p
  • H4 People w/less interest in newer products
  • Beta -.192, p .001- SUPPORTED

8
CONCLUSIONS
  • Compatible with rational economic model
  • MOVIES PREFERED BY
  • People who value latest films
  • Younger people
  • People with higher incomes
  • People with smaller families
  • The desire to be the first product predicts
    economic value and price discrimination
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com